Anyone Interested in a Serious Religious Debate?

Do you want to discuss the Christian bible, or, will you continue to argue from some foriegn source?

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning

So, the Word was there in beginning with God. Be even more importantly the Word WAS God.

What else do we know. Oh, right. The Word became flesh.

The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,d who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, [b]â??This was he of whom I said, â??He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me. (after all, the Word, which is God, was with God at the beginning.â??â?? From the fullness of his grace we have all received one blessing after another. For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only,e,f who is at the Fatherâ??s side, has made him known.

[quote]cueball wrote:

Ok. I’ll use your “divine logic” term. The scripture then says:

JOHN 1:1-3
In the beginning was the DIVINE LOGIC, and the DIVINE LOGIC was with God, and the DIVINE LOGIC was God. HE was with God in the beginning.

JOHN 1:14
The DIVINE LOGIC became flesh and made his dwelling among us.

It does not say the divine logic came into flesh. It says it BECAME flesh. Verse three doesn’t say “it” was with God, but HE. So a DIVINE LOGIC, or He, became flesh as stated in verse 14.

How is this story NOT about Jesus? What part of “was God” isn’t clear? This certainly makes Him divine.[/quote]

It’s not just a matter of word substitution. Logos became flesh encamped in us. There is no he. Logos us the subject of the sentence.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Do you want to discuss the Christian bible, or, will you continue to argue from some foriegn source?
[/quote]

Priceless.

Logos became flesh, then encamped in us…lol.

No. What is says is that the Word (use your logos if it makes you feel good) became flesh (not entered their flesh, but became flesh), and made HIS dwelling AMONG us.

Further, it says They’ve seen HIS glory, the glory of the One and Only WHO CAME FROM HIS FATHER FULL OF GRACE AND TRUTH. Keep that in mind, the GRACE and TRUTH part.

Now, proceed down a verse or two. It says Moses gave the law, but Jesus–yes, Jesus–brings GRACE and TRUTH. Oh, and the before-mentioned One and Only (who came from his father’s side full of Grace and Truth, Jesus) that I underlined?

“No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.”

The One and Only is God. The One and Only is the Father’s son.

[quote]Spartiates wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

Ok. I’ll use your “divine logic” term. The scripture then says:

JOHN 1:1-3
In the beginning was the DIVINE LOGIC, and the DIVINE LOGIC was with God, and the DIVINE LOGIC was God. HE was with God in the beginning.

JOHN 1:14
The DIVINE LOGIC became flesh and made his dwelling among us.

It does not say the divine logic came into flesh. It says it BECAME flesh. Verse three doesn’t say “it” was with God, but HE. So a DIVINE LOGIC, or He, became flesh as stated in verse 14.

How is this story NOT about Jesus? What part of “was God” isn’t clear? This certainly makes Him divine.[/quote]

It’s not just a matter of word substitution. Logos became flesh encamped in us. There is no he. Logos us the subject of the sentence.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Do you want to discuss the Christian bible, or, will you continue to argue from some foriegn source?
[/quote]

Priceless.[/quote]

More paraphrasing? Before, in your first paraphrase, you said “encamped itself among us”. Now you say “encamped IN us”. These two “paraphrases” read very different form one another. So which is it?

Simple word substitution is the least of our problems if Spartiates paraphrased translation keeps changing.

Also, tell me why simple word substitution doesn’t work when you posted this:

Logos is more like logic, reason, or order: it’s an abstract concept. Very Aristotelian no?

“In the beginning was reason/logic, and the reason/logic was with the divine, and logic/reason was the divine.”

How is this not simple substitution? All you have done is left out proceeding verses that use the same word, as in John 1:14.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Why did God create the serpent in the first place (especially with the capabilities it had)?

Here’s an analogy: Say I have a kid and he turns 13 years old. At the house, we are all sitting around when I show him a playboy. I tell him “you cannot look at this or touch this, it is mine and mine alone”. I leave the room, but send in my brother in law who I know likes to tell my kids to do things they shouldn’t. He tells him “it’s okay to read, why would he have put it there in the first place”. When I come back and find out my kid has read it, I blame him INSTEAD of playing my brother in law. I kick my son out of my house.

