Would a Guy Ever be Able to Argue this Defense?

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Can we allow just anyone to have a fully automatic vagina though? I mean, they refer to the switch that goes from semi to auto as the “giggle switch”.

There is no other point to a full-auto vagina other than mass destruction of hard targets. Can the average Joe handle a giggle switch on a vagina?[/quote]

Absolutely!

The problem is, many people don’t know how to use the giggle switch properly. They either rely on it, or don’t use it responsibly.

I think giggle switch classes should be mandatory if we can keep our auto vaginas.[/quote]

Will we require background checks before one can handle a vagina?

Also, in public, must the vagina be concealed, or is open carry allowed?[/quote]

I think background checks are mandatory, CB. Otherwise, irresponsible use of vaginas would be widespread and known felons with loaded vaginas would be armed to the teeth.

I agree with Sky’S stance on the conceal/open carry vagina.

Personally, I’d want a small vagina for open carry. It’s just more comfortable to me.
[/quote]

I completely missed the background check issue. That is a must. Picture a guy walking into a nightclub loaded with easily obtained and cheaply made vags, giggle switch on and ready to roll. The direct carnage would be heart wrenching, and the aftermath to be undured by witnesses and survivors would exacerbate the vagitragity.

Before anybody even knew what hit them

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
Not hot. Shes got too much chin…chin to lip ratio is everything.

[/quote]

I like her chin. Bigger surface area means anything I don’t get directly into her mouth still has a good chance of staying on her face.

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Can we allow just anyone to have a fully automatic vagina though? I mean, they refer to the switch that goes from semi to auto as the “giggle switch”.

There is no other point to a full-auto vagina other than mass destruction of hard targets. Can the average Joe handle a giggle switch on a vagina?[/quote]

Absolutely!

The problem is, many people don’t know how to use the giggle switch properly. They either rely on it, or don’t use it responsibly.

I think giggle switch classes should be mandatory if we can keep our auto vaginas.[/quote]

Will we require background checks before one can handle a vagina?

Also, in public, must the vagina be concealed, or is open carry allowed?[/quote]

I think background checks are mandatory, CB. Otherwise, irresponsible use of vaginas would be widespread and known felons with loaded vaginas would be armed to the teeth.

I agree with Sky’S stance on the conceal/open carry vagina.

Personally, I’d want a small vagina for open carry. It’s just more comfortable to me.
[/quote]

I completely missed the background check issue. That is a must. Picture a guy walking into a nightclub loaded with easily obtained and cheaply made vags, giggle switch on and ready to roll. The direct carnage would be heart wrenching, and the aftermath to be undured by witnesses and survivors would exacerbate the vagitragity.

Before anybody even knew what hit them[/quote]

I have a question as to how one would clean a fully auto vagina? I’d imagine one would need a long hard instrument to full reach all areas of the FAV?

It’s amazing how fast she was able to shoot him, stab him 27 times and slit his throat. According to the time stamps on her camera it only took two minutes. She took a picture of him alive in the bathroom at something like 5:33pm and another one with him dead at 5:35.

In addition to being a hell of a fuck (whoever said that above, nobody would take that bet, it’s a sure thing), she’s got to be a hell of a photographer too. She showed supreme dedication to her craft.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
Not hot. Shes got too much chin…chin to lip ratio is everything.

[/quote]

I like her chin. Bigger surface area means anything I don’t get directly into her mouth still has a good chance of staying on her face.[/quote]

It doesnt matter what you like jabroni.

[quote]Swolegasm wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Can we allow just anyone to have a fully automatic vagina though? I mean, they refer to the switch that goes from semi to auto as the “giggle switch”.

There is no other point to a full-auto vagina other than mass destruction of hard targets. Can the average Joe handle a giggle switch on a vagina?[/quote]

Absolutely!

The problem is, many people don’t know how to use the giggle switch properly. They either rely on it, or don’t use it responsibly.

I think giggle switch classes should be mandatory if we can keep our auto vaginas.[/quote]

Will we require background checks before one can handle a vagina?

Also, in public, must the vagina be concealed, or is open carry allowed?[/quote]

I think background checks are mandatory, CB. Otherwise, irresponsible use of vaginas would be widespread and known felons with loaded vaginas would be armed to the teeth.

I agree with Sky’S stance on the conceal/open carry vagina.

Personally, I’d want a small vagina for open carry. It’s just more comfortable to me.
[/quote]

I completely missed the background check issue. That is a must. Picture a guy walking into a nightclub loaded with easily obtained and cheaply made vags, giggle switch on and ready to roll. The direct carnage would be heart wrenching, and the aftermath to be undured by witnesses and survivors would exacerbate the vagitragity.

