Why is Sarah an 'Idiot'?

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
61

Unbelievable how some think Palin and Obama are the same. :‘)
Sarah Palin has never showed to have any basic knowledge of or interest in American affairs let alone world affairs. Every goddamn interview of that woman is proof of this. And her farewell speech? My God, how about this load of bullshit created to get some shouts and claps from the audience. Just say ‘Respect the soldiers by…’ first and then make your ‘point’, the audience will love it. :’)

Compare that piece of work to a harvard graduate. Obama actually makes sense. Obama actually feels the need to make sense, a concept lost on some people. And for all you simple minded; that is NOT the same as agreeing or disagreeing with Obama. Clearly some of you disagree with Obama, he still makes more sense than Sarah. I don’t agree with Sarah on some issues, but that doesn’t matter. If she’d been a Dem, nothing would change. She’d still be the dumb hot milf she is today.

In the world of logic, Sarah is an idiot. It’s a fucking disgrace that a woman like that came that close to the vice-presidency.

63

[quote]K2000 wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
the Manchurian got pumped into office with little more than a HUGE anti-Bush movement, which, county by county still looks like a McCain victory.

McCain/Palin got shellacked. They took a solid drubbing. They were bitch-slapped. They lost resoundingly. It wasn’t even close.

So I don’t know which “counties” you’re looking at. Maybe you need to stand on your head and squint at the electoral map, to see it the way you do.

Also, re: Manchurian… either you’re a troll, or just an idiot.
[/quote]
pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.

64

[quote]jp_dubya wrote:
K2000 wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
the Manchurian got pumped into office with little more than a HUGE anti-Bush movement, which, county by county still looks like a McCain victory.

McCain/Palin got shellacked. They took a solid drubbing. They were bitch-slapped. They lost resoundingly. It wasn’t even close.

So I don’t know which “counties” you’re looking at. Maybe you need to stand on your head and squint at the electoral map, to see it the way you do.

Also, re: Manchurian… either you’re a troll, or just an idiot.

pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.
[/quote]
You’re being a moron, stop it.

65

[quote]jp_dubya wrote:
pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.
[/quote]

Come on now, you can’t be THAT dumb, can you? Can you see Russia from YOUR house, too?

66

His point is valid. so many cities have corrupt democratic administrations for close to 100 years but have still not fixed their problems. Why is that? Let’s check crime rates per capita, welfare, and a few other things per person and see who wins and how they vote.

67

[quote]tom63 wrote:
His point is valid. so many cities have corrupt democratic administrations for close to 100 years but have still not fixed their problems. Why is that? Let’s check crime rates per capita, welfare, and a few other things per person and see who wins and how they vote.[/quote]

Let’s do it for all 57 states while we’re at it. Again, President vs VP candiate.

68

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.

Come on now, you can’t be THAT dumb, can you? Can you see Russia from YOUR house, too?[/quote]

A lie really does get halfway around the world before the truth even gets on its pants:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

You do realize that video footage can be cut and edited to say almost anything, right?

70

[quote]pushharder wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Stronghold wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.

Come on now, you can’t be THAT dumb, can you? Can you see Russia from YOUR house, too?

A lie really does get halfway around the world before the truth even gets on its pants:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

You do realize that video footage can be cut and edited to say almost anything, right?

That’s the second time I’ve read that transcript. ABC News is a despicable organization for fraudulently and conveniently editing that footage precisely to shape a ignorant caricature of Palin.[/quote]

But if there wasn’t a market for the stuff ABC shovels, they wouldn’t keep doing it. I mean, how else did Sarah Palin become a bigger lightning rod for liberal Two Minutes Hates than Bush other than that liberals wanted to hate her? “Damn her beauty! Damn her success! Damn her fertility! Damn her Christianity!” - as if she was ever beating us over the head with any of those things. Lol. The hate went from 0-60 in .8 seconds. It was really amazing to watch.

71

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Stronghold wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.

Come on now, you can’t be THAT dumb, can you? Can you see Russia from YOUR house, too?

A lie really does get halfway around the world before the truth even gets on its pants:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

You do realize that video footage can be cut and edited to say almost anything, right? [/quote]

The accuracy of my snide remark does little to change the fact that you are stupid (or deceptive) enough to try to assert that the surface area controlled by a political party’s supporters somehow implies political victory in a democratic system.

