2006-2007 Fantasy Football Thread

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 2:00pm

Haha, you know I could not resist. Shit, CulPepper has one more chance for me before I bench his ass. If he cant put up numbers against TN lst week, it is not going to happen.

What do you think of my new backfield? LT and LJ baby…haha, criminal…I know.

[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Its time to cut your losses when it comes to Moss, its has become pathetic bro, haha.

If, if, if… its not gonna happen, he is done.

A

Go heavy fool wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
dre wrote:

The Raiders can’t be this ball all season can they?

Hah. With Aaron Brooks at QB…yea, they can.

He’s out. Randy has a chance now with the young slinger back there this week. They arn’t facing the Ravens anymore.

Although that o-Line in the worst, not gonna make a difference whose slingin’. Manning would have it rough on that team.

Put Randy Moss with Roethlisberger’s comp % and Pittsburgh’s best O’Line in the NFL… were talking #2 Wr behind Maybe Larry Fitz, CJ or Harrison.

Fuck You AA! You know you’re right and my Moss statement is only getting embarrasing at this point. Goddam bastard. Don’t rub it in. I know I’m fucked with Moss. I know you’re right. But, I drafted that hopeless mother fucker and I have to justify that pic some how.

I’m waiting for Randy to put up just one 100 yard game with a TD{like that’s ever going to happen} then I will “try” to trade his useless ass… key word there “if” he may not score at all on that team. although LJ hasnt scored either. So I waiting patiently.
[/quote]

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 2:02pm

The fucking Skins better do something next week. I got tickets to the Jax game in week 4. Game is at 4, tailgating will start promptly at noon. Port should help them a lot but they have got other issues. Going into that Jax game 1-2 presents another must win for them I would say.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
By the way, Portis is coming back vs. Houston this week, the weakest D in the league.

This weeks starting backs are James, Portis, and Gore.

It’ll be a good week.[/quote]

dre · September 20, 2006, 2:04pm

Alright, i’ve got the bye week blues this week. LT and Gates are obviously both on byes this week. No big deal about the TE but who do I start at RB for LT? This is what I have as option.

On my bench, Travis Henry, Brandon Jacobs, and DeShaun Foster. If the trade doesn’t go through involving Foster i’m thinking I need to start him.

Otherwise these are the top backs available on the waiver wire. Mike Bell, Jerious Norwood, Musa Smith.

What do you guys think?

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 2:20pm

Start Foster. I am actually starting DeAngelo Williams this week since both LT and LJ are on a bye. I am hoping for a goal line TD. I think Foster will still get the bulk of work but the rook should be good for a few pts at least.

My other option is to start Droughns against Baltimore…yeah no need to tell you why he is on my bench.

[quote]dre wrote:
Alright, i’ve got the bye week blues this week. LT and Gates are obviously both on byes this week. No big deal about the TE but who do I start at RB for LT? This is what I have as option.

On my bench, Travis Henry, Brandon Jacobs, and DeShaun Foster. If the trade doesn’t go through involving Foster i’m thinking I need to start him.

Otherwise these are the top backs available on the waiver wire. Mike Bell, Jerious Norwood, Musa Smith.

What do you guys think?[/quote]

Built_Big · September 20, 2006, 3:22pm

How long do you guys usually hold on to someone that’s not producing before you get rid of them? Lamont Jordan hasn’t done a thing and I’m glad I benched him this past week against the Ravens. I started Chester Taylor in his place. The Raiders have their bye this week and I’m not in a hurry to dump Jordan or anything, I’m just curious to know at what point do you finally make a move? Any general rules or guidelines that anyone follows would be appreciated.

dre · September 20, 2006, 3:41pm

[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Start Foster. I am actually starting DeAngelo Williams this week since both LT and LJ are on a bye. I am hoping for a goal line TD. I think Foster will still get the bulk of work but the rook should be good for a few pts at least.

My other option is to start Droughns against Baltimore…yeah no need to tell you why he is on my bench.

dre wrote:
Alright, i’ve got the bye week blues this week. LT and Gates are obviously both on byes this week. No big deal about the TE but who do I start at RB for LT? This is what I have as option.

On my bench, Travis Henry, Brandon Jacobs, and DeShaun Foster. If the trade doesn’t go through involving Foster i’m thinking I need to start him.

Otherwise these are the top backs available on the waiver wire. Mike Bell, Jerious Norwood, Musa Smith.

What do you guys think?

[/quote]

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing.

