[quote]Mike Sullivan wrote:
UtahLama wrote:
Mike Sullivan wrote:
947 penis curls with and 88 pound kettelbell.
I don’t know how this converts, but I did 471 penis curls with a 92 pound kettlebell.
You need to take into account the length of the penis to do an accurate conversion of the actual work done.
Work done = final kinetic energy - starting kinetic energy
so …
work = force x distance
Utahlama work = (4.45 Newtons/pound) x 92 pounds x 471 reps x 1 = 192827.4 Joules
Utah has a 12 inch long Johnson=1 ft
Sully has a 8 incher= 0.67ft
Sully work = 4.45 x 947 x 88 x .67ft = 248466.3 Joules
As you can see I did considerably more total work.
I did my reps EDT style in a 20 minute pr zone.
Lama did his as one continuous HIT session in 10 minutes
and since power = work / time
Lama power = 192827.4 Joules / (10min x 60sec/min) = 321.379 W
Sully power = 248466.3 Joules / 1200 = 207.55 Watts
While I generated more total energy Utahlama’s was more intenses
[/quote]
While I congratulate you on your calculations, I believe I have spotted an error in your logic. You claim to have moved the weight a farther distance, when I think UtahLama actually moved it farther. Observe:
UtahLama’s penis is 12 inches while yours is only 8 inches (which shouldn’t be teased). The tip of a 12" penis will travel farther from start to finish than an 8" penis because it creates a wider arc. Unless, of course the weight is not balanced on the end, but at a point closer in.
So, the true measure of distance moved is how many inches away from the base of the penis the weight is placed, not the overall length of penis.
DB