AAS and CANCER

what about foetal cancer, thats sort of cool… you know those teratocarcinomes where you have tumors made of teeth, hair, bone, nails, skin and just random tissues. How often do these occur and what causes them?

WAnker - if you consider that there are a couple of trillion
cells in your body, a 99.9999% chance of something not happening means
there is a one in a million chance of it happening. There are a lot
of millions in a trillion.

what do you think?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but have we basically come to a consensus that low to moderate usage of AAS will give us not much more of a chance of dying via cancer than simply eating nitrate-laced beef jerky, or trans-fats, or inhaling the exhaust of a city’s cars?
Plus, many AAS users are far healthier and more diet/lifestyle conscious than non users, so the AAS could simply be a tool to get more healthy…

when I said 99.99999% I meant virtually impossible. Almost every cell in your body has some sort of defect that is non-deleterious and non-lethal. You still function normally.

You are always generating and regenerating parts of your body, so there is always an “out with the old, in with the new” type of thang happening. Think about your skin. You have any idea how many of those are dead skin cells? I don’t care to count, but it’s a lot. You will function normally.

I agree with Archaic in the fact that AAS is safe, but saying that most AAS users are healthier than others is a bad assumption.

I’ve really heard this more referred to GH specifically than AAS generally. ANd it’s not that it CAUSES cancer, but that it can lead to increased growth speed of an EXISTING cancerous tumor, because of the indescriminate stimulation of growth.

And the positives of AAS use in cancer patients are great, IF the cancer is already detected and under treatment.

Just my barely-educated opinion, based on a few conversations with doctors related to this topic.

I still believe than foetal/stem-cell cancer is the best form of cancer

Id just like to point out something: im the one who wrote that last reply, not the Retard, who is my brother. Im the one who writes retarted comments but, unlike my brother, I am not a retard. Quite ironic, isnt it?