And when are the fukin’ Skins going to put some points on the board. Shit, i’m regretting picking up S. Moss. How long can they stick with Brunell? He looks like a freakin’ deer in headlights most of the time. I know that Campbell isn’t much better but shiat. Give the kid a chance.

dre · September 20, 2006, 3:44pm

[quote]Built Big wrote:
How long do you guys usually hold on to someone that’s not producing before you get rid of them? Lamont Jordan hasn’t done a thing and I’m glad I benched him this past week against the Ravens. I started Chester Taylor in his place. The Raiders have their bye this week and I’m not in a hurry to dump Jordan or anything, I’m just curious to know at what point do you finally make a move? Any general rules or guidelines that anyone follows would be appreciated. [/quote]

Well, my opinion is you should wait atleast until week 5 before dumping them. Or you can always try to work a trade. I would hold onto LaMont for the time being though. I think the Raiders are going to get better.

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 3:53pm

Sell high buy low, you cant trade him now because you will not get any value in return. I do not think that situation in Oakland is going to get any better this season. I think the kid Walter will do enough in Brooks’ absence to become the starter for the rest of the year. Lamont gets Cleveland in weeek 4 and San Fran in week 5, he should produce in those weeks. I would try and trade him after week 5 when his value should be at his highest, before he plays Denver in week 6.

A

[quote]dre wrote:
Built Big wrote:
How long do you guys usually hold on to someone that’s not producing before you get rid of them? Lamont Jordan hasn’t done a thing and I’m glad I benched him this past week against the Ravens. I started Chester Taylor in his place. The Raiders have their bye this week and I’m not in a hurry to dump Jordan or anything, I’m just curious to know at what point do you finally make a move? Any general rules or guidelines that anyone follows would be appreciated.

Well, my opinion is you should wait atleast until week 5 before dumping them. Or you can always try to work a trade. I would hold onto LaMont for the time being though. I think the Raiders are going to get better. [/quote]

Go_heavy_fool · September 20, 2006, 4:13pm

[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Haha, you know I could not resist. Shit, CulPepper has one more chance for me before I bench his ass. If he cant put up numbers against TN lst week, it is not going to happen.

What do you think of my new backfield? LT and LJ baby…haha, criminal…I know.

Go heavy fool wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Its time to cut your losses when it comes to Moss, its has become pathetic bro, haha.

If, if, if… its not gonna happen, he is done.

A

Go heavy fool wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
dre wrote:

The Raiders can’t be this ball all season can they?

Hah. With Aaron Brooks at QB…yea, they can.

He’s out. Randy has a chance now with the young slinger back there this week. They arn’t facing the Ravens anymore.

Although that o-Line in the worst, not gonna make a difference whose slingin’. Manning would have it rough on that team.

Put Randy Moss with Roethlisberger’s comp % and Pittsburgh’s best O’Line in the NFL… were talking #2 Wr behind Maybe Larry Fitz, CJ or Harrison.

Fuck You AA! You know you’re right and my Moss statement is only getting embarrasing at this point. Goddam bastard. Don’t rub it in. I know I’m fucked with Moss. I know you’re right. But, I drafted that hopeless mother fucker and I have to justify that pic some how.

I’m waiting for Randy to put up just one 100 yard game with a TD{like that’s ever going to happen} then I will “try” to trade his useless ass… key word there “if” he may not score at all on that team. although LJ hasnt scored either. So I waiting patiently.

[/quote]
I think its disgusting! Every member in your league should be tared and feathered for letting you get away with that.

You can’t lose with that… I don’t even care who the rest of your team is. You could use all free agents + those 2 and win every game.

Jesus fuckin’ christ.

Lord have mercy. Why don’t you get Peyton while you’re at it. Better yet pick up Baltimore’s DEF & Peyton.

Go_heavy_fool · September 20, 2006, 4:15pm

[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Sell high buy low, you cant trade him now because you will not get any value in return. I do not think that situation in Oakland is going to get any better this season. I think the kid Walter will do enough in Brooks’ absence to become the starter for the rest of the year. Lamont gets Cleveland in weeek 4 and San Fran in week 5, he should produce in those weeks. I would try and trade him after week 5 when his value should be at his highest, before he plays Denver in week 6.

A

dre wrote:
Built Big wrote:
How long do you guys usually hold on to someone that’s not producing before you get rid of them? Lamont Jordan hasn’t done a thing and I’m glad I benched him this past week against the Ravens. I started Chester Taylor in his place. The Raiders have their bye this week and I’m not in a hurry to dump Jordan or anything, I’m just curious to know at what point do you finally make a move? Any general rules or guidelines that anyone follows would be appreciated.

