10 Greatest Athletes of All Time

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

I understand, but that agreement is fostered by an agenda. James is nowhere near as explosive or acrobatic as a young Jordan. Go watch Come Fly With Me and then we’ll debate.
[/quote]

I’ve seen both play and I think Lebron is the better athlete. Honestly I don’t even think it’s that close. I see Jordan like a Johnny Unitas or Babe Ruth. Light years ahead of the curve in their respective sports, but would be average or slightly above average in their respective sports today. Jordan is the GOAT because of a combination of how much more athletic he was than his combination has his unparalleled competitiveness (something Lebron lacks).

Jordan > Lebron at baseketball
Lebron > Jordan athletically

In my opinion. [/quote]

This is one of the sillier things I’ve read here in awhile. Believe what you want, dude.
[/quote]

You’re right you’ve cornered the market in all things athletic. Carry on sorry to question your obviously correct opinion.

[/quote]

You’re right, 'cause the NBA is currently populated with 6’6" dudes who can dunk from the foul line, hit their head against the rim and go chest-to-chest in midair with the best crop of centers the league will ever see…
[/quote]

Do you think the NBA is more athletic as a whole now or when Jordan played?
Could Jordan play all 5 positions in his prime?

Jordan is the best baseketball player of all time, period. I do not like James at all. I think he’s a total douche, but he is more athletic in my opinion.

[quote]Airtruth wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

I understand, but that agreement is fostered by an agenda. James is nowhere near as explosive or acrobatic as a young Jordan. Go watch Come Fly With Me and then we’ll debate.
[/quote]

I’ve seen both play and I think Lebron is the better athlete. Honestly I don’t even think it’s that close. I see Jordan like a Johnny Unitas or Babe Ruth. Light years ahead of the curve in their respective sports, but would be average or slightly above average in their respective sports today. Jordan is the GOAT because of a combination of how much more athletic he was than his combination has his unparalleled competitiveness (something Lebron lacks).

Jordan > Lebron at baseketball
Lebron > Jordan athletically

In my opinion. [/quote]

The game has changed a lot but 99% of the people associated with the NBA say Lebron is more athletic. Not being able to directly compare numbers I would say Lebron too but I can only base that on all the people he’s had to guard. He’s had the speed to stay with Terry and Westbrook, Jordan was not the best on PG’s. He’s also had the strength to guard power forwards well.
[/quote]

(SARCASM ALERT)
I don’t want to be the bearer of bad news, but you’re wrong and obviously pushing an agenda. Please don’t make me laugh any harder with your wrong opinion.

Vernon Davis?

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
On another note a poster earlier laughed at Babe Ruth being on the list, but the guy ate hot dogs and drank before, probably during, and after the games and still was an outstanding pitcher for years and had a record stand for what like 100 years. Is that the definition of athleticism?

It took Barry “steroid head” Bonds to break it. [/quote]

If drinking and eating hot dogs is part of athleticism I would like to also add Airtruth to the list.

The old days can be too difficult to assess raw athleticism since they didn’t do measurements or drug testing. His response time could be greatly enhanced by cocaine, confidence bolstered by beer, and competition weakened by having to work t the farm. Numbers he would be one of the greatest, but raw athleticism who knows?

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

Do you think the NBA is more athletic as a whole now or when Jordan played?
Could Jordan play all 5 positions in his prime?

Jordan is the best baseketball player of all time, period. I do not like James at all. I think he’s a total douche, but he is more athletic in my opinion.

[/quote]

White dudes weren’t dunking from the free throw line in 1985

[quote]Airtruth wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

Do you think the NBA is more athletic as a whole now or when Jordan played?
Could Jordan play all 5 positions in his prime?

Jordan is the best baseketball player of all time, period. I do not like James at all. I think he’s a total douche, but he is more athletic in my opinion.

[/quote]

White dudes weren’t dunking from the free throw line in 1985[/quote]
White men cant jump

[quote]PB Andy wrote:
Vernon Davis?[/quote]

overrated. He’s MAYBE a top 5 TE playing right now. Tony Gonzalez is more impressive.

[quote]Airtruth wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
On another note a poster earlier laughed at Babe Ruth being on the list, but the guy ate hot dogs and drank before, probably during, and after the games and still was an outstanding pitcher for years and had a record stand for what like 100 years. Is that the definition of athleticism?

It took Barry “steroid head” Bonds to break it. [/quote]

If drinking and eating hot dogs is part of athleticism I would like to also add Airtruth to the list.

The old days can be too difficult to assess raw athleticism since they didn’t do measurements or drug testing. His response time could be greatly enhanced by cocaine, confidence bolstered by beer, and competition weakened by having to work t the farm. Numbers he would be one of the greatest, but raw athleticism who knows?
[/quote]

What I’m saying is that some athletes have to bust their ass to be the best and some can drink and eat hot dogs during games and still out perform their competition. That’s just plain athleticism to me.

