Join the fight against flat chested, muscular women.
Well, I don’t know if I want to fight against them, as I respect and am impressed by the amount of work it takes to look like that.
Plus, I would go to town on that PI girl without hesitation, she’s beautiful.
However, I’m just perplexed at the volume of males on here who don’t seem to care about any sort of cleavage anymore, provided that there’s single-digit bodyfat in place of it.
A man not caring about curves on a woman is like a man who doesn’t like pizza or red meat. It just doesn’t make sense to me, biologically…[/quote]
I love curves. I just place more importance on nice legs and ass than big tits. I also can’t stand the way implants feel, and most of the time they don’t look right.
[quote]xjayx300 wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
xjayx300 wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
xjayx300 wrote:
I don’t mind that she is yoked, but the hairy chest is a turn off…
Why did you ruin her with Tate’s chest??
oh but your ugly mug plastered on her did ‘ruin her’?
IGRAGOO wrote:
COOL!! My face could go to those spots ANYTIME!!!
I didn’t do that, knot-head.
Never said you did, dolt…Just pointing out you didn’t mind your ugly mug plastered over her…Which explains the hair growth on her chest…
[/quote]
Hey, what can I say? My nut is so potent, it’ll put hair on your chest.
I love curves. I just place more importance on nice legs and ass than big tits. I also can’t stand the way implants feel, and most of the time they don’t look right.
[/quote]
Trust me, I’m not talking about implants.
I’m talking about the in-shape, lean (but not ripped to shreds) female that still maintains her curves and nicely sized natural breasts.
If a female can be lean, yet at the same time be a genetic freak and maintain fat in all the right places, then I call that perfection, and that’s what I’ll drool over and go crazy for.
Just my personal preference. And no, slapping a pair of implants on a ripped up chick isn’t the same, although it’s better than no boobs at all.
I love curves. I just place more importance on nice legs and ass than big tits. I also can’t stand the way implants feel, and most of the time they don’t look right.
Trust me, I’m not talking about implants.
I’m talking about the in-shape, lean (but not ripped to shreds) female that still maintains her curves and nicely sized natural breasts.
If a female can be lean, yet at the same time be a genetic freak and maintain fat in all the right places, then I call that perfection, and that’s what I’ll drool over and go crazy for.
Just my personal preference. And no, slapping a pair of implants on a ripped up chick isn’t the same, although it’s better than no boobs at all.[/quote]
I love curves. I just place more importance on nice legs and ass than big tits. I also can’t stand the way implants feel, and most of the time they don’t look right.
Trust me, I’m not talking about implants.
I’m talking about the in-shape, lean (but not ripped to shreds) female that still maintains her curves and nicely sized natural breasts.
If a female can be lean, yet at the same time be a genetic freak and maintain fat in all the right places, then I call that perfection, and that’s what I’ll drool over and go crazy for.
Just my personal preference. And no, slapping a pair of implants on a ripped up chick isn’t the same, although it’s better than no boobs at all.
[quote]Bauer97 wrote:
If a female can be lean, yet at the same time be a genetic freak and maintain fat in all the right places, then I call that perfection, and that’s what I’ll drool over and go crazy for.
[/quote]
Now THAT, be the Holy Grail ye’re speakin’ of. Don’t get me wrong. I looooove me some titties. If I had to choose, though, it’s be the lower half.
And I would also take the bolt-ons over a totally flat expanse. There’s at least got to be a mouthful(and REALLY full).
[quote]Kratos wrote:
Bauer97 wrote:
If a female can be lean, yet at the same time be a genetic freak and maintain fat in all the right places, then I call that perfection, and that’s what I’ll drool over and go crazy for.
Now THAT, be the Holy Grail ye’re speakin’ of. Don’t get me wrong. I looooove me some titties. If I had to choose, though, it’s be the lower half.
And I would also take the bolt-ons over a totally flat expanse. There’s at least got to be a mouthful(and REALLY full).[/quote]
On my google search, there weren’t enough pics. Kept pulling up another female fitness player, but it was definitely a nice topless shot of a lean woman with a natural chest. http://images.google.com/images?q=bankuti+gabriella&hl=en
Plus, I would go to town on that PI girl without hesitation, she’s beautiful.
…
It’s looking at the whole package. If she wasn’t so well developed and fit, then you could complain about not having a big chest. She, however, looks great even with a small chest.
Oh, and for the record I like boobs, but not big floppy bags, or fake ones that are so big they look like basketballs. Rmember, big is not always better. [/quote]
QFT
The key word here being, “boobs”.
Not, “bags of silicone”.
[quote]legend wrote:
guys she is in contest shape in that pic…so for 45ish weeks of the year she will be considerably curvier.
Some fellas are never pleased, you seriously wouldn’t worry about small boobs when she had those perfect legs wrapped around the back of your head [/quote]
[quote]legend wrote:
guys she is in contest shape in that pic…so for 45ish weeks of the year she will be considerably curvier.
Some fellas are never pleased, you seriously wouldn’t worry about small boobs when she had those perfect legs wrapped around the back of your head [/quote]
That’s not the debate though.
The debate is that a huge majority of guys on this site would PREFER (unrealistically obviously) that her body looks like contest shape, year-round.
That’s what I, and a select few others, don’t understand. Why you would constantly want a competely shredded female, who suffers the boob-less consequences of being that shredded.
But, as has been said 93 times in this thread, to each his own.