Winner Of The Presidential Election is....

[quote]Mufasa wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Also Gloria Allred is pursuing to lift a gag order about a case with sworn testimony by Romney.

Speculation is that the case involves women.[/quote]

According to ace of spades it looks like it will be a double whammy attack on his religion and abortion at the same time…

If that is the case. I’m ashamed to say it, but the sliver of respect I had for obama, will be gone, forever.

EDIT: or “forcing” a woman to give her baby up…

Either way, I just can’t believe the same media that let Rev Write go untouched will hammer this anti-mormon story.[/quote]

Whoa, CB.

The President would have no more sway over Allred than Romney has over Trump, correct?

I also think that they BOTH (Allred and Trump) would look like fools with what appear to be last minute stunts.

Concerning Romney…is this about swaying women away from getting abortions and/or encouraging adoption or something? I don’t see how this could be a negative for the base.

I just don’t see either man (the President or Romney) condoning ANY of this crap.

Mufasa[/quote]

Well, this kind of shit is the way Obama won every election he did until 2008.

We both know Obama won’t denounce it…

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
Do you guys believe rioting will occur if Obama loses?

Something substantial not just a handful of dickheads[/quote]

Why would that take place? It’s never happened in mondern times (or ever I think). Why would it happen now?

Also, don’t count Obama out Romney must win Ohio, Florida and a couple other swing states to ice this. This election could easily go either way. [/quote]

Because of the race angle. [/quote]

"Not only have Obama voters been making open threats that they will riot and cause mayhem, they have also been caught making direct threats to assassinate Mitt Romney, prompting the Secret Service to announce that it was “aware” of the threats and would “conduct appropriate follow up if necessary.” Before the Secret Service announced they were investigating the threats, Obama front group Think Progress attempted to imply that the whole story was somehow a racist contrivance dreamed up…

From twitter, scores of Obama drones threaten to assassinate Romney:

Douche Kabob: “If Romney becomes president don’t be surprised if I assassinate him.”

Dylan McKelvey: “If Romney becomes president…I will personally assassinate him.”

CH3VY: “Someone tell this cracker get off Romney dick and assassinate his ass.”

Artie Francis: “Ima assassinate Romney if he win!”

Daniel Cudder: “Why can’t someone just assassinate Romney?”

Wickedd’gamess: “if romney win imma assassinate his aah”

Kameko: “If someone just assassinate romney everything will go back as planned”

CallMe_Mayb_: “Romney wins? Lets assassinate that little cock sucker”

raegae: “If Romney get president I’ll walk around sayin ill assassinate his mfkin ass…Ifgaf. Fuck the police”

Emilee Grace: “ROMNEY I’M GONNA FUCKING ASSASSINATE YOU.”

Smokahontas: “Somebody assassinate this fool ass nigga Romney BEFORE he become president”

It goes on like this.

In related news, as well as being a coke head there are now claims surfacing that the President was a coke dealer…

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

In related news, as well as being a coke head there are now claims surfacing that the President was a coke dealer…

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/10/president-obama-sold-cocaine-college-trump-charges-republicans-reject[/quote]

Aha! So the POTUS does have business experience.

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

In related news, as well as being a coke head there are now claims surfacing that the President was a coke dealer…

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/10/president-obama-sold-cocaine-college-trump-charges-republicans-reject[/quote]

Aha! So the POTUS does have business experience.[/quote]

Ha ha! Good one.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
Do you guys believe rioting will occur if Obama loses?

Something substantial not just a handful of dickheads[/quote]

Why would that take place? It’s never happened in mondern times (or ever I think). Why would it happen now?

Also, don’t count Obama out Romney must win Ohio, Florida and a couple other swing states to ice this. This election could easily go either way. [/quote]

Because of the race angle. [/quote]

Well… If they did it would ruin any hope electing a black man gave us that we have began healing from the horrid transgressions of those Americans that came before us.

I see your ridiculous Democrats and call with ridiculous Republicans:

(I know, wiki is awful but this is so preposterous I don’t feel like devoting time to it)

Again-people are people. Both sides are chock full o’ nuts on the fringes…

And hey, if Obama dealt coke, at least we know he has experience working in an unregulated market for a small business! :-D…but seriously, if this is what the next couple weeks have to offer, I think I may flee from news before I drown in the bullshit…

edit-beaten to the punchline

Romney met with Trump? Obviously he was desperate before the first debate turned things arond and called on him for help!
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/trump-to-meet-with-romney-in-new-york/

And anti-Islamists!

From the article, all it stated was Obama talked to a group of black pastors about “getting out the vote”. One of them was a pastor who is IMO an extremist but still somebody with access to a large group of people who he can persuade to go vote. Personally, I don’t like involving religion in politics EVER (aside: the group of pastors publicly endorsing candidates from the pulpit and mailing the videos to the IRS to flaunt their defiance make me sick) but IF the pastors simply promote voting, that probably is a loophole so long as they don’t endorse Obama directly. It’s a dirty loophole since I would imagine their congregations will support Obama (why else would he reach out) but one both sides have been using.

Other than that, it’s simply people who have met Obama and are playing dirty. I honestly believe him to be as responsible for these happenings as Romney is for Trump or any other nut who he has met with.

Say it with me friends, together in unison…

PAH-THEH-TIC (both of them if they pursue this).

But the pressure is more on Allred, since she has to get a judicial order to lift a gag order, Trump can run his mouth at any time.

[quote]CornSprint wrote:

And anti-Islamists!

[/quote]

Yes, we won’t have to worry about Barack Hussein Obama meeting with such people. The future doesn’t belong to them.

Why do I get the feeling, that the next 2 weeks will be something akin to some Jerry Springer type shit.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
Do you guys believe rioting will occur if Obama loses?

Something substantial not just a handful of dickheads[/quote]

Why would that take place? It’s never happened in mondern times (or ever I think). Why would it happen now?

Also, don’t count Obama out Romney must win Ohio, Florida and a couple other swing states to ice this. This election could easily go either way. [/quote]

Because of the race angle. [/quote]

Yeah, their are probably some radicals who will try to incite some sort of riot. But I wouldn’t think it would have much traction.

[quote]Mufasa wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Also Gloria Allred is pursuing to lift a gag order about a case with sworn testimony by Romney.

Speculation is that the case involves women.[/quote]

According to ace of spades it looks like it will be a double whammy attack on his religion and abortion at the same time…

If that is the case. I’m ashamed to say it, but the sliver of respect I had for obama, will be gone, forever.

EDIT: or “forcing” a woman to give her baby up…

Either way, I just can’t believe the same media that let Rev Write go untouched will hammer this anti-mormon story.[/quote]

Whoa, CB.

The President would have no more sway over Allred than Romney has over Trump, correct?

I also think that they BOTH (Allred and Trump) would look like fools with what appear to be last minute stunts.

Concerning Romney…is this about swaying women away from getting abortions and/or encouraging adoption or something? I don’t see how this could be a negative for the base.

I just don’t see either man (the President or Romney) condoning ANY of this crap.

Mufasa[/quote]

They will pretty much do whatever works.

And this is one I want you to write down as I am about to make a prediction.

There WILL be an October surprise on the part of Obama. I don’t know what it will be. But it could be that they have the Navy Seals shoot a couple of Middle Eastern terrorists and claim those are the same ones who killed the Ambassador.

Just a guess, it could be something entirely different. BUT, there WILL be an October surprise by Obama if he is down in the polls I am absolutely certain of it!

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]CornSprint wrote:

And anti-Islamists!

[/quote]

Yes, we won’t have to worry about Barack Hussein Obama meeting with such people. The future doesn’t belong to them.

http://www.investigativeproject.org/3777/a-red-carpet-for-radicals-at-the-white-house[/quote]

Holy Islamofascist, Batman. This truly is some (warranted) dirt on Bam.[/quote]

Just watch the mainstream media run with this one…(silence)

A series of internal State Department emails obtained by Fox News shows some some of the initial assessments of last month’s deadly consulate attack in Libya, including one email within hours of the attack that noted that the group Ansar al Sharia had claimed responsibility.

Ansar al Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be a an Al Qaeda-affiliated group. A member of the group suspected of participating in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi has been arrested and is being held in Tunisia.

The emails obtained by Fox News were sent by the State Department to a variety of national security platforms, whose addresses have been redacted, including the White House Situation Room, the Pentagon, the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence.

Fox News was told that an estimated 300 to 400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. People who received these emails work directly under the nation?s top national security, military and diplomatic officials, Fox News was told.

The timestamps on the emails are all Eastern Time and often include the subheading SBU?which is shorthand for ?Sensitive But Unclassified.?

The first email indicates that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.” Officials later discovered that Stevens and three other Americans had died in the attack.

The first email was sent at 4:05 p.m. ET with the subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”

“The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack,” the email reads. "Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.

“The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

The second email came at 4:54 p.m. ET, with a subject line “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

The third email came at 6:07 p.m. ET and was sent to a different email list but still includes the White House Situation Room address and a subject line of “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli,” the email reads.

Read more: State Department emails from day of Libya attack show militant group on radar | Fox News

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Why do I get the feeling, that the next 2 weeks will be something akin to some Jerry Springer type shit. [/quote]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails-idUSBRE89N02C20121024

Just posted this in Libya thread. Figured I’d add it into the Frey here too.

EDIT: sloth beat me to it.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Why do I get the feeling, that the next 2 weeks will be something akin to some Jerry Springer type shit. [/quote]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails-idUSBRE89N02C20121024

Just posted this in Libya thread. Figured I’d add it into the Frey here too.[/quote]

In other words, “since we are so close to election day, and I am fighting my ass off to get reelected, I won’t call this a terrorist attack, at least not right now, because I don’t need this bad press right now” was the real dealio about Libya ?

Smokahontas: “Somebody assassinate this fool ass n**** Romney BEFORE he become president”

Romney’s black? Well I’ll be damned …

So, Huffington Joke, oops I mean post already playing the Mormon angle for 13 days, daily beast running some seriously bigoted hateful shit, MSNBC running the debunked Tagg owns the voting machines conspiracy theory…

And then this: Squirrel! Romney packs Red Rocks; libs want to talk … New Deal? – twitchy.com

Yeah, I would say the left is in full on panic mode.