The US media whores the shit out of the word Terrorist after 9’11 and the rest of the world caught on.
Just remember ones mans Terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
And you are not wrong. Morocco does indeed export oil. 21,890 barrels a day, to be precise. [/quote]
That’s quite recent. It most certainly wasn’t the case at the peak of Soviet influence.
And to be even more precise, the country imports 192,500 barrels a day.
Not to mention that the barrels you speak of are from the Western Sahara, control of which has been disputed by Morocco and the POLISARIO ever since the Spanish colonizers left.
That support is ongoing, and is the main obstacle to democratize the place.
Gee…I wonder why? Could it be that the local dictator was the first foreign head of state to recognize the sovereignty of the United States?
Meanwhile, Moroccans have to put up with US-sponsored Alaouite dictatorship. And considering the scale of atrocities in, say “Soviet dictatorship” fallen Algeria, I’m pretty sure Moroccans got the short end of the stick.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
That’s funny. I seem to fit the profile pretty closely, except that I don’t have a balaclava, a Kalashnikov, and Rhodesian camouflage fatigues like the fellow in the picture.
[/quote]
Us modern cool militia types get 6.8mm spc’s, molle gear, Eotech sights, and get Ghillie suits from Cabelas. Of course you’re M14 semi is cool, but not AK cool, haha!
This article makes me sick. Surely it has to be a joke? from the onion or something?
It is basically telling you what you are allowed to think and believe, not just what you are allowed to say or do.
cripey
[quote]lixy wrote:
You’re part of a military force that’s deployed all over the world for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony. This involves violence, the threat of violence and terrorizes innocent civilians.
So, yes, you are a terrorist![/quote]
You’re part of a religious force that’s deployed all over the world for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony. This involves violence, the threat of violence and terrorizes innocent civilians.
As a matter of fact one of your buddies over at CAIR beheaded his wife. http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/story/bridges_tv_ceo_arrested_for_beheading_wife_received/
And your homies over in Europe have been raping like mad:
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1609
If you really want me to keep going I’m sure I can find more acts of terror that have been committed in the name of your religion that took place before Americawas even a country.
[quote]tom63 wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
That’s funny. I seem to fit the profile pretty closely, except that I don’t have a balaclava, a Kalashnikov, and Rhodesian camouflage fatigues like the fellow in the picture.
Us modern cool militia types get 6.8mm spc’s, molle gear, Eotech sights, and get Ghillie suits from Cabelas. Of course you’re M14 semi is cool, but not AK cool, haha!
[/quote]
I ordered a Robinson XCR.
[quote]jawara wrote:
You’re part of a religious force that’s deployed all over the world for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony. [/quote]
Come again?
I am nobody’s minion. I do not, nor have I ever used, violence, the threat of violence or terrorized innocent civilians.
Nobody expects me to follow their orders or do their bidding, and I will shit on anybody who does.
Anyone who beheads an innocent is most certainly not one of my “buddies”.
Any people who rape, for any reason, are not my “homies”.
So? What’s this got to do with me, my sweat, my money or my allegiances?
Don’t try to compare our situations. I am a free man.
Many times hammers have been used to kill people, hitting them on the head, clubbing them to death.
Therefore, ALL hammers are evil.
Or to put it another way, regardless of what atrocities are done in the name of religion, or culture, or a country, at any time, or in the present, does not mean that all people of that religion, culture or country are guilty of it - even if they partially agree with it or condemn it.
We are each responsible for our own actions only and should not be expected to pay for the actions of others.
Punishing people for what they ~might~ do, or what you think they might do, or what they think, or what you THINK they think is ultimate terrorism.
[quote]Magarhe wrote:
Punishing people for what they ~might~ do, or what you think they might do, or what they think, or what you THINK they think is ultimate terrorism. [/quote]
Truth.
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
lixy wrote:
You’re part of a military force that’s deployed all over the world for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony. This involves violence, the threat of violence and terrorizes innocent civilians.
You know, Lixy, you’re going to get me feeling you deserve to live under Soviet dictatorship, and sorry that we saved your sorry ass from that.
I take that back: I DO feel you deserve to live under Soviet dictatorship.
However, I’m not quite at the point of being sorry that we saved you from it. Keep up your shit though and you will accomplish that mission as well.[/quote]
I can think of over 100,000 people that you could send to this new Soviet Republic:
It’s a profile. Like those used for serial killers, child molesters, arsonists, etc.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
It’s a profile. [/quote]
Couldn’t anything be a profile with a negative label put on it?
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Sloth wrote:
It’s a profile.
