[quote]lixy wrote:
btm62 wrote:
As opposed to the way more unspeakable violence by muslim terrorists or insurgents or whackjobs?
I don’t support the terrorists.
You support the US army.
Can’t you see the huge flaw in your argument?
No I guess I don’t. I certainly do support the US Army. They are my borthers and friends. You are supporting your side, if not just by the simple fact that you cannot admit for some bizarre reason that US Army is NOT the MAIN cause of civilian casualties anywhere in the Middle East.
Are members or Al-Mahdi’s group blowing themselves up and/or killing civilians? Prove your 10% figure. I call bullshit on that.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2007/0710.tilghman.html
The State Department estimates Al Qaeda in Iraq at from 850 �?? about 3 to 5 percent of the Sunni insurgency �?? to a few thousand.
That is only Al-Qaeda. And you qoute me figures from the US State Department. Oh, now we are so accurate that you feel compelled to bitch about them and use their stats as a source in the same argument. Nice. Governments are like ex wives. If their lips are moving, they are lying.
Not once did I mention that. That is your agenda trap bullshit. Although I think it can be included. “Classic case of logical fallacy?” Again I’d appreciate if you would stick to the point.
What does a people resisting the only way they can in the face of the Zionist occupier have to do with a bunch of whackjobs determined to spread terror around the world?
Zionist occupier? Was that what it said in the pamphlet.
Maybe we are “Running Dogs”. People resisting is one thing. Blowing up innocent civilians is quite another. And…we’re back to the main point again!
Terrorists are one thing. Palestinian resistance inside the occupied territories is another.
I don’t give two thrusts into a cats butt about the Palestinians. Maybe the other Arabs could help em out a little bit. This is what happens when you get your ass handed to you in a war. I don’t care to go on and on about this topic cause I’m not a big fan of the Israeli’s either and my point can be made without even bringing this whole cluster into the realm ya know?
Well the government or organization, PLO, Hamas…etc… gives cash to the family of the suicide bomber.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the US hand out cash to the family of a fallen soldier. Now, what’s the difference between somebody destroying civilian buildings with an F-16 and the Palestinian suicide bombers?
So now your changing the tables again? Are you a frickin lawyer or what? Just tell me the argument was a strawman and move on. I’ll understand.
On a side note, you may wanna look up the verb “to reimburse”.
Thank you Mrs. Othmar I think I understand the word just fine.
Yes, I’ve heard this talking point many times. So what?
So what?
Saddam was a secular mo-fo who hung Islamists by their balls. The Al-Sauds are fundamentalist and absolutist nut-jobs with known ties to terrorist organizations.
The Al-Sauds now? Who cares for purposes of this post and discussion. Take a ritalin.
If you can’t see the problem with turning Iraq into a safe haven for terrorists, there’s no helping you.
WTF?
What is the point of this sentence?
To show you that I’m in no way responsible for any innocent deaths. Your tax-money and neo-con-cheerleading on the other hand…
If it helps you feel better okay? I don’t think I’m a neo-con. Can I be a neo-con and a zionist? Shit, I’m gonna need a huge business card. C’mon Lixy. As far as my taxes go, they go to a lot of shit I don’t support. Your hands aren’t all together clean either.
The US army and its murderous war is financed and supported by the American populace.
Last I looked support for the war was not that strong by the American populace. The government maybe.
Not anymore. Back in 2003, the majority of Americans supported the obliterating and invasion of Iraq thanks to a carefully crafted propaganda. Remember Cheney linking Saddam to 9/11? Remember the WMDs?
I think we supported removing Saddam’s government thru military force. For all of the subsequent rhetoric the end justifying the means could still be applicable here. Time will tell. Again, for this post I don’t care to argue all the reasons and lies about the Iraq war. “Your side” is still killing more civilians than we are and your viewpoint is very one sided. AND…we’re back on topic.
That sounds about par for your course. I’m not trying to hold you responsible for anything other than you seem to be in denial about the fact that the side that you support has killed more civilians than the side you hate.
I don’t support any faction that harms innocents. However, I am sick and tired of shedding tears for the Americans who get blown up in Iraq. It’s not their land. They have no business dictating the rules there. And don’t get me started on the mercenaries…
And I’m tired of hearing about how the US accidentally kills 2 civilians in a WAR zone and on the same page I get an article that tells me that a suicide bomber blew up 158 people in a crowded market and you wanna sit and criticize and demonize ONLY the american soldier. Its wrong. End of story. There is a difference!
Not necessarily. An insurgent, to me, is someone from out of country fighting against US forces. I suppose it could include Iraqi’s, but there we would have to draw some sort of idealogical motivation for further classification.
That didn’t make the least bit of sense, now did it. Are the insurgents “from out of country” or do they “include Iraqi’s” (sic)? If the latter, then we’re back to my previous definition: Anyone shooting at US forces is an insurgent. And to think that the people of an occupied country don’t have the right to resist is simply preposterous.
Resist by blowing up civilians? Piss on your stupid definition, stick to point. Whoever is blowing up civilians…martians, numbnuts, blue eyed cheerleaders…whatever you want to call them…the shit is wrong and you know it, and you’d rather sit and talk about the 2 civilians the US killed rather than the 158 in the market. (Those by the way we’re probably not an accident.)
And…we’re back to the point.
Who and where is this legitimate Iraqi resistance? Are they blowing themselves up? Killing civilians? If they are I feel comfortable lumping them together for purposes of accusing of you of refusing to see that the side you support kills more civilians than the US.
Let’s please differentiate between people blowing themselves up with the intent of killing civilians and the ones doing the same to take out US forces.
OKAY!@
Now that it’s done, I’ll totally agree with you. Anyone harming civilians should be taken out. And let me remind you that the US army has done more than its fair share at killing and maiming civilians, sometimes on purpose.
YOu remind us at every opportunity. I think the other side is ahead on that scoreboard though. And…the point again.
Send pictures. Are you hot?
Nice retort.
I have a very nice retort. Hard as a rock. (Lots of deads and stuff.) Wanna cop a feel?
I meant try bombing the town I reside in and see the size of my balls for yourself.
Blow my head up? That’ll leave a mark!
Sheesh! You’re being silly.
I feel a love smack on my bottom coming on.
Muslims have a lot of blood on their hands too. Their policies are bullying and violent and chickenshit and kill more civilians than the US. That is what I am denouncing.
And I’m right behind you. (no pun intended)
None taken.
I agree with this paragraph. I’m not arguing that.
Praise the lord!
I must say that I have no idea where you stood on the 2003 invasion. Did you support Bush’s decision to blow up Iraq?[/quote]
I think that Saddam being gone is a good thing. While I think Bush and his ilk have obvious greed motives for doing what they did, I believe that if the insurgency would dry up and let the people and the army rebuild the country, the infrastructure and such that the Iraqi people could perhaps enjoy a better standard of living than under Saddam. (Japan style.) I believe that few people in that region are ready for democratic government. I believe that is a process that must occur naturally within a society and cannot be forced upon them. I think that is a good lesson that can be learned from the situation. While the motives of the government are suspect, I believe a VAST majority of our troops believe basically what I do and want to help. I believe this because I know them.