See why the Adam and Eve story doesn’t make much sense? I know my 13 year old boy would die to see the playboy. So what do I do? I send in the brother in law to just make sure he fails. God did the same thing with the creation of the snake.
[/quote]

Exactly.

Or you could have just put the playboy in your room and locked the door. Or not shown it to him at all. Or any of a number of things which would have saved your son from punishment.

Fact is, what it really boils down to, is that the god of the Christian bible is evil. He wants to send people to hell.

He creates a forbidden tree to “test” his new creations (because its not enough to give them free will, now you have to play games with it), and sends his “enemy” to tempt them (of course, knowing exactly what was going to happen) to eat it. And when they do, he punishes not only them but the rest of humanity forever.

Evil.

He creates the world in a way that is totally impossble according to the way the world works now. He creates plants first, then then sun, then makes plants dependant on the sun for survival – leading any rational, thinking person to believe that the sun had to come first.

He “pre-dates” the earth, so that things on it will show themselves to be much older than his holy book says they are. This totally unnecessarily causes the observable data about the world around us to conflict with the Bible (why couldn’t god just make things that are 6000 years old LOOK like they’re 6000 years old? why the games?). This causes humans to choose between an ancient book and the reliable data in front of them - and if they choose the data (which God has chosen to make confusing)? They go to hell.

The christian god is apparently full of setting his “most loved” creations up for excuses to send them to eternal pain and torment. [/quote]
God is evil? Not even close. Notice what God inspired Peter to write at 2 Peter 3:5-8:
"5 For, according to their wish, this fact escapes their notice, that there were heavens from of old and an earth standing compactly out of water and in the midst of water by the word of God; 6 and by those [means] the world of that time suffered destruction when it was deluged with water. 7 But by the same word the heavens and the earth that are now are stored up for fire and are being reserved to the day of judgment and of destruction of the ungodly men.
8 However, let this one fact not be escaping YOUR notice, beloved ones, that one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day. 9 Jehovah is not slow respecting his promise, as some people consider slowness, but he is patient with YOU because he does not desire any to be destroyed but desires all to attain to repentance.

God does not desire any to be destroyed but desires people to repent and live.

I thought I explained it pretty well in one of my post that that test was not unfair, tempting or burdensome. The test did not become a temptation until Satan tempted Eve. The Playboy analogy was not even close to the test God set up in the garden.

Yes the penalty of death given to Adam did pass to all of his descendants but God has provided a way to undo the effects of sin and death by given his only begotten son. Exercising faith in Jesus and following whats outlined in the Bible allows our sins to be continually forgiven.
Act 3:19 states:
“19 Repent, therefore, and turn around so as to get your sins blotted out.”

Ezekiel 33:16 states:
“16 None of his sins with which he has sinned will be remembered against him. Justice and righteousness are what he has carried on. He will positively keep living.”

1 John 1:7 states:
“However, if we are walking in the light as he himself is in the light, we do have a sharing with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin.”

Those are just a few scriptures that shows that once God forgives us of a sin they are blotted out just like you would use Wite-Out to remove text on a piece of paper. They are wiped away and not called to God’s mind. And if you’re walking in the light meaning if you’re in an approved state by God, Jesus’ sacrifice continually cleanses us of sin. Now that is a loving God.

God would never burn and torment even the worst sinner forever in a place called Hell. Capped, there is no place called Hell mentioned anywhere in the Bible. When one dies and pays the penalty that they inherited from Adam they are given a clean slate. There sins are blotted out, wiped away. Acts 24:15 states “that there is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.” So people who were bad before they died are going to get a second chance. How can that be? Roman 6:23 states that the “wages sin pays is death” so once one has died they have payed the price for sinning by dying. That’s why Romans 6:7(NIV) states “anyone who has died has been freed from sin.”
Capped, can you see how loving that is? The penalty that was given to Adam was dying and returning to dust not burning forever in a place of torment. Romans 5:12 states that through one man sin entered into the world and death(returning back to dust)through sin, thus death spread to all men. This death that spread to all Adam’s descendant passed to us due to no fault of our own. So that is why when one dies God is going to give that person a second chance and if one is in an approved state with God, when he removes the wicked that are still alive(ones who have not paid the Adamic penalty) at armegeddon those in an approved state will survive. That is love.

