9th Cir. Hostile to Religion?

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
21

[quote]vroom wrote:
Come on, one of these days try to back up your statements with something other than meaningless insults and characterizations. You realize those are purely emotional tactics that show nothing except your own mindset?

Are you in the midst of PCTs or something?[/quote]

They aren’t meaningless. They are very accurate illustrations of your pointless, fear-based ramblings on the thread.

You have not once mentioned the case at hand - only bloviating over your fear of religion and you perceived need to create an even greater distance between it and government.

I find your mindset so obtusely stupid that I cannot refrain from telling you just how obtusely stupid you are.

You and Dan the Rat are two peas in a pod, and I cannot seem to help myself. If either of you had half the fucking brains you thought you did, you would realize how utterly retarded you are.

22

[quote]rainjack wrote:
They aren’t meaningless. They are very accurate illustrations of your pointless, fear-based ramblings on the thread.[/quote]

So, now you throw out guesses, random darts, and then declare them accurate? Is this like declaring yourself the victor of a debate without actually having anything useful to add to it?

What is there to say about the case? A judge took a stance that generally seems out of line with established convention. It will probably be overturned.

Is there something in particular about the case you would like to see discussed? Maybe you should raise this all important issue instead of throwing insults like an impotent little child.

Mirror buddy. Look in one.

If you can’t find the words to express what you think and you have to hurl insults, or you have to make up my stance on issues instead of actually address mine, then you may want to reconsider… or not, it’s up to you.

Calling someone stupid because they don’t agree with you and you don’t have the capacity to show them the error of their ways, when they are perfectly willing to listen and discuss the topic, well, let’s just say the shortcoming is probably not mine.

Sniff. Did somebody hurt your feelings Rainjack?

For fuck sakes man, if you have something on topic to say, or something on topic that you want to discuss, then by all means, bring it.

So far you’ve accused me of things that aren’t true, made up little fantasy theories of what I think, thrown tons of childish insults and generally acted like a classless lout.

Bravo! I think you’ve won this debate too…

23

[quote]vroom wrote:

What is there to say about the case? A judge took a stance that generally seems out of line with established convention. It will probably be overturned. [/quote]

Then why post in this thread? If there is nothing to say - why do you have so many posts here?

[quote]Is there something in particular about the case you would like to see discussed? Maybe you should raise this all important issue instead of throwing insults like an impotent little child.
[/quote]

If you would bother to read the discussion - I think it is evident that there were issues discussed. And guess what? You were the only one to come in and start preaching your doom and gloom of the evils of religion.

The impotent one is he who has nothing to say on the topic - but instead hijacks it in an attempt to get on his soapbox.

You are back to the thinking tree again - and it is just stupidity personified. You have yet to impress anyone with your ruminations - except yourself.

24

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Then why post in this thread? If there is nothing to say - why do you have so many posts here?[/quote]

I have multiple posts here because I’m conversing with you…

How fucking obvious is that?

Ahahahahaha. Come on man. Put some effort into this! You ought to be embarrassed. If it wasn’t for you and your misbegotten allegations I’d have a single lonely post sitting up there.

Duh.

Look, I made one rather benign post, then your train flew off the tracks of reality and I defended myself from your retarded accusations. You are still at it too… it’s astounding.

Keep posting man, you are just making yourself look more foolish every time you hit submit.

25

[quote]vroom wrote:
Keep posting man, you are just making yourself look more foolish every time you hit submit.[/quote]

If it’s a contest - I will always be a distant second to you.

26

[quote]rainjack wrote:
If it’s a contest - I will always be a distant second to you. [/quote]

Don’t be too sure… do you think these words might apply to someone who hopped onto his anti-vroom soapbox, hijacked the thread and really had nothing to say?

…is he who has nothing to say on the topic - but instead hijacks it in an attempt to get on his soapbox.

Because, honestly man, I’d have one post right now… and all I’ve done is tried to clarify that one post for rounds and rounds of your bullshit.

Here, since you like to do it so much, let me declare victory for you…

Bravo! You win again!!!

27

So I forced you to continue posting? Are you truly that weak?

28

from someone who doesn’t venture in here too often:

vroom, you might not be anti-religion, but it sure seems like you’re in favor of placing religion in a small, steel, black lockbox, chaining it up, burying it in the backyard and never speaking of it ever again.

29

[quote]tGunslinger wrote:
from someone who doesn’t venture in here too often:

vroom, you might not be anti-religion, but it sure seems like you’re in favor of placing religion in a small, steel, black lockbox, chaining it up, burying it in the backyard and never speaking of it ever again.
[/quote]

Gunslinger, while my view isn’t as restrictive as another poster on here would have you believe, I do think religion is better as a personal or private thing.

In the marketplace of ideas my opinion is just one idea for consideration.