Couldn’t anything be a profile with a negative label put on it?[/quote]
Well, yes. But, we aren’t going to outlaw observation, are we? So, if I observe through research, and/or even experience, that there are some warning signs I could watch for to identify potential threats to my life, what then? Convict me of hate thoughts?
[quote]Sloth wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Sloth wrote:
It’s a profile.
Couldn’t anything be a profile with a negative label put on it?
Well, yes. But, we aren’t going to outlaw observation, are we? So, if I observe through research, and/or even experience, that there are some warning signs I could watch for to identify potential threats to my life, what then? Convict me of hate thoughts?
[/quote]
When has you or anyone “observed” a Ron Paul supporter killing or harming anyone? What threats could such people pose? Making you a free person, Oh yes I see how that could bother you, see you have to be responsible for yourself if you are a free person, no one to pick you up when you fall, or wipe your ass when you shit.
V
[quote]Vegita wrote:
Sloth wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Sloth wrote:
It’s a profile.
Couldn’t anything be a profile with a negative label put on it?
Well, yes. But, we aren’t going to outlaw observation, are we? So, if I observe through research, and/or even experience, that there are some warning signs I could watch for to identify potential threats to my life, what then? Convict me of hate thoughts?
When has you or anyone “observed” a Ron Paul supporter killing or harming anyone? What threats could such people pose? Making you a free person, Oh yes I see how that could bother you, see you have to be responsible for yourself if you are a free person, no one to pick you up when you fall, or wipe your ass when you shit.
V
[/quote]
Well, if you’re a white male in your 20’s-30’s, I assume your freedom is threatened by serial killer profiles…I mean that’s a whole lot more general than being a masked, camo-wearing, rifle toting, Ron Paul supporter!
Hate thoughts!
[quote]Vegita wrote:
Sloth wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Sloth wrote:
It’s a profile.
Couldn’t anything be a profile with a negative label put on it?
Well, yes. But, we aren’t going to outlaw observation, are we? So, if I observe through research, and/or even experience, that there are some warning signs I could watch for to identify potential threats to my life, what then? Convict me of hate thoughts?
When has you or anyone “observed” a Ron Paul supporter killing or harming anyone? What threats could such people pose? Making you a free person, Oh yes I see how that could bother you, see you have to be responsible for yourself if you are a free person, no one to pick you up when you fall, or wipe your ass when you shit.
V
[/quote]
Ron Paul was supported by the Stormfront leader.
Not like he needed that 500 bucks anyways. And yea i will say building a website around promoting violence to entire groups of people, and promoting a childrens based website around that same idea is harming.
Had he not done that, I probably would have voted for him.
[quote]jawara wrote:
You’re part of a religious force that’s deployed all over the world for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony. [/quote]
“…for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony.”?
Not sure I follow. Please explain.
Hey Jawara, you were in the US military, did you ever under orders or not, don civilian clothing and purposefully execute unarmed men, women and children? Or plant a bomb or a mine in a spot exclusively to target civilians?
Then you ain’t a terrorist, buddy.
[quote]PB-Crawl wrote:
Ron Paul was supported by the Stormfront leader.
Not like he needed that 500 bucks anyways. And yea i will say building a website around promoting violence to entire groups of people, and promoting a childrens based website around that same idea is harming.
Had he not done that, I probably would have voted for him.[/quote]
What website promoting violence? Ron Paul made a site other than his campaign site?
???
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
jawara wrote:
You’re part of a religious force that’s deployed all over the world for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony.
“…for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony.”?
Not sure I follow. Please explain.
Hey Jawara, you were in the US military, did you ever under orders or not, don civilian clothing and purposefully execute unarmed men, women and children? Or plant a bomb or a mine in a spot exclusively to target civilians?
Then you ain’t a terrorist, buddy.[/quote]
If you say so.
Does he or does he not belong to an organization that enforced an embargo that killed 500000 children?
Does he or does he not belong to an organization that regularily kills in the name of spreading an ideology, i.e. “freedom and democracy”?
Does he or does he not belong to an organization that has killed more civilians as “collateral damage” than all “terrorist attacks” have killed combined, multiplied with a factor of 10000 or so?
[quote]orion wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
jawara wrote:
You’re part of a religious force that’s deployed all over the world for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony.
“…for the purpose of strengthening, and/or maintaining US hegemony.”?
Not sure I follow. Please explain.
Hey Jawara, you were in the US military, did you ever under orders or not, don civilian clothing and purposefully execute unarmed men, women and children? Or plant a bomb or a mine in a spot exclusively to target civilians?
Then you ain’t a terrorist, buddy.
If you say so. [/quote]
Thing is, for invading forces to kill unarmed people is exceptional.