Ahmadinejad: 'Annihilate Israel'

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Well, let’s annihilate the Iranian regime.

[/quote]

Lots of Iranian would appreciate it, if done the right way. [/quote]

And not by US or Israel.[/quote]

Dunno, Baywatch, hamburgers, internet porn.

Those Iranians are not allowed to have satellite dishes, but their rooftops look like hedgehogs.

Also, their population is very young on average.

Swamp them with Glee episodes and HFCS sodas, make profit -???- make still more profit.

I still dont get why you cannot make a buck toppling a regime.

For the cost of two cruise missiles I have you all Glee episodes translated and broadcasted into Teheran.
[/quote]

Oh, is this what Ahmadinejad had in mind? Hamburgers and “Glee?”[/quote]

Na, that does not work in Israel, they already have high quality porn.

The Iranians however have not, so if you want to topple them, yes, I am quite serious that Dallas and Baywatch did a better job at toppling regimes than all actions of the US state department combined.

Glee is what I would use today to target a younger audience. [/quote]

Well what food products and TV shows do you think Ahmadinejad has in mind when he speaks of Iran and the world annihilating the Zionist regime?[/quote]

None?

Why would I think that at all?[/quote]

Then what do you think he means?[/quote]

That he wants the Zionist Regime (OMGZ!!!) to dissappear from the pages of time just like the Eastern Empire and the Regime of the Sha.

Since the article claims that he “already called for the destruction of Israel once”, in 2005, you can look that speech up to see what he said.

Incidentally I happened to post it in its entirety not three days ago on this here board!

[Sloth]

[quote]orion wrote:

That he wants the Zionist Regime (OMGZ!!!) to dissappear …

[/quote]

Like, poof, disappear? Annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like waiting for some spontaneous event. So, what does he mean by annihilate? By what actions?

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

That he wants the Zionist Regime (OMGZ!!!) to dissappear …

[/quote]

Like, poof, disappear? Annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like waiting for some spontaneous event. So, what does he mean by annihilate? By what actions?
[/quote]

How would I know?

Suddenly people want ME to interpret something into his speeches?

They are what they are.

BUT, if you want someone to read between, over, under and around the lines for you, I might have a few names for you.

[Sloth]

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

That he wants the Zionist Regime (OMGZ!!!) to dissappear …

[/quote]

Like, poof, disappear? Annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like waiting for some spontaneous event. So, what does he mean by annihilate? By what actions?
[/quote]

How would I know?

Suddenly people want ME to interpret something into his speeches?

They are what they are.

BUT, if you want someone to read between, over, under and around the lines for you, I might have a few names for you. [/quote]

Yes, how do you interpret the call to annihilate the Zionists who apparently are running the world (standard protocols conspiracy stuff)? A call to annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like a call to patience, hoping that one day the Zionists stop running the banks just because. Let’s say I’m curious. I mean, you say hamburgers and Baywatch logically couldn’t be what he has in mind. So, what is it?

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

That he wants the Zionist Regime (OMGZ!!!) to dissappear …

[/quote]

Like, poof, disappear? Annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like waiting for some spontaneous event. So, what does he mean by annihilate? By what actions?
[/quote]

How would I know?

Suddenly people want ME to interpret something into his speeches?

They are what they are.

BUT, if you want someone to read between, over, under and around the lines for you, I might have a few names for you. [/quote]

Yes, how do you interpret the call to annihilate the Zionists who apparently are running the world (standard protocols conspiracy stuff)? A call to annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like a call to patience, hoping that one day the Zionists stop running the banks just because. Let’s say I’m curious. I mean, you say hamburgers and Baywatch logically couldn’t be what he has in mind. So, what is it?
[/quote]

Ask him?

Given that Israel has enough nukes to turn Iran into a parking lot several times over, I would say it was some venting to pander to his audience.

He is, after all a politician.

[Sloth]

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

That he wants the Zionist Regime (OMGZ!!!) to dissappear …

[/quote]

Like, poof, disappear? Annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like waiting for some spontaneous event. So, what does he mean by annihilate? By what actions?
[/quote]

How would I know?

Suddenly people want ME to interpret something into his speeches?

They are what they are.

