[quote]pushharder wrote:
Flop, you get no respect on this forum much less that of the intellectual variety. Without a doubt you are the biggest blabbering idiot on PWI, with or without your Mensa card. You are not even close to being as smart as your cognitively dissonant cranial cavity thinks it is.
God help those around you on a daily basis – friends (are they even possible?), family, waitresses, bartenders, Denny’s dishwashers, etc. – you must leave quite the wake behind you as you stumble through your miserable life. I truly pity you and those who must encounter you.
Did your bout with cancer somehow create this diarrhea of the mouth syndrome of yours or were you actually worse in this regard before your unfortunate time? Seriously, sport, you need some counseling because you’re an ill, weaselly, cocksucking, little syphylitic cunthair. It has nothing to do with politics or philosophy or website fora, you’re just simply messed up in the head. You’re what’s colloquially known as a sick fuck.[/quote]
At the end of a campaign that saw Sawant promise to push for a $15-an-hour municipal minimum wage, Boeing announced that unless it got major concessions from the machinists and deep tax breaks from the state Legislature, it would look elsewhere for a site to build its 777X airliner.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Socialist to occupy Seattle City Council.
At the end of a campaign that saw Sawant promise to push for a $15-an-hour municipal minimum wage, Boeing announced that unless it got major concessions from the machinists and deep tax breaks from the state Legislature, it would look elsewhere for a site to build its 777X airliner.
Utah is apparently one of the two finalists for the new Boeing facility when they move…5,000 new jobs.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Socialist to occupy Seattle City Council.
At the end of a campaign that saw Sawant promise to push for a $15-an-hour municipal minimum wage, Boeing announced that unless it got major concessions from the machinists and deep tax breaks from the state Legislature, it would look elsewhere for a site to build its 777X airliner.
Maybe the 2 party system isn’t all that bad if the alternative is a socialist. At least she is honest.
About god damned time…now the potty trained politicians can actually do something…very nice move![/quote]
So what is next? They used this type of maneuver to get the ACA passed. Yeah the minority has no say in the Democratic Party. The ass beating the left gets in 2014 is going to be funny as hell.
[/quote]
LOL I have no doubt you actually believe this…that tea party is going to come save the day and give the GOP control of the Senate…sometimes I wish I lived in your simple little world D. Remember your dumbass claim last month that everyone would be blaming the Dems for the government shutdown? How’d that turn out for ya, Miss Cleo? You should stick to your day job and leave the prognostications to people that live in reality…[/quote]
Now what is next? Dems are already calling for it one day after.
About god damned time…now the potty trained politicians can actually do something…very nice move![/quote]
So what is next? They used this type of maneuver to get the ACA passed. Yeah the minority has no say in the Democratic Party. The ass beating the left gets in 2014 is going to be funny as hell.
[/quote]
LOL I have no doubt you actually believe this…that tea party is going to come save the day and give the GOP control of the Senate…sometimes I wish I lived in your simple little world D. Remember your dumbass claim last month that everyone would be blaming the Dems for the government shutdown? How’d that turn out for ya, Miss Cleo? You should stick to your day job and leave the prognostications to people that live in reality…[/quote]
Now what is next? Dems are already calling for it one day after.
[/quote]
Perhaps the RINO Tea Party will get their heads out of their ass and it won’t come to that, but if it does, I can only hope the Dems have the balls to put those fuckers in their place. Actions have consequences, and if the actions of those cry baby morons you have posters of up on your bedroom wall grind the government to a hault by refusing to do their jobs, the consequences will be they are not welcome at the adult table.
Please explain to all of us how life will be any different in the political world, as it pertains to the current topic, if the GOP takes the Senate in 2014? Please point out the differences between the pre-nuclear option of blocking all nominees and the post 2014 election option of…wait for it…blocking all nominees!!!
The status quo is the same you idiot. These fuckers are not doing their jobs now to “advise and consent” to the Executive’s nominees. How exactly will things change if they somehow manage to take the Senate? LOL
Your post makes no fucking sense you illiterate moron.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
…while you cackle at yourself perceived superb sense of humor.
[/quote]
^^^LOL Learn to write at a 3rd grade level before addressing me again, please.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
If so you have a little over 12 months to fellate yourself with your customary glee while you cackle at yourself perceived superb sense of humor. [/quote]
How do you expect him to cackle while self-fellating?
dat ad hom… So glad I clicked on this thread, lol.
Anywho, I don’t see how using the tools available to the minority party to resist those things they are opposed to is “not doing their jobs.” I mean a reasonable person would conclude it is, in fact, very much doing their jobs as they see need to be done.
I don’t know. I don’t have a habit of instantly insulting and holding myself above people I disagree with, so maybe I’m wrong.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
dat ad hom… So glad I clicked on this thread, lol.
Anywho, I don’t see how using the tools available to the minority party to resist those things they are opposed to is “not doing their jobs.” I mean a reasonable person would conclude it is, in fact, very much doing their jobs as they see need to be done.
I don’t know. I don’t have a habit of instantly insulting and holding myself above people I disagree with, so maybe I’m wrong. [/quote]
Nah, beating around the bush like a passive aggressive cunt is much more honorable.
In your own words, what do you think the term “advise and consent” actually means?
Do you see much consenting going on while these guys are “doing their jobs as they see need to be done”?
Do you think they would be “doing their job” of non-consent if Romney were occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Ave?
Would they still hold the opinion that the court is full enough and no longer needs any more judges appointed to it?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
dat ad hom… So glad I clicked on this thread, lol.
Anywho, I don’t see how using the tools available to the minority party to resist those things they are opposed to is “not doing their jobs.” I mean a reasonable person would conclude it is, in fact, very much doing their jobs as they see need to be done.
I don’t know. I don’t have a habit of instantly insulting and holding myself above people I disagree with, so maybe I’m wrong. [/quote]
Nah, beating around the bush like a passive aggressive cunt is much more honorable.
In your own words, what do you think the term “advise and consent” actually means?
Do you see much consenting going on while these guys are “doing their jobs as they see need to be done”?
Do you think they would be “doing their job” of non-consent if Romney were occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Ave?
Would they still hold the opinion that the court is full enough and no longer needs any more judges appointed to it? [/quote]
A better question is why any president nominates a judge with a strong bias to either side. A more political neutral judge would have no reason to get blocked by the senate. It is their job to decide cases based on the material presented to them, not vote based on their political party’s stance on whatever issue comes up.