Maybe some would call that talent, but I see them as one in the same.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

I understand, but that agreement is fostered by an agenda. James is nowhere near as explosive or acrobatic as a young Jordan. Go watch Come Fly With Me and then we’ll debate.
[/quote]

I’ve seen both play and I think Lebron is the better athlete. Honestly I don’t even think it’s that close. I see Jordan like a Johnny Unitas or Babe Ruth. Light years ahead of the curve in their respective sports, but would be average or slightly above average in their respective sports today. Jordan is the GOAT because of a combination of how much more athletic he was than his combination has his unparalleled competitiveness (something Lebron lacks).

Jordan > Lebron at baseketball
Lebron > Jordan athletically

In my opinion. [/quote]

The game has changed a lot but 99% of the people associated with the NBA say Lebron is more athletic. Not being able to directly compare numbers I would say Lebron too but I can only base that on all the people he’s had to guard. He’s had the speed to stay with Terry and Westbrook, Jordan was not the best on PG’s. He’s also had the strength to guard power forwards well.
[/quote]

(SARCASM ALERT)
I don’t want to be the bearer of bad news, but you’re wrong and obviously pushing an agenda. Please don’t make me laugh any harder with your wrong opinion.

[/quote]

He played a hobbled Derrick Rose well by sagging 8’. His defense is incredibly overrated. Do or have any of y’all play worth pros or ex-pros? I do fairly often, and of those who played him in his prime say Bryant was a better athlete (and MUCH better player) than James. Quicker first step, jumped way better of two and handled contact way better. Bryant is a li’l more acrobatic, but Jordan probably jumped higher and had a better first step. People that are claiming that James is better are reporters and analysts paid to bring in the NBA ratings. Nothing can stop the NBA’s hype train around its golden goose.

How has Kobayashi not been mentioned with all this talk about hotdogs?

[quote]Airtruth wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

Do you think the NBA is more athletic as a whole now or when Jordan played?
Could Jordan play all 5 positions in his prime?

Jordan is the best baseketball player of all time, period. I do not like James at all. I think he’s a total douche, but he is more athletic in my opinion.

[/quote]

White dudes weren’t dunking from the free throw line in 1985[/quote]

Bet Tom Chambers could’ve. Also wanted to add that Gerald Green is currently the best athlete in the NBA next to Nate Robinson. His sputtered and leaping ability for a guy 6’8" is inhuman.

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]bluebrasil wrote:

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]bluebrasil wrote:
10 of the best, in no particular order:-

Sergei Bubka (polevalt)
Roy Jones Jr (boxing)
Daley Thompson (decathlon)
Roger Federer (tennis)
Ed Moses (400mhurdles)
Lance Armstrong (cycling)
Steven Redgrave (rowing)
Vasily Alexeyev (weightlifting)
Michael Jordan (basketball)
wayne Gretzky (ice hockey)[/quote]

lol wut? this is just a list of the best players in an assortment of sports/ track events. You seriously would put a rower, hurdler, cyclist, weightlifter, ice hockey player, and tennis player in your top 10 ATHLETES? I know it’s a broad question, but geez. Why no Jim Brown? Why are there zero multi-sport athletes on your list? (aside from the decathlete. and even that is splitting hairs.)[/quote]

to pick only american footballers or basketball players or whatever ignores the many many other gifted athletes out there who play other sports. Believe me, no-one round here plays american football.

all of the above athletes were supreme examples of athleticism as defined by the rules of their sport.

who is Jim Brown? let me guess? an american footballer or a basketball player?

(i just checked, he’s an american footballer)

you might want to check out the rest of the world when looking for the best athletes in the world
[/quote]

Jim Brown was also the best Lacrosse player of all time. His athletic talent transcended his profession. Can you say the same for anyone on your list?

My criteria for a great athlete is not just excelling at your chosen sport. Otherwise Jack Nicklaus would have been mentioned by now (or Tiger Woods for that matter).

For an athlete to make my top 10 list, he has to be a game-changer. Deion Sanders is an example in football. He changed the way you look at the cornerback postion (and he was a professional baseball player. that makes him exceptional). Lawrence Taylor had such an unusual combination of size, speed, and explosive power that he revolutionized the way football was played, and what stats were kept (sacks weren’t recorded pre-Taylor).

Multi-sport athletes rank high with me. Guys who were at the top of 2+ sports have to be absurdly athletically gifted. Some athletes make it in their sports based on sheer work ethic with only a modicum of athleticism. This is clearly not the case when players excel in multiple sports.

Guys like Federer, on the other hand, are just barely better at their sport than the previous bests (Sampras immediately comes to mind, and Nadal, a contemporary, is actually better than Federer on clay, and always has been). There’s nothing transcendent about Federer’s talent.

As far as the America-bias, I think that comes from A) I’m American, and have more awareness of what’s going on here, and B) athletes are paid the most here (soccer excluded). This means the greatest athletes have a reason to compete here.

A few international athletes who should get some props: Pele (we’re not talking about him enough), Dirk Nowitzki (he’s an athletic anomaly in his skillset/size combination), mariusz pudzianowski (because, well, look at him).

In summary: I just don’t think a guy who could do one thing really well, a la Lance Armstrong, should be on the list.[/quote]

that all seems entirely reasonable. so on the basis of those rules (which seem ok to me) I’ll change my picks to:-

Daley Thompson
Jeff Wilson (Rugby and Cricket for New Zealand)
Jonty Rhodes (cricket and hockey for South Africa)
Dennis Compton (football and cricket for England)

this isnt an easy list to make!!! 4 will have to do for me

[quote]flipcollar wrote:
WhiteFlash is obviously waaaaaay basketball-biased.

A few guys not mentioned yet:
Sammy Baugh, without a doubt. The dude could play every position in football at a professional level, from kicker to quarterback (set records at both positions). That’s ridiculous. Beyond that, he played basketball and baseball in college AND was signed by the Cardinals. How he hasn’t been mentioned yet blows my mind, he’s absolutely a top 5 candidate.

Joe Mauer is up there, if we’re willing to do some extrapolation on his high school accomplishments. He was the top ranked QB nationally in HS his senior year I believe.

fun fact: Drew Brees beat Andy Roddick in tennis when they were early teens.[/quote]

I actually think White Flash has the best grasp on what I would consider athletic ability.

WF: what’s your thoughts on Allen Iverson? Imagine if he went to England and played soccer??? He could have been dominate in a sport like that.

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

I understand, but that agreement is fostered by an agenda. James is nowhere near as explosive or acrobatic as a young Jordan. Go watch Come Fly With Me and then we’ll debate.
[/quote]

I’ve seen both play and I think Lebron is the better athlete. Honestly I don’t even think it’s that close. I see Jordan like a Johnny Unitas or Babe Ruth. Light years ahead of the curve in their respective sports, but would be average or slightly above average in their respective sports today. Jordan is the GOAT because of a combination of how much more athletic he was than his combination has his unparalleled competitiveness (something Lebron lacks).

Jordan > Lebron at baseketball
Lebron > Jordan athletically

In my opinion. [/quote]

The game has changed a lot but 99% of the people associated with the NBA say Lebron is more athletic. Not being able to directly compare numbers I would say Lebron too but I can only base that on all the people he’s had to guard. He’s had the speed to stay with Terry and Westbrook, Jordan was not the best on PG’s. He’s also had the strength to guard power forwards well.
[/quote]

(SARCASM ALERT)
I don’t want to be the bearer of bad news, but you’re wrong and obviously pushing an agenda. Please don’t make me laugh any harder with your wrong opinion.

[/quote]

He played a hobbled Derrick Rose well by sagging 8’. His defense is incredibly overrated. Do or have any of y’all play worth pros or ex-pros? I do fairly often, and of those who played him in his prime say Bryant was a better athlete (and MUCH better player) than James. Quicker first step, jumped way better of two and handled contact way better. Bryant is a li’l more acrobatic, but Jordan probably jumped higher and had a better first step. People that are claiming that James is better are reporters and analysts paid to bring in the NBA ratings. Nothing can stop the NBA’s hype train around its golden goose.
[/quote]

So you’re basing your opinion off the opinions of others that have played, I’m assuming Kobe, in his prime? Did they also play Lebron and Jordan? How exactly are they making their comparison? Seems to me there is bias there, no?

So is Kobe or Rose a better athlete than Jordan?

If there’s an agenda in the NBA now, I wouldn’t know. I watch very little basketball because I think the NBA sucks, but I’ve seen enough of both players to give an opinion and it’s got nothing to do with what PTI says.

[quote]flipcollar wrote:

[quote]PB Andy wrote:
Vernon Davis?[/quote]

overrated. He’s MAYBE a top 5 TE playing right now. Tony Gonzalez is more impressive.[/quote]
Well, again, what’s the criteria? I’m talking of just raw athleticism.

[quote]Brett620 wrote:

[quote]flipcollar wrote:
WhiteFlash is obviously waaaaaay basketball-biased.

A few guys not mentioned yet:
Sammy Baugh, without a doubt. The dude could play every position in football at a professional level, from kicker to quarterback (set records at both positions). That’s ridiculous. Beyond that, he played basketball and baseball in college AND was signed by the Cardinals. How he hasn’t been mentioned yet blows my mind, he’s absolutely a top 5 candidate.

