I vote to get rid of this JonBenet photoshop and go back to the last one. BTW, can I get a poster of the last one?
I agree. My poster may be sent with my next Biotest order.
[quote]on edge wrote:
I vote to get rid of this JonBenet photoshop and go back to the last one. BTW, can I get a poster of the last one?[/quote]
That is heartless beyond heartless.
It doesn’t look that girls gets ANY exercise, other than taking her clothes off and putting them back on again.
She has the beginnings of “skinny-fat” (fat-skinny?) thighs, and there should be at least some semblance of a triceps muscle by the way she’s got her arm locked.
She doesn’t even look real.
i think shes got a great body! the perfect feminine body. and a gorgeous face.
[quote]on edge wrote:
I vote to get rid of this JonBenet photoshop and go back to the last one. BTW, can I get a poster of the last one?[/quote]
Ditto. This one doesn’t even look legal
I was thinking the same thing, she looks pre-teen. We got ourselves some kiddie porn here.
I like the pics that really make me think “powerful”, like that hella-cool Milo cover of that woman doing some throw at full extension.
I also like the old school pics from muscle beach, with guys balancing a couple of Betty Pages from each outstretched arm.
About ever fifth PI seems to be some random internet semi-porn.
[quote]medevac wrote:
I like the pics that really make me think “powerful”, like that hella-cool Milo cover of that woman doing some throw at full extension.
I also like the old school pics from muscle beach, with guys balancing a couple of Betty Pages from each outstretched arm.
About ever fifth PI seems to be some random internet semi-porn.[/quote]
How many times does it need to be said?
Monday is a male BBer or athlete.
Wednesday is a female BBer or athlete.
Friday is “hot chick” day.
This week we had an extra chick on Tuesday. And that was very nice.
[quote]OneEye wrote:
medevac wrote:
I like the pics that really make me think “powerful”, like that hella-cool Milo cover of that woman doing some throw at full extension.
I also like the old school pics from muscle beach, with guys balancing a couple of Betty Pages from each outstretched arm.
About ever fifth PI seems to be some random internet semi-porn.
How many times does it need to be said?
Monday is a male BBer or athlete.
Wednesday is a female BBer or athlete.
Friday is “hot chick” day.
This week we had an extra chick on Tuesday. And that was very nice.[/quote]
I always just assumed it was random. I don’t mind hot chicks like the Mandy Blank-type pics but the bent-over thong pics with girls that don’t seem like they even work out seem out of place.
Not that I don’t look at them mind you, I just don’t expect to see them on T-Nation.
Certainly doesn’t offend me in any way.
Her eyes look real big and her face overall looks alomst like a cartoon. Very pretty girl, but almost looks fake.
[quote]on edge wrote:
I vote to get rid of this JonBenet photoshop and go back to the last one. BTW, can I get a poster of the last one?[/quote]
Haha I’ve never started a topic, but I was going to about the last image. Wow. Today’s image is gross. The last image was of Annett, anyone know her last name? And if you find a poster, let me know, seriously.
Perhaps we should show a little faith in the folks that choose the pics.
Do you seriously think they’d intentionally post “kiddie porn” or manipulated shit on this site?
Just enjoy and ease up on the accusations.
[quote]duke wrote:
Perhaps we should show a little faith in the folks that choose the pics.
Do you seriously think they’d intentionally post “kiddie porn” or manipulated shit on this site?
Just enjoy and ease up on the accusations.[/quote]
Maybe not intentionally honey, but that girl has the face of a twelve year old girl with make up. It is quite disconcerting. Each to their own I guess.
If that girl is 12, then good lord. I think shes got a great feminine body as well. I also agree with duke, i think whoever chooses the Powerful Images probably puts a little thought into it, and would make pretty damn sure its not some underage girl.
[quote]on edge wrote:
I vote to get rid of this JonBenet photoshop and go back to the last one. BTW, can I get a poster of the last one?[/quote]
Well I vote to thump her in the rump. Ha!
Of course to make it more fitting to the site, we can incrporate some bands for the ballistic movements.
[quote]Bittabit wrote:
duke wrote:
Perhaps we should show a little faith in the folks that choose the pics.
Do you seriously think they’d intentionally post “kiddie porn” or manipulated shit on this site?
Just enjoy and ease up on the accusations.
Maybe not intentionally honey, but that girl has the face of a twelve year old girl with make up. It is quite disconcerting. Each to their own I guess.
[/quote]
I’ve seen women who were 29 and looked like they couldn’t pass for 18, and there are girls out there who are probably a few years away from 18 and could pass for much older. So looking at a picture like this is just one big gray area.
Perhaps we should take a poll amongst the guys here and see how many would automatically rule out something with this girl in question strictly based on her picture and how many would at least end up thinking twice if not giving her two thumbs up.
The last powerful image was of a friend of mine up here in Calgary. Her name is Annette Milbers and she has a website annettemilbers.com. Super nice girl with 2 little girls of her own. She introduced me to the term ‘MILF’.
Fish
[quote]medevac wrote:
About ever fifth PI seems to be some random internet semi-porn.[/quote]
And that’s how TC likes it. No use trying to get things to change. Just enjoy the Friday eye candy. The real PI’s come in two more days.
Gheez, I can’t believe guys are complaining about sex kittens. That’s fucked up.