Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
Seattle got thumped on both the O-line and D-line. Seattle had chances to win the game, but it was a bad loss for them. My assessment is Dallas is legit.
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Seattle got thumped on both the O-line and D-line. Seattle had chances to win the game, but it was a bad loss for them. My assessment is Dallas is legit. [/quote]
Ya, after watching some of the Eagles Giants game and the end of the Redskins game I’d say they win the division.
Dallas doesn’t have a very tough schedule.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
[/quote]
if it wasn’t for the special team plays by SEA, the 'Boys really did dominate the game. I really hate to say it but they are looking like a complete team this year, in lieu of their defensive injuries. Give credit to Marinelli, I guess.
[quote]PB Andy wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
[/quote]
if it wasn’t for the special team plays by SEA, the 'Boys really did dominate the game. I really hate to say it but they are looking like a complete team this year, in lieu of their defensive injuries. Give credit to Marinelli, I guess.
[/quote]
“Dominate” is a pretty strong word for a 7 point win. Special teams is a facet of the game is it not?
If it wasn’t for the Raven’s special teams play they wouldn’t of won Super Bow XLVII.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]PB Andy wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
[/quote]
if it wasn’t for the special team plays by SEA, the 'Boys really did dominate the game. I really hate to say it but they are looking like a complete team this year, in lieu of their defensive injuries. Give credit to Marinelli, I guess.
[/quote]
“Dominate” is a pretty strong word for a 7 point win. Special teams is a facet of the game is it not? [/quote]
It was a close game that came down to a couple plays like a lot of NFL games do. I would say that Dallas beat Seattle badly on the O and D line most of the game and I felt a little sick as a Seattle fan about that aspect of the game. Dallas played a very solid game and Seattle didn’t.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]PB Andy wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
[/quote]
if it wasn’t for the special team plays by SEA, the 'Boys really did dominate the game. I really hate to say it but they are looking like a complete team this year, in lieu of their defensive injuries. Give credit to Marinelli, I guess.
[/quote]
“Dominate” is a pretty strong word for a 7 point win. Special teams is a facet of the game is it not? [/quote]
Well if you go by the spread and that most everybody thought Seattle would win. They were what, 8.5 point favorites or something like that? That’s basically like a 15 point swing. Sometimes looking at a final score does not really indicate how the game actually was.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]PB Andy wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
[/quote]
if it wasn’t for the special team plays by SEA, the 'Boys really did dominate the game. I really hate to say it but they are looking like a complete team this year, in lieu of their defensive injuries. Give credit to Marinelli, I guess.
[/quote]
“Dominate” is a pretty strong word for a 7 point win. Special teams is a facet of the game is it not? [/quote]
Well if you go by the spread and that most everybody thought Seattle would win. They were what, 8.5 point favorites or something like that? That’s basically like a 15 point swing. Sometimes looking at a final score does not really indicate how the game actually was. [/quote]
The Cowboys won an impressive game.
The Cowboys were losing in the 4th quarter.
Murray ran for an average of 3.9 yards per carry (less than his average on the year).
Romo threw for 250 yards (his 3rd fewest of the season). 2 TDs is about average for him this year.
Seattle didn’t play well. Dallas did. They should be proud of how they’ve played. I think they’ll win the division if they continue on this trend.
Like I said “dominate” is a strong word when they were losing in the 4th quarter.
I agree “dominated” is not the word I would use, but there was no doubt Dallas is a legit team right now.
They better get that Dunbar guy mixed in, Murray isn’t going to hold up to the 400 something carries he is on pace for.
I too would not say dominate as much as I would say a complete game was played by Dallas.
I wish the Dallas-Seattle game was broadcast here. It would have made for some entertaining football as opposed to watching my Skins implode. Again.
[quote]print wrote:
I too would not say dominate as much as I would say a complete game was played by Dallas.[/quote]
Print, you sexy son of a bitch. You ready for your Jets to catch the Pats in a trap game on Thursday?
Mayo is out… That D just really got a lot worse.
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
I wish the Dallas-Seattle game was broadcast here. It would have made for some entertaining football as opposed to watching my Skins implode. Again.[/quote]
Cousin’s has looked terrible lately.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
I too would not say dominate as much as I would say a complete game was played by Dallas.[/quote]
Print, you sexy son of a bitch. You ready for your Jets to catch the Pats in a trap game on Thursday?
Mayo is out… That D just really got a lot worse. [/quote]
It’s getting harder & harder for me each week. Yesterday was as close as I think we’ll get. Though, you know how it goes when the 2 of us play. It’s either a Patz blow-out of the Jets or a squeaker of a win for us. Usually won by a Patz mistake. I’d like a win… any kinda win will do.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
I wish the Dallas-Seattle game was broadcast here. It would have made for some entertaining football as opposed to watching my Skins implode. Again.[/quote]
Cousin’s has looked terrible lately. [/quote]
Read this morning, McCoy might get the start this weekend.
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
I wish the Dallas-Seattle game was broadcast here. It would have made for some entertaining football as opposed to watching my Skins implode. Again.[/quote]
Cousin’s has looked terrible lately. [/quote]
Read this morning, McCoy might get the start this weekend.[/quote]
Ya I can understand. It’s a shame I thought Kirk was gonna be pretty good.
Too many turnovers though.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]PB Andy wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Lol mbdix, you are hilarious. Murray averaged 3.9 yards a carry. They ran the ball 29 times.
They were losing in the 4th quarter…
[/quote]
if it wasn’t for the special team plays by SEA, the 'Boys really did dominate the game. I really hate to say it but they are looking like a complete team this year, in lieu of their defensive injuries. Give credit to Marinelli, I guess.
[/quote]
“Dominate” is a pretty strong word for a 7 point win. Special teams is a facet of the game is it not? [/quote]
true, dominate is probably not the right word in general, but I was more talking in the trenches. O-line, D-line dominance, IMO.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
I wish the Dallas-Seattle game was broadcast here. It would have made for some entertaining football as opposed to watching my Skins implode. Again.[/quote]
Cousin’s has looked terrible lately. [/quote]
Read this morning, McCoy might get the start this weekend.[/quote]
Ya I can understand. It’s a shame I thought Kirk was gonna be pretty good.
Too many turnovers though. [/quote]
True but honestly I blame that on play calling right now. My fear with bringing in Gruden was we were going to turn into a pass happy team. There is too much on Cousins shoulders and not enough done on the ground. Morris wasn’t getting huge chunks of yardage or anything but I think I saw there were only 3 rushing plays after the half? That’s just silly.
I think Kirk can still be pretty good. This is a kid that’s only in his 3rd year. He’s not as great as Luck right out of the gate but look at the Bradys and Rogers etc that have come after years of bench riding and learning.
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
I wish the Dallas-Seattle game was broadcast here. It would have made for some entertaining football as opposed to watching my Skins implode. Again.[/quote]
Cousin’s has looked terrible lately. [/quote]
Read this morning, McCoy might get the start this weekend.[/quote]
Ya I can understand. It’s a shame I thought Kirk was gonna be pretty good.
Too many turnovers though. [/quote]
True but honestly I blame that on play calling right now. My fear with bringing in Gruden was we were going to turn into a pass happy team. There is too much on Cousins shoulders and not enough done on the ground. Morris wasn’t getting huge chunks of yardage or anything but I think I saw there were only 3 rushing plays after the half? That’s just silly.
I think Kirk can still be pretty good. This is a kid that’s only in his 3rd year. He’s not as great as Luck right out of the gate but look at the Bradys and Rogers etc that have come after years of bench riding and learning.[/quote]
Ya, I’m not writing him off yet.