[quote]Waylon wrote:
That’s the beauty, if it’s ok not to follow this law because it’s morally objectionable, what other laws can I ignore because I find them objectionable. [/quote]
If the slipper slope fallacy is valid in this case, then it is valid in all others too. Please tell me you oppose gun control.
We already have this:
murder is illegal - except when it is a baby in the womb or the state condones it
theft is illegal - except when the government/government buddies do it
discrimination based on race and sex is illegal - unless it is a white person or male discriminated against.
Minimum wage - expect when Liz Warren doesn’t want to pay her interns
Like, come the fuck on with this.
[/quote]
Bean stick with TAXES Science is beyond you , A mass of cells , that are human do not equal a person . Yeah you can try and stretch that point but it is incorrect
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Bean stick with TAXES Science is beyond you , A mass of cells , that are human do not equal a person . Yeah you can try and stretch that point but it is incorrect
[/quote]
Link me evidence this moronic dribble you just posted is validated by “scientists”.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Bean stick with TAXES Science is beyond you , A mass of cells , that are human do not equal a person . Yeah you can try and stretch that point but it is incorrect
[/quote]
Also, please link me valid evidence of when personhood begins then.
Science only knows the life cycle of the same individual human organism. Person is a fiction. Takes a crap-ton of faith to believe an innocent human individual isn’t being deliberately killed, simply because you omitted “person.” Flying Spaghetti-Person.
But, I’ll refrain from here. I am too often guilty of participating in taking a thread off course, even if it is somewhat related.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Bean stick with TAXES Science is beyond you , A mass of cells , that are human do not equal a person . Yeah you can try and stretch that point but it is incorrect
[/quote]
Link me evidence this moronic dribble you just posted is validated by “scientists”.
[/quote]
no you link me , to your idiotic partisan bullshit
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Science only knows the life cycle of the same individual human organism. Person is a fiction. Takes a crap-ton of faith to believe an innocent human individual isn’t being deliberately killed, simply because you omitted “person.” Flying Spaghetti-Person.
[/quote]
WHAT the fuck you talking about ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Bean stick with TAXES Science is beyond you , A mass of cells , that are human do not equal a person . Yeah you can try and stretch that point but it is incorrect
[/quote]
Link me evidence this moronic dribble you just posted is validated by “scientists”.
[/quote]
no you link me , to your idiotic partisan bullshit
[/quote]
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Bean stick with TAXES Science is beyond you , A mass of cells , that are human do not equal a person . Yeah you can try and stretch that point but it is incorrect
[/quote]
Link me evidence this moronic dribble you just posted is validated by “scientists”.
[/quote]
no you link me , to your idiotic partisan bullshit
[/quote]
translation: you can’t.
lmao.
You made the claim of fact, you can’t back it up… [/quote]
I will word it different for you your claim that “a mass of cells is a person” statement that only some one with a numb skull would make
My claim that a mass of cells albeit human does not equal a person is spot on and the proof is in your court
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
My claim that a mass of cells albeit human does not equal a person is spot on[/quote]
Again, link proof of this position.
You’ve been tasked to do it before, and never, ever do. Because you can’t.
[quote] and the proof is in your court
[/quote]
ummm… My statement:
Murder is illegal unless it is a baby in the womb or condoned by the state
My proof:
“The current judicial interpretation of the U.S. Constitution regarding abortion in the United States, following the Supreme Court of the United States’s 1973 landmark decision in Roe v. Wade, and subsequent companion decisions, is that abortion is legal”
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Science only knows the life cycle of the same individual human organism. Person is a fiction. Takes a crap-ton of faith to believe an innocent human individual isn’t being deliberately killed, simply because you omitted “person.” Flying Spaghetti-Person.
[/quote]
WHAT the fuck you talking about ?
[/quote]
I hope you’ll take the time to reread and think on it. Good day.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
My claim that a mass of cells albeit human does not equal a person is spot on[/quote]
Again, link proof of this position.
You’ve been tasked to do it before, and never, ever do. Because you can’t.
[quote] and the proof is in your court
[/quote]
ummm… My statement:
Murder is illegal unless it is a baby in the womb or condoned by the state
My proof:
“The current judicial interpretation of the U.S. Constitution regarding abortion in the United States, following the Supreme Court of the United States’s 1973 landmark decision in Roe v. Wade, and subsequent companion decisions, is that abortion is legal”
And:
Your turn. But you won’t, because you can’t.
[/quote]
we would agree you posted the legal decision of Roe VS: Wade and an artcle on death penalty .
Your proof has to be either scientific or legal where a killing a mass of cells that is not viable is murder .
My statement needs no proof it is apparent a mass of cells is just that a mass of cells
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
My claim that a mass of cells albeit human does not equal a person is spot on[/quote]
Again, link proof of this position.
You’ve been tasked to do it before, and never, ever do. Because you can’t.
[quote] and the proof is in your court
[/quote]
ummm… My statement:
Murder is illegal unless it is a baby in the womb or condoned by the state
My proof:
“The current judicial interpretation of the U.S. Constitution regarding abortion in the United States, following the Supreme Court of the United States’s 1973 landmark decision in Roe v. Wade, and subsequent companion decisions, is that abortion is legal”
And:
Your turn. But you won’t, because you can’t.
[/quote]
we would agree you posted the legal decision of Roe VS: Wade and an artcle on death penalty .
Your proof has to be either scientific or legal where a killing a mass of cells that is not viable is murder .
My statement needs no proof it is apparent a mass of cells is just that a mass of cells
[/quote]
“The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if he or she is injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines “child in utero” as “a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb”.[1]”
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act was strongly opposed by most pro-choice organizations, on grounds that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision said that the human fetus is not a “person” under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and that if the fetus were a Fourteenth Amendment “person,” then he or she would have a constitutional right to life. However, the laws of 38 states also recognize the human fetus as the legal victim of homicide (and often, other violent crimes) during the entire period of pre-natal development (27 states) or during part of the pre-natal period (nine states).[8] Legal challenges to these laws, arguing that they violate Roe v. Wade or other U.S. Supreme Court precedents, have been uniformly rejected by both the federal and the state courts, including the supreme courts of California, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota.[9]
I did not state that no one had the opinion that a fetus was not a person . I am sure some where a long the line I would even consider it a person . But we are talking about a clump of cells .