Before anybody even knew what hit them[/quote]

I have a question as to how one would clean a fully auto vagina? I’d imagine one would need a long hard instrument to full reach all areas of the FAV? [/quote]

They’re like AK-47s. You can leave them in a sewer to rot for a decade then grab it, bang the crud out and go full retard without missing a beat. No real need to keep them pristine.

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
My money is on fantastic in bed.[/quote]

Yes. Reminds me of the crazy broad that one of the dudes on here was banging. His handle escapes me at the moment though.[/quote]

The guy you speak of is TheThirdRuffian. Indian guy. Crazy white bitch as a GF but they finished with each other? Amazing fake tittays and the like.

[quote]harrypotter wrote:

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
My money is on fantastic in bed.[/quote]

Yes. Reminds me of the crazy broad that one of the dudes on here was banging. His handle escapes me at the moment though.[/quote]

The guy you speak of is TheThirdRuffian. Indian guy. Crazy white bitch as a GF but they finished with each other? Amazing fake tittays and the like.[/quote]

Yeah I just came in here to say I remembered his name.

It is unbelievable how pathologic she is:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Can we allow just anyone to have a fully automatic vagina though? I mean, they refer to the switch that goes from semi to auto as the “giggle switch”.

There is no other point to a full-auto vagina other than mass destruction of hard targets. Can the average Joe handle a giggle switch on a vagina?[/quote]

Absolutely!

The problem is, many people don’t know how to use the giggle switch properly. They either rely on it, or don’t use it responsibly.

I think giggle switch classes should be mandatory if we can keep our auto vaginas.[/quote]

Will we require background checks before one can handle a vagina?

Also, in public, must the vagina be concealed, or is open carry allowed?[/quote]

I think background checks are mandatory, CB. Otherwise, irresponsible use of vaginas would be widespread and known felons with loaded vaginas would be armed to the teeth.

I agree with Sky’S stance on the conceal/open carry vagina.

Personally, I’d want a small vagina for open carry. It’s just more comfortable to me.
[/quote]

I completely missed the background check issue. That is a must. Picture a guy walking into a nightclub loaded with easily obtained and cheaply made vags, giggle switch on and ready to roll. The direct carnage would be heart wrenching, and the aftermath to be undured by witnesses and survivors would exacerbate the vagitragity.

Before anybody even knew what hit them[/quote]

Only ban those with Clit and G-spot attachments. Am I right? right???

What a difference make up and a bleach job can make. Guilty.

[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
What a difference make up and a bleach job can make. Guilty.[/quote]

That’s a bad picture. She still looks basically good. Most guys would fuck her.

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]harrypotter wrote:

[quote]Steel Nation wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
My money is on fantastic in bed.[/quote]

Yes. Reminds me of the crazy broad that one of the dudes on here was banging. His handle escapes me at the moment though.[/quote]

The guy you speak of is TheThirdRuffian. Indian guy. Crazy white bitch as a GF but they finished with each other? Amazing fake tittays and the like.[/quote]

Yeah I just came in here to say I remembered his name. [/quote]

My pyscho was much hotter.

I’d post pictures, but I got put in T-Nation jail after I did — all my messages are now reviewed before posting.

She looks kind of like Whitney Cummings. And this girl looks a lot different in some of her pictures, which makes her look crazy by changing her appearance so much.

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Best post ever!

[quote]imhungry wrote:
Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Best post ever![/quote]

Yes, but you’re forgetting a vital piece of this puzzle. Is a 30-round vagina too excessive? What about assault vaginas? Should civilians be allowed to carry these without a special permit?

So many unanswered questions…

[quote]Ripsaw3689 wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Best post ever![/quote]

Yes, but you’re forgetting a vital piece of this puzzle. Is a 30-round vagina too excessive? What about assault vaginas? Should civilians be allowed to carry these without a special permit?

So many unanswered questions…[/quote]

Open carry vaginas are the only way to go. No more concealed vaginas!

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]Ripsaw3689 wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
We need an assult vagina ban, and we need it now.

Where is congress when you need them?[/quote]

Vaginas are only as dangerous as the people who wield them.

I say, give EVERYONE a vagina. This way, everyone has a chance if you’re attacked by psycho with an assault vagina.[/quote]

Best post ever![/quote]

Yes, but you’re forgetting a vital piece of this puzzle. Is a 30-round vagina too excessive? What about assault vaginas? Should civilians be allowed to carry these without a special permit?

So many unanswered questions…[/quote]

Open carry vaginas are the only way to go. No more concealed vaginas! [/quote]

Yeah, but 30 rounds!?

I mean, I can only knock off 6 rounds, while this guy has a vagina that can do 30?!? That’s just fucked up. I can’t compete with that.