I can understand you thinking a God that would burn sinners forever in Hell is evil. But this is not what the Bible teaches. That teaching slanders and maligns God because it is false. The teaching that God takes a mother or father from a child to be with him in heaven is another teaching that slanders and maligns God because it is not what the Bible teaches and it is false.

The God I’ve come to know and love from what’s in the Bible is a loving God that is patient and quick to forgive. He would never burn someone for all eternity for being bad 30 or 40 years and he would never cause the death of someone to be with him in heaven.

Capped, God created the universe along with the sun and earth before he created anything on earth. So yes the sun was necessary for plants to grow. And just because we don’t understand something doesn’t mean that it’s not true. Scientist do not understand the whole birth process. They don’t understand what makes sperm travel to the egg and what causes the egg to divide and start to form a fetus. They can observe the process but they don’t understand and can’t explain exactly what starts it and why. You still believe that humans are born everyday don’t you? So just because we can’t fully explain or understand something does not mean that it is not true.[/quote]

I was reading your post, and was trying to think what happens to a person who dies and does not follow Jesus. I remembered what you said. They just turn to dust. Nothing else happens to them. Have I interpreted you right this time?[/quote]
That is exactly what the Bible says happens. That is the Adamic penalty which was clearly stated to Adam by God at Genesis 3:19 which states that out of the ground Adam was taken “For dust you are and to dust you will return.” He did not state “your body will return to dust but your soul or spirit will be tormented forever in fire.” As a matter of fact Genesis 2:7 clearly states how man was made. The verse states that God proceded to form the man from dust of the ground. It does not state that man is formed from dust, spirit and a soul.

Once a human dies the Bible states there thoughts and emotions cease so they could not burn in a place of torment.
Ecclesiastes 9:5,6,10(NIV) states:
5 For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing; they have no further reward, and even the memory of them is forgotten. 6 Their love, their hate and their jealousy have long since vanished; never again will they have a part in anything that happens under the sun
verse 10 states:
10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might, for in the grave, where you are going, there is neither working nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom."
Those verses show that the dead have no emotion or thinking capabilities once they die.

Psalms 146:3(NIV) states:
“3 Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save. 4 When their spirit departs, they return to the ground; on that very day their plans come to nothing.”
Those verses show that once they die their spirit or life-force leaves their body they return to the ground or dust and their plans or thoughts cease.

Ezekiel 18:3(NIV) states:
“3 For every living soul belongs to me, the father as well as the sonâ??both alike belong to me. The soul who sins is the one who will die.”
This verses shows that a living soul or person dies.

Ecclesiastes 3:20,21(NIV)
Man’s fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both: As one dies, so dies the other. All have the same breath (the footnote for breath at Bible.com states: Or spirit, my Bible translates breath as spirit) ;man has no advantage over the animal. Everything is meaningless. 20 All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return.”
Those verses show that at death man is not superior to the animals because they both have the same spirit and the same elements from dust that God used to make man he used to make animals and once both die they go to the same place which is dust.

Those are just a few scriptures that show once a human dies they return to dust and their thoughts cease so they could not be tormented in Hell or haunt anyone. So yes D the ghost that people see are wicked spirit beings and not dead people.[/quote]
Wow, no one wants to discuss.

I thought I’d hear things like: what about the lake of fire and sulpher?, what about the poor man and the Lazarus parable?, what about the firey furnace and the gnawing and gnashing of teeth?, If bad people get a second chance after death then what’s the point of being good?

Shocking!

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]Spartiates wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

You, being agnostic, and mse2us, being Jehovah’s Witness, have the same thoughts on this passage. You are not a Christian, but mse2us claims to be a Christian. I find this kind of ironic.[/quote]
Diggity D, I don’t know why you can’t understand this when I write it. Yes Jesus is divine. Any spirit being from heaven is divine. So I don’t deny Jesus is divine; he is divine. However, I do deny that Jesus is God Almighty because the Bible clearly states that they are two seperate spirit beings and God is head of Jesus(1 Corinthians 11:3) and Jesus is subject to God (1 Corinthians 15-24-28.

