No, you can’t because production couldn’t keep up and neither could the resources,
Total ignorance of how economics on the federal level works.
Ah. So now you understand how stupid is everything you’ve been saying. Very good.
You didn’t answer my question. You just started with an absurd and untrue premise about life in North Korea and then segued into another one of your rants against America. Do you really believe that Americans are subjected to more propaganda than North Koreans? A simple yes or no will do.
1 Like
You’ll have to excuse @castoli711, he’s just admitted that everyone else on the board has been correct and that he’s sounded like a fool all this time.
Ahhh no, that is your lack of understanding D-bag!
Yes.
Zep, you off your meds? Guess the currency trading isn’t going so well.
1 Like
And when haven’t I been saying that resources and production are the reasons for inflation, not printing money. Like everyone else on here claims. Just a bunch of knuckle-draggers living in the economic stone ages. Go back to your favorite conservative economist Uncle Milty. As if his economic theories haven’t been debunked.
As usual you can’t address the current topic. So you deflect. A common tactic here.
You fully admitted above that if you printed too much money, production and resources couldn’t keep up.
See. That means printing shit tons of money CAUSES inflation.
2 Likes
And you are sure that the inflation problems in the U.S. are because of printing money and not because of the pandemic and breakdown of supply-chains. And even those wholesome corporations raising prices, using inflation as an excuse? Just like the hyperinflation in Zimbabwe.
1 Like
And you said millions and billions. A hypothetical. A fantasy. Can you deal in reality? No, because your example comes crashing down and so does your ridiculous argument. Were people given millions and billions a piece?
Dude, its all just zeros on the left side of the decimal point.
Happens all the time w/o causing problems. All federal programs are run this way. FEMA, SS etc. Taxes pay for nothing on the federal level. The dollar is basically a tax credit. However, corporate politicians can’t let you know this. They need you to hold onto the notion that the federal government needs revenue, so they can have power over you.
The recent “infrastructure bill” costed 1.2 Trillion dollars. Are you saying that this didn’t happen?
What about the BBB plan? That was a couple trillion as well, but i understand if you think that one was a ‘win’… nothing makes you happier than taking out loans to pay off loans.
I guess that depends upon how you define “problems.” If your definition is something like, “a complete elimination of life on earth,” I agree.
Was this given to the people?
[quote=“Andrewgen_Receptors, post:599, topic:277259”]
than taking out loans to pay off loans
j[/quote]
Just highlighting your own ignorance here,
And you were probably silent on the trillions spent on the wars in the mid-east OR the bailout of banks.
Are you trying to say that spending on federal programs is ending life on Earth?
As always, the possibility that you’re as dumb as you seem yet are able to post on this board confounds me.
1 Like