Deezweez!
[quote]ninjaboy wrote:
I gave him a 6. He’s got an okay base of muscle, fairly even development, and looks like he’s heading in the right direction overall. He would look better with a slightly lower bodyfat, but as a powerlifter that’s probably a secondary goal. Also, I bet he has candy in his van.[/quote]
lmao! … i almost spit my eggs out!!! i second most tho, good base muscle, more than a lot of rate my phys. posts, but not really what this site is going for in terms of presentation i guess
Nice pics bro…shave though, no homo.
I have a sinking feeling this guy is well known around here. Thats why they’re ribbing him.
[quote]G87 wrote:
Dustin wrote:
maxbm wrote:
^ That’s because my traps are huge, bro.
BTW, I never understood why everyone thinks I look “creepy” or like a pedophile.
Seriously?
Well, let’s see, you have excessive amounts of body hair, combined with pasty white skin and a smile that, possibly, only a mother could love. And, to top it all off, you are wearing a speedo.
I rated you a “5”. You have a good foundation and have made significant increases in size and strength.
As others have stated, a decent tan, a razor, and some poses that actually show your muscles would go a long way to improve your rating.
Dustin
“Excessive body hair”? On a MALE? Oops, sorry, I thought I was checking out a site called “Testosterone Nation,” not “Cosmopolitan Online.”
Now, the smile I can agree on… Though, I don’t see why people like you are being total dicks/insulting about it.
With the added shots, I’d say a 5.5 is in order. [/quote]
http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=645282&pageNo=0
Let the hilarity ensue.
I’ll add though, he’s changed since then.
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
I’m pretty sure that’s diesel weasel. He’s a legend in the same vein as eliteballa 3 'round these parts. Look it up, you won’t regret it.[/quote]
Yea - I was about to point that out.
[quote]HotCarl28 wrote:
here’s the thing that is weak… there is a sticky complaining about all of the people who dont include good shots of their whole bodies, and dont look like they lift at all etc…
this guy includes two very clear whole body shots and no one has anything constructive to say… and he gets a rating of 2.5?
amazing… just cuz the dude looks like a creepy pedophile ppl shit all over him[/quote]
Actually, read the thread that rsg linked and you’ll see why everyone thinks this guy is a giant douchebag.
This thread delivers!
[quote]tribunaldude wrote:
I have a sinking feeling this guy is well known around here. Thats why they’re ribbing him.
[/quote]
Yeah, I know, I looked him up after someone mentioned it on the first page 
Still, everyone deserves a chance, and it’s been a couple of years since his last post, as far as I know.
Oh dear Lord…The Deez is back.
God help us all.
You better recognize.
[quote]G87 wrote:
“Excessive body hair”? On a MALE? Oops, sorry, I thought I was checking out a site called “Testosterone Nation,” not “Cosmopolitan Online.”
[/quote]
Yeah, sorry about that. I didn’t know the “gorilla/pedophile” look was “in” this summer.
Dustin
The “testosterone” apparently only refers to the anabolic steroids of the pro bodybuilders which the internet fanboys on this board drool over, not actual masculinity and being manly.
And how would you define that, Max?
In no particular order: body hair, facial hair, muscle, physical strength, emotional strength, military service, being responsible for a wife/kids (if applicable), heavy metal music, firearms, martial arts, steak, beef jerky, denim, leather, and having the courage to speak about false-flag operations perpetrated by the U.S. government, such as 9/11.
[quote]maxbm wrote:
false-flag operations perpetrated by the U.S. government, such as 9/11.[/quote]
I’m reeeeeeeeeally waiting for you to explain this one. Seriously, I’ll stay online to hear your explanation.
A controlled demolition via a combination of thermate cutter charges and C4 derivatives was used to destroy the structural integrity of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.
Tower 7 was not even hit by any airplanes and it still came down symmetrically and at near free-fall speeds, like WTC 1 and 2.
No high-rise skyscraper ever came down from fires, not even raging infernos that lasted for many hours, in the history of our planet… until 9/11/01.
The WTC architects designed the towers to withstand not one, but TWO commercial airlines of similar size to the ones that collided with the towers on September 11th.
There were huge pools of molten iron underneath the rubble of WTC for months after 9/11.
Jet fuel is a hydrocarbon which does NOT burn hot enough to melt steel, like the columns that were in the towers.
Many of the hijackers who were involved in the 9/11 attacks were horrible pilots, according to their flight school instructors.
NORAD was running numerous wargame operations and other training exercises during the morning of 9/11, a few of which were similar to the hijacking scenario that took place that morning.
I can proceed with links to relevant documents in the mainstream media and other sources of info, but it’s late as shit and I have work tomorrow.
Jesus fucking christ. God help us all. Here we go!
[quote]maxbm wrote:
A controlled demolition via a combination of thermate cutter charges and C4 derivatives was used to destroy the structural integrity of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.
Tower 7 was not even hit by any airplanes and it still came down symmetrically and at near free-fall speeds, like WTC 1 and 2.
No high-rise skyscraper ever came down from fires, not even raging infernos that lasted for many hours, in the history of our planet… until 9/11/01.
The WTC architects designed the towers to withstand not one, but TWO commercial airlines of similar size to the ones that collided with the towers on September 11th.
There were huge pools of molten iron underneath the rubble of WTC for months after 9/11.
Jet fuel is a hydrocarbon which does NOT burn hot enough to melt steel, like the columns that were in the towers.
Many of the hijackers who were involved in the 9/11 attacks were horrible pilots, according to their flight school instructors.
NORAD was running numerous wargame operations and other training exercises during the morning of 9/11, a few of which were similar to the hijacking scenario that took place that morning.
I can proceed with links to relevant documents in the mainstream media and other sources of info, but it’s late as shit and I have work tomorrow.[/quote]
Why are you fagging up your own thread with an irrelevant topic?
Dustin
The thread sucked because of you, so I had nothing to lose.