Do you now understand my position?[/quote]

M&M the word Divine means of or pertaining to a god, esp. the Supreme Being.

Angels are not divine. They are messengers of the Divine. So by Jesus claiming Divinity he is claiming to be God.

Jesus is 100% human and humans are subject to God. Why do you think Jesus humbled himself before God. Jesus is also 100% God which gives him the power to rule Heaven, Earth, and under the Earth.

[quote]cueball wrote:

More paraphrasing? Before, in your first paraphrase, you said “encamped itself among us”. Now you say “encamped IN us”. These two “paraphrases” read very different form one another. So which is it?
[/quote]

Same word: what do you think is the significant difference in the meaning? And then note that the Greek word could be either? In would be a more simple, more literal translation. The verb is active, so the logos pitched its tents in us.

[quote]cueball wrote:

Simple word substitution is the least of our problems if Spartiates paraphrased translation keeps changing.

Also, tell me why simple word substitution doesn’t work when you posted this:

Logos is more like logic, reason, or order: it’s an abstract concept. Very Aristotelian no?

“In the beginning was reason/logic, and the reason/logic was with the divine, and logic/reason was the divine.”

How is this not simple substitution? All you have done is left out proceeding verses that use the same word, as in John 1:14.[/quote]

I’m not following what you’re saying here. 1:1 is a pretty simple construction.

[quote]Spartiates wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

More paraphrasing? Before, in your first paraphrase, you said “encamped itself among us”. Now you say “encamped IN us”. These two “paraphrases” read very different form one another. So which is it?
[/quote]

Same word: what do you think is the significant difference in the meaning? And then note that the Greek word could be either? In would be a more simple, more literal translation. The verb is active, so the logos pitched its tents in us.[/quote]

What? Among and In? Or the Greek word you are translating from? If the latter, why not stick with one translation? Because among and in, in the context of the scripture, mean two different things.

[quote]cueball wrote:

Simple word substitution is the least of our problems if Spartiates paraphrased translation keeps changing.

Also, tell me why simple word substitution doesn’t work when you posted this:

Logos is more like logic, reason, or order: it’s an abstract concept. Very Aristotelian no?

“In the beginning was reason/logic, and the reason/logic was with the divine, and logic/reason was the divine.”

How is this not simple substitution? All you have done is left out proceeding verses that use the same word, as in John 1:14.[/quote]

You are correct. it is simple construction. And so Is 1:14. That is precisely my point. You are telling me that John is not claiming Jesus was divine by using your “reason/logic” translation. My point is that even with the substitution, 1:1 and 1:14 clearly show John stating Jesus is divine.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Why did God create the serpent in the first place (especially with the capabilities it had)?

Here’s an analogy: Say I have a kid and he turns 13 years old. At the house, we are all sitting around when I show him a playboy. I tell him “you cannot look at this or touch this, it is mine and mine alone”. I leave the room, but send in my brother in law who I know likes to tell my kids to do things they shouldn’t. He tells him “it’s okay to read, why would he have put it there in the first place”. When I come back and find out my kid has read it, I blame him INSTEAD of playing my brother in law. I kick my son out of my house.

See why the Adam and Eve story doesn’t make much sense? I know my 13 year old boy would die to see the playboy. So what do I do? I send in the brother in law to just make sure he fails. God did the same thing with the creation of the snake.
[/quote]

Exactly.

Or you could have just put the playboy in your room and locked the door. Or not shown it to him at all. Or any of a number of things which would have saved your son from punishment.

Fact is, what it really boils down to, is that the god of the Christian bible is evil. He wants to send people to hell.

He creates a forbidden tree to “test” his new creations (because its not enough to give them free will, now you have to play games with it), and sends his “enemy” to tempt them (of course, knowing exactly what was going to happen) to eat it. And when they do, he punishes not only them but the rest of humanity forever.

Evil.

