Ask Moshe

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
How about Proverbs 31:10-31?[/quote]When I met my wife 22 years ago I was working at Lenscrafters as an optical technician. I used to make artistic ornaments out of damaged eyeglass lenses. I cut one in the shape of a heart, tinted it deep red and inscribed it with “You’re my Proverbs 31 dreamgirl”. I filled the letters with whiteout and ran the polisher over it so that the white inscription was left in the red lens.

One of the interesting things about that passage is that it is reported to have been told to a king named Lemuel by his mother. Not the words of a man.
[/quote]

Well, then, your appreciation may grow with two further points.

FIrst, this is the passage that every husband chants to his wife to inaugurate the Sabbath.

Second, Lemuel is not mentioned as a king in any other chronicle. Therefore Rashi interprets the passage to reflect its true author, Solomon, who speaks for the sake of God ( l’mo-el means “to the mouth of God.”)
Recall that Bathsheba was Solomon’s mother, and this passage is a record of Bathsheba advising her son who is to be king. Suddenly through Rashi’s insight, the speech is that of a mature and worldly woman who knew sin, how men err, and grew all the wiser for it.

You mean chant as in a sort of cadence? And in Hebrew I assume? Every Sabbath?

While I of course knew that Lemuel was not mentioned elsewhere and that Bathsheba was Solomon’s mother, I have never spent the time to settle who I thought they might be though many Christians agree that they are Bathsheba and Solomon.

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
What’s better complimentary marriage or egalitarian marriage and what is yours?[/quote]

Well, I had to look up what those words mean. Still not sure I am translating them correctly.

There are distinct roles in a traditional Jewish marriage that the husband and wife fill, sometimes overlapping roles. Both equally important. But the roles are distinct.

Bit like the heart and brain. You need both, and both are equally important, but they are different.

There are some things where she is the boss and some things where I am the boss.

It’s very, very traditional. She wears a Tiechel or a Sheitel, just like I wear a kippah. We sit on seperate sides of the Shul. I don’t voluntarily shake hands (or touch) women who are not my family, and her in reverse.

A lot of people would belittle a traditional marriage, but keep in mind Mrs. Jewbacca is a well-respected surgeon and combat veteran herself. She’s very physically fit. MENSA member. Very pretty – men would come running if she was on the market.

The thing she is most proud of? Being a mom. She’d be sad if she had to leave medicine. She’d be heart broken if she could not change a diaper.

There are dramatic differences between men and women. We are not the same. Thank G-d.

[/quote]
Have you read Unorthodox? And if so, is it accurate? It seems that the asserted facts presented by the author don’t strike me as even slightly egalitarian, but it may be she has an axe to grind with the community. I found the book interesting, but its hard to determine, for me, if things are largely as she states or if she fictionalizes it a bit to make better copy.

[quote]groo wrote:
Have you read Unorthodox? And if so, is it accurate? It seems that the asserted facts presented by the author don’t strike me as even slightly egalitarian, but it may be she has an axe to grind with the community. I found the book interesting, but its hard to determine, for me, if things are largely as she states or if she fictionalizes it a bit to make better copy.[/quote]

No. I do know the author was from a family of Satmar Hasidic Jews.

The Satmar are a very isolated group that hates the modern state of Israel, fellow Hasidic Jews like Chabad Lubavitchers, and hates other Hasidic or Orthodox. Similar to the group Neturei Karta (the Jews ones sees hugging the mullahs of Iran), albeit of a different origin.

I don’t know a thing about their marriage, but holding them up as mainstream Orthodox Judaism would be like holding up the Heaven’s Gate Cult as mainstream Christians, so it’s a bit irrelevant to Judaism at large.

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
How about Proverbs 31:10-31?[/quote]

How about it?

[quote]treco wrote:
So if the observant were to touch the non-familial, opposite sex, do they become unclean for a period? And perhaps unable to engage in public religious matters?

[/quote]

No more than any other sin, no. It’s not a matter of the act being unclean, it’s a matter that I made a promise to my wife not to touch another woman.

The same way I’d joyfully head a ham and cheese sandwhich if trapped on a desert isle. Presevation of life and limb comes before any of the minor stuff.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

The same way I’d joyfully head a ham and cheese sandwhich if trapped on a desert isle. Presevation of life and limb comes before any of the minor stuff.
[/quote]

Nice; I like that.[/quote]

I like it, too. In many places in the OT, the commandment is “live.” For example, Deut 4:1

" And now, O Israel, hearken to the statutes and to the judgments which I teach you to do, in order that you may live, and go in and possess the land which the Lord, God of your forefathers, is giving you."

But I will expand on JB’s adverb: “joyfully.”