Well, my opinion is you should wait atleast until week 5 before dumping them. Or you can always try to work a trade. I would hold onto LaMont for the time being though. I think the Raiders are going to get better.

[/quote]

Looks like I’m stuck with Moss til week 6. Week 5 should be my bait week Vs SF he should put up the #'s.

dre · September 20, 2006, 4:31pm

[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:

Looks like I’m stuck with Moss til week 6. Week 5 should be my bait week Vs SF he should put up the #'s.
[/quote]

Stuck with him? Why just a week ago you were saying that he was going to be a top 5 WR! Bwah hahahaha… Now that’s funny.

You can predict the amount of yards R. Brown will have in week 1. You can predict that Favre will light it up against the Saints in Week 2. Yet, you just couldn’t see that Moss would suck this year? What happened to your crystal ball on that one man!?! haha

Go_heavy_fool · September 20, 2006, 4:46pm

[quote]dre wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote:

Looks like I’m stuck with Moss til week 6. Week 5 should be my bait week Vs SF he should put up the #'s.

Stuck with him? Why just a week ago you were saying that he was going to be a top 5 WR! Bwah hahahaha… Now that’s funny.

You can predict the amount of yards R. Brown will have in week 1. You can predict that Favre will light it up against the Saints in Week 2. Yet, you just couldn’t see that Moss would suck this year? What happened to your crystal ball on that one man!?! haha[/quote]
Again its not Moss! It’s Oakland! I didn’t predict that line getting worse and the QB problem getting worse.

For those of you that think its Randy… I still disagree with that. Christ he’s still Randy, he’s not old, he doesn’t drop balls. He just never gets one that comes his way.

I know Moss is a problem. Let him get traded and we’ll see who knows their WR’s. He is still the best in the league… only Fitz has more talent.

Enough with Randy already! It’s pissing me off more that an elite player is on a shit team like that more than how he’s almost useless on my fantasy team being in Oakland right now.

I really feel for Moss. How much of a paycut would he have to take to end up on a team that has playoff caliber? If I were him I would want career stats. He’s ruining his career probably for money. I am competitive. Rich is rich. 57 Lamborghini’s or 39 Lamborghini’s… christ what’s the difference once you make that much? Get a superbowl ring. and the ball thrown to you 10 times a game. What a waste. Should have went to
Miami with Pepp.

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 4:55pm

[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Haha, you know I could not resist. Shit, CulPepper has one more chance for me before I bench his ass. If he cant put up numbers against TN lst week, it is not going to happen.

What do you think of my new backfield? LT and LJ baby…haha, criminal…I know.

Go heavy fool wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Its time to cut your losses when it comes to Moss, its has become pathetic bro, haha.

If, if, if… its not gonna happen, he is done.

A

Go heavy fool wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
dre wrote:

The Raiders can’t be this ball all season can they?

Hah. With Aaron Brooks at QB…yea, they can.

He’s out. Randy has a chance now with the young slinger back there this week. They arn’t facing the Ravens anymore.

Although that o-Line in the worst, not gonna make a difference whose slingin’. Manning would have it rough on that team.

Put Randy Moss with Roethlisberger’s comp % and Pittsburgh’s best O’Line in the NFL… were talking #2 Wr behind Maybe Larry Fitz, CJ or Harrison.

Fuck You AA! You know you’re right and my Moss statement is only getting embarrasing at this point. Goddam bastard. Don’t rub it in. I know I’m fucked with Moss. I know you’re right. But, I drafted that hopeless mother fucker and I have to justify that pic some how.

I’m waiting for Randy to put up just one 100 yard game with a TD{like that’s ever going to happen} then I will “try” to trade his useless ass… key word there “if” he may not score at all on that team. although LJ hasnt scored either. So I waiting patiently.

I think its disgusting! Every member in your league should be tared and feathered for letting you get away with that.

You can’t lose with that… I don’t even care who the rest of your team is. You could use all free agents + those 2 and win every game.

Jesus fuckin’ christ.

Lord have mercy. Why don’t you get Peyton while you’re at it. Better yet pick up Baltimore’s DEF & Peyton.

[/quote]

dre · September 20, 2006, 4:57pm

[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
dre wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote:

Looks like I’m stuck with Moss til week 6. Week 5 should be my bait week Vs SF he should put up the #'s.

Stuck with him? Why just a week ago you were saying that he was going to be a top 5 WR! Bwah hahahaha… Now that’s funny.

You can predict the amount of yards R. Brown will have in week 1. You can predict that Favre will light it up against the Saints in Week 2. Yet, you just couldn’t see that Moss would suck this year? What happened to your crystal ball on that one man!?! haha
Again its not Moss! It’s Oakland! I didn’t predict that line getting worse and the QB problem getting worse.