He creates the world in a way that is totally impossble according to the way the world works now. He creates plants first, then then sun, then makes plants dependant on the sun for survival – leading any rational, thinking person to believe that the sun had to come first.

He “pre-dates” the earth, so that things on it will show themselves to be much older than his holy book says they are. This totally unnecessarily causes the observable data about the world around us to conflict with the Bible (why couldn’t god just make things that are 6000 years old LOOK like they’re 6000 years old? why the games?). This causes humans to choose between an ancient book and the reliable data in front of them - and if they choose the data (which God has chosen to make confusing)? They go to hell.

The christian god is apparently full of setting his “most loved” creations up for excuses to send them to eternal pain and torment. [/quote]
God is evil? Not even close. Notice what God inspired Peter to write at 2 Peter 3:5-8:
"5 For, according to their wish, this fact escapes their notice, that there were heavens from of old and an earth standing compactly out of water and in the midst of water by the word of God; 6 and by those [means] the world of that time suffered destruction when it was deluged with water. 7 But by the same word the heavens and the earth that are now are stored up for fire and are being reserved to the day of judgment and of destruction of the ungodly men.
8 However, let this one fact not be escaping YOUR notice, beloved ones, that one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day. 9 Jehovah is not slow respecting his promise, as some people consider slowness, but he is patient with YOU because he does not desire any to be destroyed but desires all to attain to repentance.

God does not desire any to be destroyed but desires people to repent and live.

I thought I explained it pretty well in one of my post that that test was not unfair, tempting or burdensome. The test did not become a temptation until Satan tempted Eve. The Playboy analogy was not even close to the test God set up in the garden.

Yes the penalty of death given to Adam did pass to all of his descendants but God has provided a way to undo the effects of sin and death by given his only begotten son. Exercising faith in Jesus and following whats outlined in the Bible allows our sins to be continually forgiven.
Act 3:19 states:
“19 Repent, therefore, and turn around so as to get your sins blotted out.”

Ezekiel 33:16 states:
“16 None of his sins with which he has sinned will be remembered against him. Justice and righteousness are what he has carried on. He will positively keep living.”

1 John 1:7 states:
“However, if we are walking in the light as he himself is in the light, we do have a sharing with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin.”

Those are just a few scriptures that shows that once God forgives us of a sin they are blotted out just like you would use Wite-Out to remove text on a piece of paper. They are wiped away and not called to God’s mind. And if you’re walking in the light meaning if you’re in an approved state by God, Jesus’ sacrifice continually cleanses us of sin. Now that is a loving God.

God would never burn and torment even the worst sinner forever in a place called Hell. Capped, there is no place called Hell mentioned anywhere in the Bible. When one dies and pays the penalty that they inherited from Adam they are given a clean slate. There sins are blotted out, wiped away. Acts 24:15 states “that there is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.” So people who were bad before they died are going to get a second chance. How can that be? Roman 6:23 states that the “wages sin pays is death” so once one has died they have payed the price for sinning by dying. That’s why Romans 6:7(NIV) states “anyone who has died has been freed from sin.”
Capped, can you see how loving that is? The penalty that was given to Adam was dying and returning to dust not burning forever in a place of torment. Romans 5:12 states that through one man sin entered into the world and death(returning back to dust)through sin, thus death spread to all men. This death that spread to all Adam’s descendant passed to us due to no fault of our own. So that is why when one dies God is going to give that person a second chance and if one is in an approved state with God, when he removes the wicked that are still alive(ones who have not paid the Adamic penalty) at armegeddon those in an approved state will survive. That is love.

I can understand you thinking a God that would burn sinners forever in Hell is evil. But this is not what the Bible teaches. That teaching slanders and maligns God because it is false. The teaching that God takes a mother or father from a child to be with him in heaven is another teaching that slanders and maligns God because it is not what the Bible teaches and it is false.

The God I’ve come to know and love from what’s in the Bible is a loving God that is patient and quick to forgive. He would never burn someone for all eternity for being bad 30 or 40 years and he would never cause the death of someone to be with him in heaven.

