[quote]TORO wrote:
Apologies, but you are all way off mark.
We are organic robots, deposited on this planet 20 minutes ago,
with our memories implanted just before that.[/quote]
So the belief in sabertooth pandas is like a glitch then?
Tell THEM to fix it, I find it annoying. [/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in kg) has the same magnitude as the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (x=0) of a ring with a uniformly distributed charge (and whose radius is the same as that of a sphere whose volume is 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
I am pissed that I got stuck with remembering years of sitting in a library studying physics instead of having a series of hot, wild girlfriends. Who do I see about memory exchanges?[/quote]
Sorry, I might have missed your response.
Should I assume you squat at least 405 lbs?[/quote]
LOL[/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in Kg) has the same magnitude as that of the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (X=0) of a ring of charge with a uniform charge distribution (whose radius is the same as that of a sphere with a volume of 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
[quote]TORO wrote:
Apologies, but you are all way off mark.
We are organic robots, deposited on this planet 20 minutes ago,
with our memories implanted just before that.[/quote]
So the belief in sabertooth pandas is like a glitch then?
Tell THEM to fix it, I find it annoying. [/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in kg) has the same magnitude as the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (x=0) of a ring with a uniformly distributed charge (and whose radius is the same as that of a sphere whose volume is 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
I am pissed that I got stuck with remembering years of sitting in a library studying physics instead of having a series of hot, wild girlfriends. Who do I see about memory exchanges?[/quote]
Sorry, I might have missed your response.
Should I assume you squat at least 405 lbs?[/quote]
LOL[/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in Kg) has the same magnitude as that of the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (X=0) of a ring of charge with a uniform charge distribution (whose radius is the same as that of a sphere with a volume of 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
[/quote]
I love ya, Doc.
[quote]TORO wrote:
Apologies, but you are all way off mark.
We are organic robots, deposited on this planet 20 minutes ago,
with our memories implanted just before that.[/quote]
So the belief in sabertooth pandas is like a glitch then?
Tell THEM to fix it, I find it annoying. [/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in kg) has the same magnitude as the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (x=0) of a ring with a uniformly distributed charge (and whose radius is the same as that of a sphere whose volume is 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
I am pissed that I got stuck with remembering years of sitting in a library studying physics instead of having a series of hot, wild girlfriends. Who do I see about memory exchanges?[/quote]
Sorry, I might have missed your response.
Should I assume you squat at least 405 lbs?[/quote]
LOL[/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in Kg) has the same magnitude as that of the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (X=0) of a ring of charge with a uniform charge distribution (whose radius is the same as that of a sphere with a volume of 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
[/quote]
0_0
I usually only use MattyXL’s dog meme for MattyXL stuff but you’ve earned.
[quote]TORO wrote:
Apologies, but you are all way off mark.
We are organic robots, deposited on this planet 20 minutes ago,
with our memories implanted just before that.[/quote]
So the belief in sabertooth pandas is like a glitch then?
Tell THEM to fix it, I find it annoying. [/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in kg) has the same magnitude as the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (x=0) of a ring with a uniformly distributed charge (and whose radius is the same as that of a sphere whose volume is 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
I am pissed that I got stuck with remembering years of sitting in a library studying physics instead of having a series of hot, wild girlfriends. Who do I see about memory exchanges?[/quote]
Sorry, I might have missed your response.
Should I assume you squat at least 405 lbs?[/quote]
LOL[/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in Kg) has the same magnitude as that of the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (X=0) of a ring of charge with a uniform charge distribution (whose radius is the same as that of a sphere with a volume of 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
[/quote]
Believe it or not you’re probably not the only person on this forum to have taken an E&M course.
I’m sure you realize we’ll need a video to ascertain the veracity of your claim. I assume this won’t be an issue?
[quote]Gettnitdone wrote:
So maybe we could ask what you believe?[/quote]
I guess you can ask. What do you want to know specifically?
I’m a really bad Catholic who has a fucking awesome fossil collection?[/quote]
How old do you believe the earth is?
And do you agree with the age estimation of the forest they discovered in China?[/quote]
Before I answer those, what do you hope to glean from my answers? What difference does it make what I believe, or what I think I know, or what do I accept?
I taught a class called “Historical Geology” in grad school. The class is generally the 2nd or 3rd class in a physical/natural/earth sciences curriculum. Call it Geology 102 or 103. It deals largely teaching the principals of earth history, like stratigraphy, fossil evolution, basic structures, etc.
I had one student, a woman in her 40’s who was the wife of preacher at the local Southern Baptist Church. She had to take the class as a requirement to graduate. She knew what the curriculum was. She told me she would do the work and give me the answers that I wanted but she didn’t believe a word of the “evolution stuff”. Fine.
We were out in the field at an outcrop during a lab looking at a basic geologic structure where some ‘action’ took place. The students were to make observations and based on what they had learned, reconstruct the series of events that took place at this formation, and report on it — ie. what happened here?
I said “God did it is a perfectly reasonable answer, but I need to know HOW He did it.”
Guess who the best student in the class was? It wasn’t the computer science kid. Hell, it wasn’t any of the Geology majors. It wasn’t the Iraqi petroleum engineering student who tried to give me a few hundred bucks to pass him…
This thread never intended to be a discussion about the exclusiveness of science and religion and it really hasn’t gone that route except to the extent science conflicts with a rigid literal translation of the Bible and other religious texts. S[/quote]
No, but the first responses from the High Priest and Priestesses of Bash Religion Every Chance They Get certainly thrust it in that direction.
I bet without Googling they really fail to understand just how they came to be via evolution hinges on the time period that this forest was alive.
In other words, they’ll defend “The Theory of Evolution” to death as Gospel (ironically) without understanding even some basic tenets of the real shortcomings of it or even being able to trace back key nodes in the tree other than “we evolved from primates”.
The problem comes down to this: one side has to spend countless amounts of time and energy to test hypothesis and in the process constantly expand our knowledge base while the other side has their answers all laid out in the Holy Book and where factions of that community try to disprove anything that doesn’t ‘fit.’
[quote]TORO wrote:
Apologies, but you are all way off mark.
We are organic robots, deposited on this planet 20 minutes ago,
with our memories implanted just before that.[/quote]
So the belief in sabertooth pandas is like a glitch then?
Tell THEM to fix it, I find it annoying. [/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in kg) has the same magnitude as the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (x=0) of a ring with a uniformly distributed charge (and whose radius is the same as that of a sphere whose volume is 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
I am pissed that I got stuck with remembering years of sitting in a library studying physics instead of having a series of hot, wild girlfriends. Who do I see about memory exchanges?[/quote]
Sorry, I might have missed your response.
Should I assume you squat at least 405 lbs?[/quote]
LOL[/quote]
The amount that I can squat (in Kg) has the same magnitude as that of the position (in meters) along a positive X axis that passes through the center (X=0) of a ring of charge with a uniform charge distribution (whose radius is the same as that of a sphere with a volume of 4.57*10^7 cubic meters) where the electric field produced by the ring of charge is at a maximum.
[/quote]
I love ya, Doc.[/quote]
I was seriously thinking the same thing. Can we adopt him? Like, instead of a cheetah?
Too bad the planet is actually only 6,000 years old.[/quote]
If this find were found to be only 6000 y.o., would it be any less impressive? What are the real scientific implications of this find? Age of the rock is the least interesting thing about it.
