[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Yes, let’s ignore reality, because that prevents dealing with race issues.
No, the WW2 Vet didn’t die after all, he went home all warm and cozy.
Are we all comfy now ?
Because if 2 white youths beat an 89 yr old Black WW2 Vet, we would not be hearing about it AT ALL.
[/quote]
Max, it’s on every sinlge media outlet right now. Those ass clowns will be caught and hopefully executed, what more do you want?[/quote]
I want Bam to speak out against it.[/quote]
Why?
You really don’t get that racial profiling is the main reason he spoke out the first time?
He didn’t speak out just because a murder happened.
People die and get killed everyday of every color.
How are you supporting your own with this? You only seem interested in the whites killed by blacks…and not the rest.[/quote]
Then why isn’t he speaking out about this incident about racial profiling ?
The boy tweets that he HATES WHITE PEOPLE, and brags about knocking out 5 woods (which is slang for Peckerwood, for those who don’t know). What could possibly be more racial than that ?
If you are going to take a position on racial profiling, then you must do so EVERY TIME it happens. Otherwise, you are showing race preference, which is what Obama is doing.
I am interested in the issues of Whites killed by Blacks because the front line so-called civil rights leaders aren’t. Do you see Jessie or Al coming out about this ?
If I were to speak out about this as equally loud as Al, Jessie, or the Obama did with Trayvon Martin, I would be called David Duke. THAT is the main problem.
Free speech and Equal Rights are allowed so long as the specfic media narrative is maintained.
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
For those saying it’s about poverty, consider the following:
The US Census declared that in 2010 15.1% of the general population lived in poverty:
9.9% of all non-Hispanic white persons
12.1% of all Asian persons
26.6% of all Hispanic persons (of any race)
27.4% of all black persons.
Which means 22,131,774 whites live in poverty, and 10,666,634 blacks live in poverty. For every 1 black person that lives in poverty, there are 2 whites that live in poverty. Yet despite this huge discrepancy in numbers, blacks are still overwhelmingly involved in all crimes. Far beyond white people.
I didn’t say you, USMCCDS423, but those who mentioned poverty. In any case, it’s obviously not a very strong reason since many more whites live in poverty.
Give me a sec to go over your posts (I skimmed over the thread) and give you appropriate replies.
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness.
[/quote]
Do you think these stats, if accurate, are because of skin color?[/quote]
This is a horribly weak cop out. Try again.[/quote]
Oh so the other 7 posts I directed at you what disappeared?
Edit: How is a question a cop out?[/quote]
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Mr Walkway, you are becoming a real shitbag with all of this racebaiting.
[/quote]
How is this racebaiting if it’s a commonly reoccuring event?[/quote]
Because it isn’t. [/quote]
I’m not following, how does prison data correlate to the supposed recurrace of black on white murder? [/quote]
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Mr Walkway, you are becoming a real shitbag with all of this racebaiting.
[/quote]
How is this racebaiting if it’s a commonly reoccuring event?[/quote]
Because it isn’t. [/quote]
From your own link:
Homicide
According to the United States Department of Justice, whites accounted for 45.3% of all homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, blacks accounted for 52.5%, with 2.2% Native Americans and Asians. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most murders were intraracial, with 84% of white homicide victims murdered by whites, and 93% of black victims murdered by blacks.
[/quote]
Also,
In a 2004 United States Department of Justice report which analyzed carjacking trends over the previous decade, carjacking victims identified 56% of the offenders as black, 21% as white, and 16% as members of other races.
According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, in the year 2008 black youths, who make up 16% of the youth population, accounted for 52% of juvenile violent crime arrests, including 58.5% of youth arrests for homicide and 67% for robbery. Black youths were overrepresented in all offense categories except DUI, liquor laws and drunkenness.
Number of whites (2010): 223,553,265, or 72.4% of the population.
Number of blacks (2010): 38,929,319 or 12.6% of the population.
We’re excluding the fact that males commit the most crimes. That means that an ethnic group which accounts for 6.5% of the population commits over half of all the crimes.
[/quote]
What does carjacking have to do with interracial murder?
How many violent acts are committed by youths? or rather what % of violent crime is committed by youths?
The thread is about 2 black kids killing a WII vet.
You wrote:
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
How is this racebaiting if it’s a commonly reoccuring event?[/quote]
How do these other stats support your post?