Capped, God created the universe along with the sun and earth before he created anything on earth. So yes the sun was necessary for plants to grow. And just because we don’t understand something doesn’t mean that it’s not true. Scientist do not understand the whole birth process. They don’t understand what makes sperm travel to the egg and what causes the egg to divide and start to form a fetus. They can observe the process but they don’t understand and can’t explain exactly what starts it and why. You still believe that humans are born everyday don’t you? So just because we can’t fully explain or understand something does not mean that it is not true.[/quote]

I was reading your post, and was trying to think what happens to a person who dies and does not follow Jesus. I remembered what you said. They just turn to dust. Nothing else happens to them. Have I interpreted you right this time?[/quote]
That is exactly what the Bible says happens. That is the Adamic penalty which was clearly stated to Adam by God at Genesis 3:19 which states that out of the ground Adam was taken “For dust you are and to dust you will return.” He did not state “your body will return to dust but your soul or spirit will be tormented forever in fire.” As a matter of fact Genesis 2:7 clearly states how man was made. The verse states that God proceded to form the man from dust of the ground. It does not state that man is formed from dust, spirit and a soul.

Once a human dies the Bible states there thoughts and emotions cease so they could not burn in a place of torment.
Ecclesiastes 9:5,6,10(NIV) states:
5 For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing; they have no further reward, and even the memory of them is forgotten. 6 Their love, their hate and their jealousy have long since vanished; never again will they have a part in anything that happens under the sun
verse 10 states:
10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might, for in the grave, where you are going, there is neither working nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom."
Those verses show that the dead have no emotion or thinking capabilities once they die.

Psalms 146:3(NIV) states:
“3 Do not put your trust in princes, in mortal men, who cannot save. 4 When their spirit departs, they return to the ground; on that very day their plans come to nothing.”
Those verses show that once they die their spirit or life-force leaves their body they return to the ground or dust and their plans or thoughts cease.

Ezekiel 18:3(NIV) states:
“3 For every living soul belongs to me, the father as well as the sonÃ?¢??both alike belong to me. The soul who sins is the one who will die.”
This verses shows that a living soul or person dies.

Ecclesiastes 3:20,21(NIV)
Man’s fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both: As one dies, so dies the other. All have the same breath (the footnote for breath at Bible.com states: Or spirit, my Bible translates breath as spirit) ;man has no advantage over the animal. Everything is meaningless. 20 All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return.”
Those verses show that at death man is not superior to the animals because they both have the same spirit and the same elements from dust that God used to make man he used to make animals and once both die they go to the same place which is dust.

Those are just a few scriptures that show once a human dies they return to dust and their thoughts cease so they could not be tormented in Hell or haunt anyone. So yes D the ghost that people see are wicked spirit beings and not dead people.[/quote]
Wow, no one wants to discuss.

I thought I’d hear things like: what about the lake of fire and sulpher?, what about the poor man and the Lazarus parable?, what about the firey furnace and the gnawing and gnashing of teeth?, If bad people get a second chance after death then what’s the point of being good?

Shocking![/quote]

I think we will get to this.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]Spartiates wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

You, being agnostic, and mse2us, being Jehovah’s Witness, have the same thoughts on this passage. You are not a Christian, but mse2us claims to be a Christian. I find this kind of ironic.[/quote]
Diggity D, I don’t know why you can’t understand this when I write it. Yes Jesus is divine. Any spirit being from heaven is divine. So I don’t deny Jesus is divine; he is divine. However, I do deny that Jesus is God Almighty because the Bible clearly states that they are two seperate spirit beings and God is head of Jesus(1 Corinthians 11:3) and Jesus is subject to God (1 Corinthians 15-24-28.

Do you now understand my position?[/quote]

M&M the word Divine means of or pertaining to a god, esp. the Supreme Being.

Angels are not divine. They are messengers of the Divine. So by Jesus claiming Divinity he is claiming to be God.

Jesus is 100% human and humans are subject to God. Why do you think Jesus humbled himself before God. Jesus is also 100% God which gives him the power to rule Heaven, Earth, and under the Earth.[/quote]


That is one definition of the word divine.

Below are several other definitions:

godlike; characteristic of or befitting a deity.

heavenly; celestial

Having the nature of or being a deity.

Superhuman; godlike

Look the word up in any dictionary and you’ll see the above definitions. D, just because you are used to associating “divine” with God Almighty only does not mean that the above definitions are wrong. Since you don’t know that these other definitions exist, from your perspective God Almighty is the only divine being. But you are incorrect. Any spirit being from heaven is divine. You are right that angels are messengers from God but that in no way means they are not divine.

[quote]cueball wrote:

You are correct. it is simple construction. And so Is 1:14. That is precisely my point. You are telling me that John is not claiming Jesus was divine by using your “reason/logic” translation. My point is that even with the substitution, 1:1 and 1:14 clearly show John stating Jesus is divine.
[/quote]

1:14 is not such a simple construction. That’s why most English translations have that awkward bracketed statement in them.

Do you want a clear translation or a literal one? As soon as you ask for a clear translation, you’re asking the translator to decide for you what something means where’s there’s ambiguity.

“And the logos became flesh and camped in us, and we beheld of the view, the view of one by the father, full of the quality of pleasure and truth.”

The author doesn’t even mention Jesus until 1:17

[quote]Spartiates wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

You are correct. it is simple construction. And so Is 1:14. That is precisely my point. You are telling me that John is not claiming Jesus was divine by using your “reason/logic” translation. My point is that even with the substitution, 1:1 and 1:14 clearly show John stating Jesus is divine.
[/quote]

1:14 is not such a simple construction. That’s why most English translations have that awkward bracketed statement in them.

Do you want a clear translation or a literal one? As soon as you ask for a clear translation, you’re asking the translator to decide for you what something means where’s there’s ambiguity.

“And the logos became flesh and camped in us, and we beheld of the view, the view of one by the father, full of the quality of pleasure and truth.”

The author doesn’t even mention Jesus until 1:17[/quote]

The name Jesus in the NIV doesn’t appear until 17 either. So what are you saying? Nothing you have posted has led me to believe John was NOT talking about Jesus.

Your above translation clearly states the Logos, or logic/reason, became flesh.

Your previous post about 1:1 says that the Logos, or logic/reason, was with God, and was God.

Pleas explain how this is not talking about Jesus. And don’t just retranslate again. I need you to EXPLAIN, in your own words, how this is not talking about Jesus.

[quote]Spartiates wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

You are correct. it is simple construction. And so Is 1:14. That is precisely my point. You are telling me that John is not claiming Jesus was divine by using your “reason/logic” translation. My point is that even with the substitution, 1:1 and 1:14 clearly show John stating Jesus is divine.
[/quote]

1:14 is not such a simple construction. That’s why most English translations have that awkward bracketed statement in them.

Do you want a clear translation or a literal one? As soon as you ask for a clear translation, you’re asking the translator to decide for you what something means where’s there’s ambiguity.

“And the logos became flesh and camped in us, and we beheld of the view, the view of one by the father, full of the quality of pleasure and truth.”

The author doesn’t even mention Jesus until 1:17[/quote]

Interesting, why did you use view instead of glory. The greek word that I see in no way implies the word view. Using the traditional strong’s lexicon I find this.

G1391
δοÌ?ξα
doxa
dox’-ah
From the base of G1380; glory (as very apparent), in a wide application (literally or figuratively, objectively or subjectively): - dignity, glory (-ious), honour, praise, worship.

However I did find this definition and can see view as being apart of it.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/Lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G1391&cscs=Jhn

However of all the times it is used in John none of them from what I can tell would use the word view as the translation. So why would the author change his style?
The only problem is it doesn’t jive with the rest of the verse. In particulare this

G3439
μονογενηÌ?Ï?
monogeneÌ?s
mon-og-en-ace
From G3441 and G1096; only born, that is, sole: - only (begotten, child).

That word is used 9 times in the NT and all nine times it referes to a physical person.
The phrase always refers to a son or child as well.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]Spartiates wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

You, being agnostic, and mse2us, being Jehovah’s Witness, have the same thoughts on this passage. You are not a Christian, but mse2us claims to be a Christian. I find this kind of ironic.[/quote]
Diggity D, I don’t know why you can’t understand this when I write it. Yes Jesus is divine. Any spirit being from heaven is divine. So I don’t deny Jesus is divine; he is divine. However, I do deny that Jesus is God Almighty because the Bible clearly states that they are two seperate spirit beings and God is head of Jesus(1 Corinthians 11:3) and Jesus is subject to God (1 Corinthians 15-24-28.

