Animal Lovers

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?
[/quote]

You fuckers need to stop saying this shit. It has absolutely nothing to do with the argument at hand.

Ooh interesting debate.

For clarification Vicomte, and let’s just remove the cute doggy from the scenario for the moment and focus on the deer, are you suggesting that the following two hunters are fundamentally the same?

Hunter Bill who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before getting a clean kill whereupon, with pride, they return home; gut, skin and share their bounty across the dinner table with the rest of the family.

Hunter Dave who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before purposefully shooting a deer in the ass and then tracking it to the spot where it lies lamed. There they poke it with sharp sticks till it’s bleeding profusely and before it’s dead they hang it from a tree and watch as the life ebbs out of it’s twitching body. Proud, they return home empty handed and show pictures to their mates of their handiwork.

One of the above hunters is following a primal tradition that some would argue played a major role in the evolution of our species. The other is doing nothing of the sort.

It’s all about motive. The hunter who hunts for food, the sadist who goes out to cause suffering just for the sake of suffering and the merciful who puts down an animal who is surely suffering are all entirely different entities. I would say the differences here are hardly arbitrary.


I have two pitbulls. Love them both to death. One is a male red-nose, and the other is a female blue-nose. The male (Charlie) is a total sweetheart. He loves to play fetch and loves to play with anybody that will give him attention. He also has the most stunning brown/red fur I’ve ever seen on a dog. His eyes are also hard not to get lost in.

The blue-nose (Roxi) is even nicer than the other one, when she wants to be. She hates strangers (and black people for some reason?), but once she gets used to you, she’ll crawl right up to you and lay all over you. She’s the sweetest dog I’ve ever had, cute as could be, too.

They’re so misunderstood, too. Every time you hear about a pitbull attacking someone, it’s because the owner was a fucking moron.

CS

Me and Puppy Wuppy fishing-
She has chilled out a lot in her old age.


She spots a bear down the creek-

Then taunts it.

But she was saddened that it didn’t want to play. Sad puppy wuppy :frowning:

[quote]Stern wrote:
Ooh interesting debate.

For clarification Vicomte, and let’s just remove the cute doggy from the scenario for the moment and focus on the deer, are you suggesting that the following two hunters are fundamentally the same?

Hunter Bill who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before getting a clean kill whereupon, with pride, they return home; gut, skin and share their bounty across the dinner table with the rest of the family.

Hunter Dave who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before purposefully shooting a deer in the ass and then tracking it to the spot where it lies lamed. There they poke it with sharp sticks till it’s bleeding profusely and before it’s dead they hang it from a tree and watch as the life ebbs out of it’s twitching body. Proud, they return home empty handed and show pictures to their mates of their handiwork.

One of the above hunters is following a primal tradition that some would argue played a major role in the evolution of our species. The other is doing nothing of the sort.

It’s all about motive. The hunter who hunts for food, the sadist who goes out to cause suffering just for the sake of suffering and the merciful who puts down an animal who is surely suffering are all entirely different entities. I would say the differences here are hardly arbitrary.

[/quote]

I already ran this thing out in the other animal thread, so I’ll keep this brief.

We’re talking about torturing versus killing an animal, not torturing/killing versus killing.

Now, while their may be differences in the motives of the humans in question, to the deer, motive is completely irrelevant. The deer is having a fucked day no matter what.

Ignoring the motives (which, again, have absolutely no relevance to the deer), I’m saying killing is worse than torture that does not result in death, as they are both unnecessary in this modern day and age. Difference being hunting is considered socially acceptable, whereas torture is not. Either way, still fucking sucks for the deer.

Does that make sense? I really don’t have the energy.

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?
[/quote]

You fuckers need to stop saying this shit. It has absolutely nothing to do with the argument at hand.

[/quote]

Um, yes, it does.

Whether you like it or not, empathy towards animals is a human trait and someone who lacks it might end up with a selection of heads stored in his fridge in case he wants a blowjob.

There is a very good reason to avoid people displaying such behaviors.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?
[/quote]

You fuckers need to stop saying this shit. It has absolutely nothing to do with the argument at hand.

[/quote]

Um, yes, it does.

Whether you like it or not, empathy towards animals is a human trait and someone who lacks it might end up with a selection of heads stored in his fridge in case he wants a blowjob.

There is a very good reason to avoid people displaying such behaviors.
[/quote]

Fantastic!

Also, completely irrelevant.

But thanks.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?
[/quote]

True, but there are also millions of little boys out there torturing bugs and other lowly creatures because they can. Nearly all of them end up being normal, well-adjusted adults.

But people are hypocrites like that. Kill some bugs? No big deal. Throw a couple bettas in a bowl together and watch them battle to the death? Not a problem. Kill pigs for food? Fine. Kill dogs for food? Uncultured neanderthals! How dare you!

[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?
[/quote]

True, but there are also millions of little boys out there torturing bugs and other lowly creatures because they can. Nearly all of them end up being normal, well-adjusted adults.

But people are hypocrites like that. Kill some bugs? No big deal. Throw a couple bettas in a bowl together and watch them battle to the death? Not a problem. Kill pigs for food? Fine. Kill dogs for food? Uncultured neanderthals! How dare you![/quote]

THANK YOU.

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?
[/quote]

You fuckers need to stop saying this shit. It has absolutely nothing to do with the argument at hand.

[/quote]

Um, yes, it does.

Whether you like it or not, empathy towards animals is a human trait and someone who lacks it might end up with a selection of heads stored in his fridge in case he wants a blowjob.

There is a very good reason to avoid people displaying such behaviors.
[/quote]

Fantastic!

Also, completely irrelevant.

But thanks.[/quote]

You are crying hypocrisy when there is no hypocrisy involved.

These are indeed two different scenarios, even for the deer, but especially for other humans that are involved. Someone who lacks empathy is dangerous and not just for animals.

Also, I am very suspicious when it comes to a “rational” approach to moral instincts.

They might be fuzzy, they might be somewhat contradictory, but they have been hammered into our genome for a reason.

[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Vicomte wrote:

[quote]Hodge_Podge18 wrote:
By the way, that dog didn’t just have a bad day. It no longer has a fucking mouth. I can try and post the picture if your smart ass wants to see if a dog having no muzzle is somehow worse than a deer dying.[/quote]

Fuck me.

Let me explain this in a way you can understand.

Deer is animal.

Dog is animal.

Dog get boo boo is hurt. Dog have no mouth is sad.

Deer get died killed.

Deer can no be sad because DEER IS FUCKING DEAD.

But deer no personal widdle cute pet so deer died killed okay.

Dog fetchy newspaper make cute facebook picture, so doggie puppy no mouth BAD BAD.

Okie Dokie?[/quote]

Hurting animals for no good reason = early warning sign for sociopathy.

Okie Dokie?
[/quote]

True, but there are also millions of little boys out there torturing bugs and other lowly creatures because they can. Nearly all of them end up being normal, well-adjusted adults.

But people are hypocrites like that. Kill some bugs? No big deal. Throw a couple bettas in a bowl together and watch them battle to the death? Not a problem. Kill pigs for food? Fine. Kill dogs for food? Uncultured neanderthals! How dare you![/quote]

Bugs and fish are a bit too removed from human beings, but the very second someone starts with cats, dogs, horses, whatever you got a budding Dahmer on your hands.

Most likely he will merely become a career politician, but who knows?

For all I care, you can eat as many dogs as you like, what you cannot do is torture them first.

This is an interesting clip some of you might find interesting…

[quote]Evolv wrote:
This is an interesting clip some of you might find interesting…

I’m pretty dense but one thing I’ve managed to learned is you should never piss a chimp off.