I had assumed the potency was determined moreso by how long it takes to have an effect… Are there any known ratios or anything that can relate dosage to effect comparative from Test C to Test P?
Like if Test P is 50% more potent than Test C, reducing her dosage from 15mg to 10mg would effectively have no change; if it’s like 2-3x more potent, this is much more concerning. I’m probably asking for moon rocks here.
@Andrewgen_Receptors This 
Good catch, edited.
Thank you.
Not really. Keep in mind there are not many, maybe a couple dozen. Almost all are twice weekly. A handful do every other day. A handful tried daily, but did not stay with it, as they didn’t notice a difference. I’m positive none are daily at present. They go back to twice and maybe move to cypionate. Guys that try more frequent dosing are almost always forum surfers. I’m still waiting for a guy to want to try twice daily. It will happen.
These snips all say to monitor for supraphysiological Testosterone levels, but don’t explain what that entails. Are they speaking to Free Test? Total Test? Bioavailable?
We know it isn’t quite linear, but absolute dosage response is rather difficult to model - so I’m going to use linear for the sake of argument… If test dosage was linear with serum TT result, she could not touch 3mg/wk without being supra TT.
At 10mg/wk (her first few weeks of protocol), she felt little symptom result - which is why she opted for more. It doesn’t really make sense to monitor TT for many reasons, as discussed in a multitude of other threads; we apply this logic to treating men, why would we not also apply this logic to treating women?
This was fair. I read it, went back to re-read it when I posed the Test Level question to myself, then missed it while looking for the 2 capital T’s… I should have been more thorough.
For the record, we have both requested that future bloodwork be run utilizing the Equilibrium Dialysis method for fT.