BUT, if you want someone to read between, over, under and around the lines for you, I might have a few names for you. [/quote]

Yes, how do you interpret the call to annihilate the Zionists who apparently are running the world (standard protocols conspiracy stuff)? A call to annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like a call to patience, hoping that one day the Zionists stop running the banks just because. Let’s say I’m curious. I mean, you say hamburgers and Baywatch logically couldn’t be what he has in mind. So, what is it?
[/quote]

Ask him?

Given that Israel has enough nukes to turn Iran into a parking lot several times over, I would say it was some venting to pander to his audience.

He is, after all a politician. [/quote]

So, he is pandering to the audience. What meaning did the audience expect? Do they want hamburgers and Baywatch smuggled into Israel? Was he pandering to their desire to sit back and wait for the Zionists to just, well, turn over a new leaf at some unforeseeable point in the future, when he called to annihilate the Zionist regime?

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

That he wants the Zionist Regime (OMGZ!!!) to dissappear …

[/quote]

Like, poof, disappear? Annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like waiting for some spontaneous event. So, what does he mean by annihilate? By what actions?
[/quote]

How would I know?

Suddenly people want ME to interpret something into his speeches?

They are what they are.

BUT, if you want someone to read between, over, under and around the lines for you, I might have a few names for you. [/quote]

Yes, how do you interpret the call to annihilate the Zionists who apparently are running the world (standard protocols conspiracy stuff)? A call to annihilate certainly doesn’t sound like a call to patience, hoping that one day the Zionists stop running the banks just because. Let’s say I’m curious. I mean, you say hamburgers and Baywatch logically couldn’t be what he has in mind. So, what is it?
[/quote]

Ask him?

Given that Israel has enough nukes to turn Iran into a parking lot several times over, I would say it was some venting to pander to his audience.

He is, after all a politician. [/quote]

So, he is pandering to the audience. What meaning did the audience expect? Do they want hamburgers and Baywatch smuggled into Israel? Was he pandering to their desire to sit back and wait for the Zionists to just, well, turn over a new leaf at some unforeseeable point in the future, when he called to annihilate the Zionist regime?
[/quote]

I imagine the audience reactions varied.

How would you think the audience interpreted this:

Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran

or this:

- YouTube

[Sloth]

So when he called for actively annihilating the Zionist regime, what did he mean Orion?

[Sloth]

You excused his wording as a pandering. What was he pandering to in the audience, Orion?

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

So when he called for actively annihilating the Zionist regime, what did he mean Orion?[/quote]

To make it perfectly clear, so many people on this here board have made an utter idiot of themselves in public by trying to divine what he tried to say that I am not really in the mood to join their ranks.

If I actually must speculate, I would say that he has no plan at all. He is a loudmouth without any real political power, in other words, he is a distraction.

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:
You excused his wording as a pandering. What was he pandering to in the audience, Orion? [/quote]

Their hate for Israel of course.

[Sloth]

[quote]orion wrote:

If I actually must speculate, I would say that he has no plan at all. He is a loudmouth without any real political power, in other words, he is a distraction.

[/quote]

And I won’t deny that’s a possibility. But it’s better to argue that then to pretend he’s talking about hamburgers, baywatch, or the Zionist word-runners having a change of heart. You’re better off acknowledging it’s a threat, if only one made to pander. Then, argue that mere threatening language (it is) isn’t worth a war and everything that comes with it. Fine. But dude, you lose the argument right off the bat by ‘fence sitting’ on the question of “annihilating the Zionist regime” being threatening language.

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

If I actually must speculate, I would say that he has no plan at all. He is a loudmouth without any real political power, in other words, he is a distraction.

[/quote]

And I won’t deny that’s a possibility. But it’s better to argue that then to pretend he’s talking about hamburgers, baywatch, or the Zionist word-runners having a change of heart. You’re better off acknowledging it’s a threat, if only one made to pander. Then, argue that mere threatening language (it is) isn’t worth a war and everything that comes with it. Fine. But dude, you lose the argument right off the bat by ‘fence sitting’ on the question of “annihilating the Zionist regime” being threatening language.
[/quote]

I sit on the fence on the question whether reading comprehension or selective reading techniques are more important when it comes to being a proper Catholic.

I do not sit at the fence at all when it comes to the question of whether he called for the physical annihilation of Israel or not and what the standards of the Western media are when it comes to their reporting it.

In case there is any doubt, he did not call for it and they suck donkey balls like they mean it.

That his is a less than neighborly attitude is certainly true, but you have mouth breathing dumbfucks in every population and his role is apparently to pander to the Iranian contingent.