Again, from your own link:
Homicide
According to the United States Department of Justice, whites accounted for 45.3% of all homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, blacks accounted for 52.5%, with 2.2% Native Americans and Asians. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most murders were intraracial, with 84% of white homicide victims murdered by whites, and 93% of black victims murdered by blacks.
[/quote]
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Blaming skin color for murder is no different than blaming guns for murder, imo. Skin pigmentation doesn’t kill, INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE KILL [/quote]
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
I didn’t say you, USMCCDS423, but those who mentioned poverty. In any case, it’s obviously not a very strong reason since many more whites live in poverty.
Give me a sec to go over your posts (I skimmed over the thread) and give you appropriate replies.[/quote]
I added them to another posts for you.
I was the one that brought up poverty so I thought you mean’t me.
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
Are you saying whites are not or never profiled against by the police?
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
Are you saying whites are not profiled against by the police? [/quote]
I am saying whites are not racially profiled on anywhere near the same level that blacks are or other minorities.
It would be ridiculous to say that whites are NEVER profiled for a crime.
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
Are you saying whites are not profiled against by the police? [/quote]
I am saying whites are not racially profiled on anywhere near the same level that blacks are or other minorities.
It would be ridiculous to say that whites are NEVER profiled for a crime.[/quote]
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
For those saying it’s about poverty, consider the following:
The US Census declared that in 2010 15.1% of the general population lived in poverty:
9.9% of all non-Hispanic white persons
12.1% of all Asian persons
26.6% of all Hispanic persons (of any race)
27.4% of all black persons.
Which means 22,131,774 whites live in poverty, and 10,666,634 blacks live in poverty. For every 1 black person that lives in poverty, there are 2 whites that live in poverty. Yet despite this huge discrepancy in numbers, blacks are still overwhelmingly involved in all crimes. Far beyond white people.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
Mr Walkway, you are becoming a real shitbag with all of this racebaiting.
[/quote]
take it however you want, I just feel compelled to post what would otherwise get swept under the rug.
this man died to protect your and my generation from fascism… I think his last moments deserve a little respect and recognition… so we can have a moment of silence to acknowledge him. [/quote]
That is a bunch of snarky bullshit and you know it.
You are taking advantage of the fact that the guy was killed for your own titillation.
Hence You = Shitbag.
[/quote]
brb gunna smash my head with a brick a few times so I can bring myself to your level lmao
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
What I find really funny is that, Walkway, you love to bash, “liberals,” but this is liberal play # 1. Take a tragedy and twist it to your agenda, which of course we all know is to:
A.) Be racist
B.) Bait the black posters here into yet another race thread. [/quote]
my agenda? I feel like you have to be in a distinct position of power in order for this to be relevant… which I am not.
I feel like you of all people would have an appreciation for this man… perhaps you aren’t learned enough to fully understand the horrors of what he protected us from with his service.
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
I apparently care they were black? No, I don’t. I do, however, care that you’re the kind of dolt who believes someone is racially profiled without any evidence to suggest that were the case.
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
I apparently care they were black? No, I don’t. I do, however, care that you’re the kind of dolt who believes someone is racially profiled without any evidence to suggest that were the case.[/quote]
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
I apparently care they were black? No, I don’t. I do, however, care that you’re the kind of dolt who believes someone is racially profiled without any evidence to suggest that were the case.[/quote]
Oh, you mean like America?[/quote]
America what? Believes that Trayvon Martin was profiled because he was black? I think America does probably believe that. America is in the business of believing things without evidence, after all.
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
I apparently care they were black? No, I don’t. I do, however, care that you’re the kind of dolt who believes someone is racially profiled without any evidence to suggest that were the case.[/quote]
Oh, you mean like America?[/quote]
America what? Believes that Trayvon Martin was profiled because he was black?[/quote]
Wait…you didn’t understand that THIS was the issue from the start?
[quote]
I think America does probably believe that. America is in the business of believing things without evidence, after all.[/quote]
Oh, you mean like racial profiling causing cops to follow black people without evidence because they are black?
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Do you think these stats, if accurate, are because of skin color?[/quote]
It seems that people of a certain skin color, do commit more crimes than others. If you’re suggesting that black crimes are over-represented due to racism, I think that’s bs. It would be quite the stretch to get black people to be responsible for over half of all the crimes committed on racism alone.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Not only that, but due to profiling, why is anyone shocked that you arrest more of the people you constantly look at?[/quote]
How do you racial profile someone for homicide, theft and such crimes that are not “attempts”?