My disgust with Palin has more to do with her rambling, incoherent public appearances and her inability to deal with being the object of the same “attack dog” tactics that she herself was so fond of during the election. She isn’t tough enough to handle someone photoshopping a picture of her and her child (in a commentary that had NOTHING to do with her child), then she isn’t tough enough to handle America’s enemies abroad and the American political press (which is vicious in its own right).

I see Palin as one more step forward down the sad, disintegrating road that the American right has been taking. Idiotic movements like the “birthers”, the “we yell louder so we must be right” tactics of Limbaugh and his cronies, and the selection of a former TV news anchor who needed 6 years to get a bachelor’s degree in journalism for the nation’s second highest office.

72

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Stronghold wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.

Come on now, you can’t be THAT dumb, can you? Can you see Russia from YOUR house, too?

A lie really does get halfway around the world before the truth even gets on its pants:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

You do realize that video footage can be cut and edited to say almost anything, right?

The accuracy of my snide remark does little to change the fact that you are stupid (or deceptive) enough to try to assert that the surface area controlled by a political party’s supporters somehow implies political victory in a democratic system.

My disgust with Palin has more to do with her rambling, incoherent public appearances and her inability to deal with being the object of the same “attack dog” tactics that she herself was so fond of during the election. She isn’t tough enough to handle someone photoshopping a picture of her and her child (in a commentary that had NOTHING to do with her child), then she isn’t tough enough to handle America’s enemies abroad and the American political press (which is vicious in its own right).

I see Palin as one more step forward down the sad, disintegrating road that the American right has been taking. Idiotic movements like the “birthers”, the “we yell louder so we must be right” tactics of Limbaugh and his cronies, and the selection of a former TV news anchor who needed 6 years to get a bachelor’s degree in journalism for the nation’s second highest office.[/quote]

Preach it Brother Strong hold , you did fail to mention quitting an elected office and expecting to be thought well of .

73

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Stronghold wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.

Come on now, you can’t be THAT dumb, can you? Can you see Russia from YOUR house, too?

A lie really does get halfway around the world before the truth even gets on its pants:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

You do realize that video footage can be cut and edited to say almost anything, right?

The accuracy of my snide remark does little to change the fact that you are stupid (or deceptive) enough to try to assert that the surface area controlled by a political party’s supporters somehow implies political victory in a democratic system.
[/quote]

You are stupid enough to assert that I ever asserted that. I never did.

Uh, have you ever heard Biden talk? Have you ever read about his plagiarism (Maureen Dowd uncovered that, btw)? Did you see the press attacking Obama’s or Biden’s kids?

I think these “attack dog” tactics are probably a figment of your own imagination. Can you provide some concrete examples for us (links would be great)?

[quote]
I see Palin as one more step forward down the sad, disintegrating road that the American right has been taking. Idiotic movements like the “birthers”, the “we yell louder so we must be right” tactics of Limbaugh and his cronies, and the selection of a former TV news anchor who needed 6 years to get a bachelor’s degree in journalism for the nation’s second highest office.[/quote]

Yes, Stronghold, only the American political Left - the last stronghold of public virtue - can save us now! Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Emmanuel: it’s all on your capable shoulders.

74

[quote]jp_dubya wrote:
K2000 wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
the Manchurian got pumped into office with little more than a HUGE anti-Bush movement, which, county by county still looks like a McCain victory.

McCain/Palin got shellacked. They took a solid drubbing. They were bitch-slapped. They lost resoundingly. It wasn’t even close.

So I don’t know which “counties” you’re looking at. Maybe you need to stand on your head and squint at the electoral map, to see it the way you do.

Also, re: Manchurian… either you’re a troll, or just an idiot.

pick the prominent color.
Troll? easy noob.
[/quote]

You’re a moron.

Rocks and trees and dirt don’t vote, people do. And it’s not our fault that liberal old NJ has the population of four midwestern states combined, and if you throw us, NY, and Cali in, we can very nearly beat the rest of the country alone.

You fucks are lucky you got Texas.