At the turn of the 20th century the Czar’s army would conscript Jewish boys for periods of 15 or more years. OF course, no soldier was ever fed well, let alone kosher. Two such soldiers appealed to a legalist rabbi of renown, asking, if all they were fed was pork, would it be permissible to eat, or would it be better to starve to death.
The rabbi, in what is called a responsa wrote back, citing the passage above “‘listen to the statutes and judgments which I teach you to do, that you may live’ by them…and not die because of them. Therefore, you may eat pork…but you may not suck the bones.”

The logic is clear: the laws are to be respected and remembered, but the primary law is to preserve life. One may break the law to preserve a human life, but not more than necessary and not to take pleasure by doing so.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

The same way I’d joyfully head a ham and cheese sandwhich if trapped on a desert isle. Presevation of life and limb comes before any of the minor stuff.
[/quote]

Nice; I like that.[/quote]

I like it, too. In many places in the OT, the commandment is “live.” For example, Deut 4:1

" And now, O Israel, hearken to the statutes and to the judgments which I teach you to do, in order that you may live, and go in and possess the land which the Lord, God of your forefathers, is giving you."

But I will expand on JB’s adverb: “joyfully.”

At the turn of the 20th century the Czar’s army would conscript Jewish boys for periods of 15 or more years. OF course, no soldier was ever fed well, let alone kosher. Two such soldiers appealed to a legalist rabbi of renown, asking, if all they were fed was pork, would it be permissible to eat, or would it be better to starve to death.
The rabbi, in what is called a responsa wrote back, citing the passage above “‘listen to the statutes and judgments which I teach you to do, that you may live’ by them…and not die because of them. Therefore, you may eat pork…but you may not suck the bones.”

The logic is clear: the laws are to be respected and remembered, but the primary law is to preserve life. One may break the law to preserve a human life, but not more than necessary and not to take pleasure by doing so.[/quote]

Thanks for that Doc.

Again, I really like that attitude.

Maybe I should convert??? :-)[/quote]

Nah…you might have to give up a leg day or something…

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

The same way I’d joyfully head a ham and cheese sandwhich if trapped on a desert isle. Presevation of life and limb comes before any of the minor stuff.
[/quote]

Nice; I like that.[/quote]

I like it, too. In many places in the OT, the commandment is “live.” For example, Deut 4:1

" And now, O Israel, hearken to the statutes and to the judgments which I teach you to do, in order that you may live, and go in and possess the land which the Lord, God of your forefathers, is giving you."

But I will expand on JB’s adverb: “joyfully.”

At the turn of the 20th century the Czar’s army would conscript Jewish boys for periods of 15 or more years. OF course, no soldier was ever fed well, let alone kosher. Two such soldiers appealed to a legalist rabbi of renown, asking, if all they were fed was pork, would it be permissible to eat, or would it be better to starve to death.
The rabbi, in what is called a responsa wrote back, citing the passage above “‘listen to the statutes and judgments which I teach you to do, that you may live’ by them…and not die because of them. Therefore, you may eat pork…but you may not suck the bones.”

The logic is clear: the laws are to be respected and remembered, but the primary law is to preserve life. One may break the law to preserve a human life, but not more than necessary and not to take pleasure by doing so.[/quote]

Thanks for that Doc.

Again, I really like that attitude.

Maybe I should convert??? :-)[/quote]

Nah…you might have to give up a leg day or something…
[/quote]

Ah, well then forget it.

Thanks for the warning.[/quote]

Isn’t your mom’s mom Jewish? If so, you are already Jewish.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:

Isn’t your mom’s mom Jewish? If so, you are already Jewish.[/quote]

WTF? Ha ha ha!

Where did you get that idea, ruff?

My mom (and her mom, of course) is full-blooded (Christian) Arab!

Ah, I think maybe you’re confusing me with my good friend Cortes.

Right country, wrong prefecture (though we do live close to each other).[/quote]

Hell, I have no idea where I got that. Cortes?

My dad’s mom was Jewish, so I am not so privileged.


Bump.

So what is your take on the Abraham Isaac sacrifice?

Was Isaac willing?

Was God testing Abraham or the other way around?

I was even reading that there is a jewish tradition that Isaac was actually killed, supported by the specifics of what the angel says and that Isaac isn’t mentioned as returning from the hill.

Basically, what happened and what impact does the incident have on your faith.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Bump.

So what is your take on the Abraham Isaac sacrifice?

Was Isaac willing?

Was God testing Abraham or the other way around?

I was even reading that there is a jewish tradition that Isaac was actually killed, supported by the specifics of what the angel says and that Isaac isn’t mentioned as returning from the hill.

Basically, what happened and what impact does the incident have on your faith.[/quote]

Very few passages in the Bible give me more trouble than the Abraham Isaac sacrifice. Having two children that I love more than life itself, I often wonder if I could ever trust a god/God that would put me to such a test. I know that this is wrong in my faith, but not in my heart.

[quote]JEATON wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Bump.

So what is your take on the Abraham Isaac sacrifice?

Was Isaac willing?

Was God testing Abraham or the other way around?

I was even reading that there is a jewish tradition that Isaac was actually killed, supported by the specifics of what the angel says and that Isaac isn’t mentioned as returning from the hill.

Basically, what happened and what impact does the incident have on your faith.[/quote]

Very few passages in the Bible give me more trouble than the Abraham Isaac sacrifice. Having two children that I love more than life itself, I often wonder if I could ever trust a god/God that would put me to such a test. I know that this is wrong in my faith, but not in my heart.
[/quote]

Ah, well then, compare with Gen 18:20-33.

What part of faith is negotiable?

What is free will and who answers “here am I?”

[quote]JEATON wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

So what is your take on the Abraham Isaac sacrifice?

Was Isaac willing?

Was God testing Abraham or the other way around?

I was even reading that there is a jewish tradition that Isaac was actually killed, supported by the specifics of what the angel says and that Isaac isn’t mentioned as returning from the hill.

Basically, what happened and what impact does the incident have on your faith.[/quote]

Very few passages in the Bible give me more trouble than the Abraham Isaac sacrifice. Having two children that I love more than life itself, I often wonder if I could ever trust a god/God that would put me to such a test. I know that this is wrong in my faith, but not in my heart.
[/quote]

Oddly enough, I have always been puzzled by the confusion and consternation regarding the near-sacrifice of Isaac by his father. “What’s the big deal?” I thought.

Then I was flipping through the channels (a mistake, Mrs. Jewbacca hates that we even have TV in our house, and she is probably correct — but I am a football, er, soccer, addict) and stumbled across the history channel show of the Bible, and, as it happened, it was this very incident — Abraham taking his young son up the mountain.

“No, no, no.” I was screaming at the TV.

All factually wrong, and just flat ignoring both the timeline set forth in the Torah itself, not to mention the longer versions of these events set forth in the Talmud.

This Hollywood idea of Isaac as a young boy I think is why people completely miss the point of the story.

Isaac was NOT A YOUNG BOY.

He was in his mid/late 30s or so. Basically the point a blue collar man (which he was, a shephard) is at his toughest when it comes to a knock-down drag out fight. Abraham was well into his dottage. Very, very old. Had to be helped up the mountain by Isaac. Just remember, Abraham was OLD when Isaac was conceived. He was VERY OLD at this point.

If you read the complete story, Isaac had to steady Abraham’s hands and assist him along the most of the way.

So, was Isaac willing? Yeah. He could have beat the sh-t out of Abraham if he wanted. He REQUESTED being tied down in case his nerve slipped.

Was Abraham willing? Yeah, barely.

Now, on to the “testing” issue. Well, who gets the benefit of the test? HaShem? Do you think G-d needed to know how this was going to end? No, of course not. G-d knew exactly what was going to happen.

Abraham and Isaac, however, did not know.

Abraham and Issac each did not know the depth and commitment of not only each of his own faith, but Abraham did not know the depth of his son’s faith (nor vice versa, although perhaps not as critical for Isaac to know the depth of his father’s faith).

Rememeber, Ishmael was Abraham’s first son, probably really Abraham’s favorite. Abraham drove Ishamael out reluctantly and was plauged with doubts as to whether he did the right thing, as would be any good father.

This test gave Abraham the confidence that he chose wisely with Isaac. Similarly, it gave Isaac the confidence that he was chosen wisely, and was, indeed, the man for the job ahead.

As far as my faith is concerned, these are literally my ancestors, and it gives me the confidence to know that, in my small way, I may yet have (or my children may have) a part to play.

Similarly, when I am tested (for example, when the first Mrs. Jewbacca was murdered by descendants of Ishmael), I know that the purpose of this trial (and my coming out the other end with lovely adult daughters) was to benefit me, no matter how crappy and sad it makes me at the time — or how crappy and sad the death of my wife and my unborn son makes me as I type this.

[quote]JEATON wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Bump.

So what is your take on the Abraham Isaac sacrifice?

Was Isaac willing?

Was God testing Abraham or the other way around?

I was even reading that there is a jewish tradition that Isaac was actually killed, supported by the specifics of what the angel says and that Isaac isn’t mentioned as returning from the hill.

Basically, what happened and what impact does the incident have on your faith.[/quote]

Very few passages in the Bible give me more trouble than the Abraham Isaac sacrifice. Having two children that I love more than life itself, I often wonder if I could ever trust a god/God that would put me to such a test. I know that this is wrong in my faith, but not in my heart.
[/quote]

An interesting interpretation, (@4 mins onwards)…