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
What does carjacking have to do with interracial murder?
How many violent acts are committed by youths? or rather what % of violent crime is committed by youths?
The thread is about 2 black kids killing a WII vet.
How do these other stats support your post?
Again, from your own link:
Homicide
According to the United States Department of Justice, whites accounted for 45.3% of all homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, blacks accounted for 52.5%, with 2.2% Native Americans and Asians. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most murders were intraracial, with 84% of white homicide victims murdered by whites, and 93% of black victims murdered by blacks.
[/quote]
It points to a larger issue. A larger issue that a huge percentage of crimes are committed by a minority. I think the “racism” pendulum has swung the wrong way. Political correctness and affirmative action have run amuck.
EVERY fucking time a black person is killed by a white person, they always ask “was it a hate crime”? That has almost never been asked when a black person has killed a white person. Why is that?
Why did the Zimmerman-Martin case cause riots but a black woman blowtorching a young boy to death didn’t? Why was it ok for black boys to kill white 12 year old girls? How about for a group of black men to kill a couple, but not before raping the woman and pouring bleach in her mouth, vagina and asshole, while she was alive, so that they could destroy their DNA traces?
I actually found something interesting:
Seems whites commit way more crimes now. I’m getting conflicting statistics from different sources. I wonder if these states are still biased against blacks? What say you, Prof X and co?
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
What I find really funny is that, Walkway, you love to bash, “liberals,” but this is liberal play # 1. Take a tragedy and twist it to your agenda, which of course we all know is to:
A.) Be racist
B.) Bait the black posters here into yet another race thread. [/quote]
my agenda? I feel like you have to be in a distinct position of power in order for this to be relevant… which I am not.
I feel like you of all people would have an appreciation for this man… perhaps you aren’t learned enough to fully understand the horrors of what he protected us from with his service.
anyways, carry on[/quote]
You’re damn right I of all people do appreciate a man like this, you have no idea how pissed off I am that a war hero especially a WWII vet, died this way, but you and I both know you didn’t start this thread for him.
Anyone can have an agenda, yours is obvious to anyone that can read. Learned enough? Get real Walkway.
I do appreciate your new approach though. Early 2013 Walkway was a bit to abrasive for me. The more subtle approach is much better, imo.
How do you racial profile someone for homicide, theft and such crimes that are not “attempts”?
[/quote]
At that stage, you would look into how some races are convicted of the same crimes with harsher penalties or convicted at all than other races.
Racial profiling also involves who gets brought in as a suspect…and the many people getting let off free due to new DNA testing proves that there is a huge racial fault in INNOCENT PEOPLE getting convicted for crimes they did not commit.
You’re damn right I of all people do appreciate a man like this, you have no idea how pissed off I am that a war hero especially a WWII vet, died this way, but you and I both know you didn’t start this thread for him.
[/quote]
…and that is why I am continuing to respond…because the bullshit is creeping too high in here.
These people don’t care about this man anymore than they care about anyone else who died today outside their close circle of family and friends.
It simply fits the agenda to pretend…and I would hope any real veteran would hate that shit.
Oh, I forgot. It’s OK to say Martin was racially profiled without any evidence to support the idea. It would, of course, not be OK for anyone to speculate that this man was profiled because he was white. Wash, rinse, repeat.[/quote]
Since when are whites profiled by authority figures who can take away your freedom like the legal system?
You are relating law enforcement looking at me more to some uneducated criminals?
[quote]
I don’t care that these scumbags were black. Catch them, kill them, and be done with it.[/quote]
You apparently do care because you made this post relating criminals to law enforcement.[/quote]
I apparently care they were black? No, I don’t. I do, however, care that you’re the kind of dolt who believes someone is racially profiled without any evidence to suggest that were the case.[/quote]
Oh, you mean like America?[/quote]
America what? Believes that Trayvon Martin was profiled because he was black?[/quote]
Wait…you didn’t understand that THIS was the issue from the start?
[quote]
I think America does probably believe that. America is in the business of believing things without evidence, after all.[/quote]
Oh, you mean like racial profiling causing cops to follow black people without evidence because they are black?[/quote]
Yes, I understood that…hence my original post, which you somehow turned into something else. I agree, though. It’s definitely an issue when America believes someone was racially profiled despite a lack of evidence that he was racially profiled. I hope you see my point here because I’m not going to make it again.