75

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

You are stupid enough to assert that I ever asserted that. I never did.[/quote]

Oops, you’re right. Let me rephrase:

The accuracy of my snide remark does little to change the fact that jp_dubya stupid (or deceptive) enough to try to assert that the surface area controlled by a political party’s supporters somehow implies political victory in a democratic system.

my bad.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Uh, have you ever heard Biden talk? Have you ever read about his plagiarism (Maureen Dowd uncovered that, btw)? Did you see the press attacking Obama’s or Biden’s kids?

I think these “attack dog” tactics are probably a figment of your own imagination. Can you provide some concrete examples for us (links would be great)? [/quote]

I’m sorry, I thought this thread was about Sarah Palin, who is a fucking idiot. Since when did it become about Biden, who is also a fucking idiot?

I have issues with Biden too, but that was a nice attempt a strawman.

Figment of my imagination? Have you already forgotten Palin’s inflammatory public appearances that had her own campaign doing damage control and trying to keep the idiots from attempting physical violence against members of the opposing campaign?

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Yes, Stronghold, only the American political Left - the last stronghold of public virtue - can save us now! Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Emmanuel: it’s all on your capable shoulders. [/quote]

Find where I said anything of the sort. Please stop putting words in my mouth. All I said is that I think Palin is an idiot. Of course, since I don’t agree with everything you believe, then I must be one of those evil homosocialist commie atheist bastards!

I will say this though, if you think that the Republican party stands for small government, then you haven’t been paying attention.

76

I figured that since you were so concerned about a moron becoming 2nd in command, you’d be equally horrified that a moron ACTUALLY IS 2nd in command. Since you’re not, one wonders why you care about Palin, who can’t even run for office until 2012.

So, the thought of a moron running for office scares you, but the thought of a moron IN OFFICE doesn’t. Got it.

Well, it should be easy for you to back up your claims with hard evidence. When liberals use the word “inflammatory”, I know I need to push for a bit more information, which you should have no problem providing.

Actually, you said this

So you’ve got something for everyone here: the American right, Limbaugh, the “birthers” (lolwut?). All I’m doing is pointing out some rather glaring double standards.

77

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Actually, you said this

I see Palin as one more step forward down the sad, disintegrating road that the American right has been taking. Idiotic movements like the “birthers”, the “we yell louder so we must be right” tactics of Limbaugh and his cronies, and the selection of a former TV news anchor who needed 6 years to get a bachelor’s degree in journalism for the nation’s second highest office.

So you’ve got something for everyone here: the American right, Limbaugh, the “birthers” (lolwut?). All I’m doing is pointing out some rather glaring double standards.[/quote]

I like small government. I do not like the Republican party or those representing it. I do not believe that the Republican party stands for small government any more, ESPECIALLY the contingent that is ravenously supportive of Sarah Palin. Is that difficult to understand or are you one of those idiots who refuses to acknowledge that someone can have a political position NOT aligned with one half of the two-party system?

Palin is an idiot.
Limbaugh never won an argument without simply being the bigger asshole.
The “birthers” are a bunch of paranoid conspiracy wingnuts who refuse to accept hard evidence of Obama’s natural status in favor of wildly impossible scenarios. Ironically, many of these same people will take a single piece of literature and use it as proof of the existence of an immortal, omnipotent sky-being.

I can’t do anything about Biden being the VP for the next four years. I didn’t vote for him. I am, however, disturbed by the seemingly large number of people who think that “Dear Sarah” is the right (wo)man for the job in 2012.

My comments about Palin’s attack dog role in the 2008 election was for the sole purpose of pointing out the double standard involved. When she tells her supporters that Obama is a terrorist and unamerican, its politics. When she uses her own children for political leverage and sends her pregnant teenage daughter on an abstinence campaign (let’s ignore that prior to the publicity machine getting ahold of her, Bristol told Fox News that abstinence wasn’t a realistic solution), it’s because she is a good mom. But, when a comedian photoshops a picture of Palin that happens to include one of her children, then she is being exploited and attacked in a perverse manner, right? Never mind that no one outside of Alaska had seen that image until Palin released a statement including it to the press.

79

Sarah can not handle bare knuckles

80

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090808/ap_on_re_us/us_palin_health_care