Do you now understand my position?[/quote]

M&M the word Divine means of or pertaining to a god, esp. the Supreme Being.

Angels are not divine. They are messengers of the Divine. So by Jesus claiming Divinity he is claiming to be God.

Jesus is 100% human and humans are subject to God. Why do you think Jesus humbled himself before God. Jesus is also 100% God which gives him the power to rule Heaven, Earth, and under the Earth.[/quote]


That is one definition of the word divine.

Below are several other definitions:

godlike; characteristic of or befitting a deity.

heavenly; celestial

Having the nature of or being a deity.

Superhuman; godlike

Look the word up in any dictionary and you’ll see the above definitions. D, just because you are used to associating “divine” with God Almighty only does not mean that the above definitions are wrong. Since you don’t know that these other definitions exist, from your perspective God Almighty is the only divine being. But you are incorrect. Any spirit being from heaven is divine. You are right that angels are messengers from God but that in no way means they are not divine.[/quote]

Only one of your definitions could possibly mean an angel. Only God is a divine deity. I would not give the title of diety to an angel. John was saying in John 1 that Jesus was a divine diety. Jesus is God, not was a god. I also would not give a god status to an angel. All the lords and gods you keep talking about are the rulers of the different lands here on earth. God/Jesus rules over Heaven, Earth, and under the Earth. You can interpret the bible anyway you want that is your free will, but remember to know of God does not mean you know God.

Seriously, this isn’t complicated. It’s stated plainly.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

18 No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Fatherâ??s side, has made him known.

The Word/the One and Only, whose Father is God, who was there from the beginning, became flesh and dwelt among them. Now what else did it say about the Word/One and only? Ah! Full of grace and and truth. But wait, wait! What name is given to the flesh which is dwelling among them? The flesh through which this grace and truth comes? Jesus…

It’s so plainly stated that I can’t begin to figure out how this became a topic.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Seriously, this isn’t complicated. It’s stated plainly.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

18 No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Fatherâ??s side, has made him known.

The Word/the One and Only, whose Father is God, who was there from the beginning, became flesh and dwelt among them. Now what else did it say about the Word/One and only. Ah, full of grace and and truth. But wait, wait, what name is given to the flesh which is dwelling among them? The flesh through which this grace and truth comes? Jesus…

It’s so plainly stated that I can’t begin to figure out how this became a topic.[/quote]

M&M check this out. Really good post Sloth by the way.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Seriously, this isn’t complicated. It’s plainly stated.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

18 No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.

The Word/the One and Only, whose Father is God, who was there from the beginning, became flesh and dwelt among them. Now what else did it say about the Word/One and only. Ah, full of grace and and truth. But wait, wait, what name is given to the flesh which is dwelling among them? The flesh through which this grace and truth comes? Jesus…

It’s so plainly stated that I can’t begin to figure out how this became a topic.[/quote]

I agree. But apparently Spartiates thinks his translation, somehow, completely changes the meaning. I’m just not seeing it.

Aye. Also note in verse 18; “…but GOD the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side…”

Speaks directly to the divinity.

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Seriously, this isn’t complicated. It’s plainly stated.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

18 No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.

The Word/the One and Only, whose Father is God, who was there from the beginning, became flesh and dwelt among them. Now what else did it say about the Word/One and only. Ah, full of grace and and truth. But wait, wait, what name is given to the flesh which is dwelling among them? The flesh through which this grace and truth comes? Jesus…

It’s so plainly stated that I can’t begin to figure out how this became a topic.[/quote]

I agree. But apparently Spartiates thinks his translation, somehow, completely changes the meaning. I’m just not seeing it.
[/quote]

The things Paul was trying to weed out from the church in Colossae is what the agnostics, gnostics, and Jehovah’s Witness are preaching in this day in time.