For those of you that think its Randy… I still disagree with that. Christ he’s still Randy, he’s not old, he doesn’t drop balls. He just never gets one that comes his way.

I know Moss is a problem. Let him get traded and we’ll see who knows their WR’s. He is still the best in the league… only Fitz has more talent.

Enough with Randy already! It’s pissing me off more that an elite player is on a shit team like that more than how he’s almost useless on my fantasy team being in Oakland right now.

I really feel for Moss. How much of a paycut would he have to take to end up on a team that has playoff caliber? If I were him I would want career stats. He’s ruining his career probably for money. I am competitive. Rich is rich. 57 Lamborghini’s or 39 Lamborghini’s… christ what’s the difference once you make that much? Get a superbowl ring. and the ball thrown to you 10 times a game. What a waste. Should have went to
Miami with Pepp.

[/quote]

Wow buddy, you really do have a soft spot for Moss. It’s kinda cute how defensive you get about him. It’s like a little jealous boyfriend or something. Alright, that may have went a little far. Sorry, just jokin’ with ya, meant no disrespect man!

I do agree with you. It’s not Moss. He’s still the player he was last year and the year before. He hasn’t had a lot of balls thrown to him this year because Brooks has spent most of his time on his back. Their O-line is terrible but they have a bye week this week to get healthy. I really think they’ll come out after the bye week and do better.

And it’s always been about the money for Randy. He doesn’t care about his legacy, he doesn’t care about records, he just wants to get paid. To quote Moss, “straight cash homey!”

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 4:57pm

Haha, I drafted the Chicago D but I am looking to trade for Brady. I need a subpar effort from Brady this week and a great week by Kevin Jones. I can then trade to the Brady owner who also has McNabb.

[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Haha, you know I could not resist. Shit, CulPepper has one more chance for me before I bench his ass. If he cant put up numbers against TN lst week, it is not going to happen.

What do you think of my new backfield? LT and LJ baby…haha, criminal…I know.

Go heavy fool wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Its time to cut your losses when it comes to Moss, its has become pathetic bro, haha.

If, if, if… its not gonna happen, he is done.

A

Go heavy fool wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
dre wrote:

The Raiders can’t be this ball all season can they?

Hah. With Aaron Brooks at QB…yea, they can.

He’s out. Randy has a chance now with the young slinger back there this week. They arn’t facing the Ravens anymore.

Although that o-Line in the worst, not gonna make a difference whose slingin’. Manning would have it rough on that team.

Put Randy Moss with Roethlisberger’s comp % and Pittsburgh’s best O’Line in the NFL… were talking #2 Wr behind Maybe Larry Fitz, CJ or Harrison.

Fuck You AA! You know you’re right and my Moss statement is only getting embarrasing at this point. Goddam bastard. Don’t rub it in. I know I’m fucked with Moss. I know you’re right. But, I drafted that hopeless mother fucker and I have to justify that pic some how.

I’m waiting for Randy to put up just one 100 yard game with a TD{like that’s ever going to happen} then I will “try” to trade his useless ass… key word there “if” he may not score at all on that team. although LJ hasnt scored either. So I waiting patiently.

I think its disgusting! Every member in your league should be tared and feathered for letting you get away with that.

You can’t lose with that… I don’t even care who the rest of your team is. You could use all free agents + those 2 and win every game.

Jesus fuckin’ christ.

Lord have mercy. Why don’t you get Peyton while you’re at it. Better yet pick up Baltimore’s DEF & Peyton.

[/quote]

dre · September 20, 2006, 6:21pm

Alright, in my Yahoo league i’m thinking of making two moves. Not any big earth shattering moves. I’m thinking of dropping David Givens and Travis Henry and picking up Jerious Norwood and Mike Bell. Both have the potential to become starters should Dunn go down or should Mike Bell just win the job. But in doing this it would only leave me one WR on my bench. Not a big deal right?

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 6:26pm

Nah just took advantage of the guy being at the bottom two weeks in a row. See, you play against everyone so you cant ride out a losing streak, its total points overall. I sold it beautifully though, haha.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote:

I think its disgusting! Every member in your league should be tared and feathered for letting you get away with that.

I agree.

Your league must be full of half wits if they let you get that.

Good job though.[/quote]

Amsterdam_Animal · September 20, 2006, 6:30pm

Randy is not Randy anymore, he has def lost a step plus his attitude is bad…hhmmm. ok yeah I guess looking at it like that Randy is still Randy.

[quote]dre wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote:
dre wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote: