[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
The solution will be a wireless one.[/quote]
In part.
[quote]nephorm wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
The solution will be a wireless one.
In part.[/quote]
Wireless is the only delivery method that requires neither eminent domain nor negation of property rights. Any provider service can set up a delivery station on his or her own property and deliver over a high frequency broadcast to a select region.
Hardwire has too many complications to allow ultimate ownership of delivery; thus we see a monopoly in ISP ownership by telecoms.
The internet will become like radio and TV in its accessibility.
Is this something a single government could do, or is there a need for collusion. In which case it will most likely never happen. I don’t understand how one government could do this, with the internet being world wide. This could end up being very interesting. An internet revolution, what would that be like, count me in!!
Wasn’t there some whore who promised 40,000 blowjobs for net neutrality? She was/is a politician AFAIK.