Joe Mauer is up there, if we’re willing to do some extrapolation on his high school accomplishments. He was the top ranked QB nationally in HS his senior year I believe.

fun fact: Drew Brees beat Andy Roddick in tennis when they were early teens.[/quote]

I actually think White Flash has the best grasp on what I would consider athletic ability.

WF: what’s your thoughts on Allen Iverson? Imagine if he went to England and played soccer??? He could have been dominate in a sport like that. [/quote]

People forget (or never realized) that Iverson was the state player of the year in football as a junior. Never got a chance to play against him, but his speed and quickness were on a completely different level. Not to familiar with soccer, but I imagine if that was his focus he would’ve kicked ass.

Thanks for the compliment, bud.

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
The question is poorly phrased. Try to better explain the criteria. [/quote]

This thread has the same problem it always has when the topic is poorly defined: people argue over who should be on the list before they agree on the criteria for the list.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

Dude, seriously? Speed, strength, leaping ability, hand eye coordination, agility, etc… Jordan would MURDER Ali in everyone of those categories.Jordan could’ve easily been an all-pro receiver in the NFL if he chose. He was easily the most athletic dude of his era in a game dominated by incredibly athletic people. This isn’t even a debate.
[/quote]

Being as Muhammad Ali never played basketball, exactly what are you basing this on?

Speed? Ali’s hands are the fastest of any man his size. Hand eye coordination? Nobody’s hand-eye coordination is better than a boxer’s, forget the fastest of them all.

Agility? Who had better footwork? It’s hard to compare them directly because, oh you know, they PLAYED DIFFERENT SPORTS!

But to say that Ali was as good an athlete as Jordan is not being unrealistic. If Jordan trained for 20 years at boxing, he would have lost to Muhammad Ali, because boxing tests more than just your athleticism.

But if Ali trained for 20 years at basketball… I wonder if he could have been as good. Who knows.[/quote]

To say nobody’s hand eye cordination is better than a boxers, you must have forgot about baseball players?
But another great athlete is Roy Jones Jr. I remeber he played in a minor league basketball game and then defended his world title that night. Something like that.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Airtruth wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

I understand, but that agreement is fostered by an agenda. James is nowhere near as explosive or acrobatic as a young Jordan. Go watch Come Fly With Me and then we’ll debate.
[/quote]

I’ve seen both play and I think Lebron is the better athlete. Honestly I don’t even think it’s that close. I see Jordan like a Johnny Unitas or Babe Ruth. Light years ahead of the curve in their respective sports, but would be average or slightly above average in their respective sports today. Jordan is the GOAT because of a combination of how much more athletic he was than his combination has his unparalleled competitiveness (something Lebron lacks).

Jordan > Lebron at baseketball
Lebron > Jordan athletically

In my opinion. [/quote]

The game has changed a lot but 99% of the people associated with the NBA say Lebron is more athletic. Not being able to directly compare numbers I would say Lebron too but I can only base that on all the people he’s had to guard. He’s had the speed to stay with Terry and Westbrook, Jordan was not the best on PG’s. He’s also had the strength to guard power forwards well.
[/quote]

(SARCASM ALERT)
I don’t want to be the bearer of bad news, but you’re wrong and obviously pushing an agenda. Please don’t make me laugh any harder with your wrong opinion.

[/quote]

He played a hobbled Derrick Rose well by sagging 8’. His defense is incredibly overrated. Do or have any of y’all play worth pros or ex-pros? I do fairly often, and of those who played him in his prime say Bryant was a better athlete (and MUCH better player) than James. Quicker first step, jumped way better of two and handled contact way better. Bryant is a li’l more acrobatic, but Jordan probably jumped higher and had a better first step. People that are claiming that James is better are reporters and analysts paid to bring in the NBA ratings. Nothing can stop the NBA’s hype train around its golden goose.
[/quote]

So you’re basing your opinion off the opinions of others that have played, I’m assuming Kobe, in his prime? Did they also play Lebron and Jordan? How exactly are they making their comparison? Seems to me there is bias there, no?

So is Kobe or Rose a better athlete than Jordan?

If there’s an agenda in the NBA now, I wouldn’t know. I watch very little basketball because I think the NBA sucks, but I’ve seen enough of both players to give an opinion and it’s got nothing to do with what PTI says. [/quote]

They played both (Bryant and James) in their primes. I’d say Jordan and Bryant are comparable athletes, with Jordan having a slight edge in speed, hops and strength and Bryant having a slight edge in agility and mid-air acrobatics.

Rose is a modern day Steve Francis, though probably slightly less explosive.

Also, no offense is meant or intended by anything I say. I’m enjoying killing time at work rapping with y’all.

Haloti Ngata