[orion]

Its a theater.

He plays the crocodile.

If you do not have anything like the traditional harlequin theater that will make no sense whatsoever.

[Sloth]

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

If I actually must speculate, I would say that he has no plan at all. He is a loudmouth without any real political power, in other words, he is a distraction.

[/quote]

And I won’t deny that’s a possibility. But it’s better to argue that then to pretend he’s talking about hamburgers, baywatch, or the Zionist word-runners having a change of heart. You’re better off acknowledging it’s a threat, if only one made to pander. Then, argue that mere threatening language (it is) isn’t worth a war and everything that comes with it. Fine. But dude, you lose the argument right off the bat by ‘fence sitting’ on the question of “annihilating the Zionist regime” being threatening language.
[/quote]

I sit on the fence on the question whether reading comprehension or selective reading techniques are more important when it comes to being a proper Catholic.

I do not sit at the fence at all when it comes to the question of whether he called for the physical annihilation of Israel or not and what the standards of the Western media are when it comes to their reporting it.

In case there is any doubt, he did not call for it and they suck donkey balls like they mean it.

That his is a less than neighborly attitude is certainly true, but you have mouth breathing dumbfucks in every population and his role is apparently to pander to the Iranian contingent. [/quote]

Well, it’s certainly revealing as to who you’ll sit on the fence for.

[Sloth]

[quote]orion wrote:
Its a theater.

He plays the crocodile.

If you do not have anything like the traditional harlequin theater that will make no sense whatsoever.[/quote]

Ah, so he does play the ‘monster.’ The only question is, is he actually PLAYING.

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

If I actually must speculate, I would say that he has no plan at all. He is a loudmouth without any real political power, in other words, he is a distraction.

[/quote]

And I won’t deny that’s a possibility. But it’s better to argue that then to pretend he’s talking about hamburgers, baywatch, or the Zionist word-runners having a change of heart. You’re better off acknowledging it’s a threat, if only one made to pander. Then, argue that mere threatening language (it is) isn’t worth a war and everything that comes with it. Fine. But dude, you lose the argument right off the bat by ‘fence sitting’ on the question of “annihilating the Zionist regime” being threatening language.
[/quote]

I sit on the fence on the question whether reading comprehension or selective reading techniques are more important when it comes to being a proper Catholic.

I do not sit at the fence at all when it comes to the question of whether he called for the physical annihilation of Israel or not and what the standards of the Western media are when it comes to their reporting it.

In case there is any doubt, he did not call for it and they suck donkey balls like they mean it.

That his is a less than neighborly attitude is certainly true, but you have mouth breathing dumbfucks in every population and his role is apparently to pander to the Iranian contingent. [/quote]

Well, it’s certainly revealing as to who you’ll sit on the fence for. [/quote]

For Catholics!

In times like these, that is like having your back, practically.

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
Its a theater.

He plays the crocodile.

If you do not have anything like the traditional harlequin theater that will make no sense whatsoever.[/quote]

Ah, so he does play the ‘monster.’ The only question is, is he actually PLAYING.
[/quote]

The crocodile is not so much a monster, more like a slightly dumb, wannabe villain.

So the question is in my mind, can he do more than play pretend?

I say he cant.

[Sloth]

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
Its a theater.

He plays the crocodile.

If you do not have anything like the traditional harlequin theater that will make no sense whatsoever.[/quote]

Ah, so he does play the ‘monster.’ The only question is, is he actually PLAYING.
[/quote]

The crocodile is not so much a monster, more like a slightly dumb, wannabe villain.

So the question is in my mind, can he do more than play pretend?

I say he cant. [/quote]

But you do acknowledge that he is at least pretending.

[orion]

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
Its a theater.

He plays the crocodile.

If you do not have anything like the traditional harlequin theater that will make no sense whatsoever.[/quote]

Ah, so he does play the ‘monster.’ The only question is, is he actually PLAYING.
[/quote]

The crocodile is not so much a monster, more like a slightly dumb, wannabe villain.

So the question is in my mind, can he do more than play pretend?

I say he cant. [/quote]

But you do acknowledge that he is at least pretending. [/quote]

Ah, come on, this whole Jooooooooos, the banks, world domination bit…

I mean, that might sound fresh in Teheran, but we invented it.

However, blame Israel to draw attention away from your domestic problems, blame Iran to draw attention away from your domestic problems…

All the same, all the time…