[quote]orion wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Sarah can’t name her favorite magazine (I don’t read them and neither does she) but Obama says, without knowing the facts, that the police acted ‘stupidly’…while trying to promote his healthcare bill. “Yeah, Barack, the country will ignore that and follow you on the healthcare stuff. Yeah.”
Her approval rating in Alaska was 54% on leaving. Yet the brilliant Harvard Law grad and governor of Massachusetts is at 31% and has turned his state into a disaster area. “But Sarah only graduated from the University of Idaho, so she’s an idiot!”
Libs have an IQ less than room temperature…in a meat locker. Jesus…
Have you listened to her press conference?
Could you actually follow her ramblings?
[/quote]
Have you ever heard Obama without a teleprompter? 57 states? But of course the libs will say the rigors of the campaign trail, while Palin is an idiot.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Sarah Palin is an idiot because Sarah Palin is hot, and most female journalism revolves around making the female journalist appear hotter. There are not many female journalists more attractive than Sarah Palin, female journalists know it, and so Sarah Palin is an “idiot.” The other issue is Sarah Palin has a loving husband and is fertile. Liberal female journalists tend to have 0-1.5 children as they approach the age of 40 after a divorce or two. Have you noticed that almost all of Tina Fey’s “comedy” revolves around her barrenness and her inability to pin down a man whilst keeping her career going? Isn’t this her story in real life (oh, sorry, she has her child now)? Wasn’t Fey one of Palin’s biggest mockers during the campaign?
In reality, Palin commits far fewer verbal gaffes than our Vice President, who (hopefully) is being kept on a short leash by David Axelrod and the President.
Male journalists go along with what the female journalists say in hopes that it will endear them to the female journalists and get them laid. [/quote]
Sometimes your posts make sense and employ good logical reasoning. This is not one of those times…
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Sarah Palin is an idiot because Sarah Palin is hot, and most female journalism revolves around making the female journalist appear hotter. There are not many female journalists more attractive than Sarah Palin, female journalists know it, and so Sarah Palin is an “idiot.” The other issue is Sarah Palin has a loving husband and is fertile. Liberal female journalists tend to have 0-1.5 children as they approach the age of 40 after a divorce or two. Have you noticed that almost all of Tina Fey’s “comedy” revolves around her barrenness and her inability to pin down a man whilst keeping her career going? Isn’t this her story in real life (oh, sorry, she has her child now)? Wasn’t Fey one of Palin’s biggest mockers during the campaign?
In reality, Palin commits far fewer verbal gaffes than our Vice President, who (hopefully) is being kept on a short leash by David Axelrod and the President.
Male journalists go along with what the female journalists say in hopes that it will endear them to the female journalists and get them laid.
Sometimes your posts make sense and employ good logical reasoning. This is not one of those times…[/quote]
Uh, read Fey’s bio and then get back to me on that one.
I’m just employing Sailer’s Law of Female Journalism:
Maureen Dowd’s career is perhaps the most glaring example of Sailer’s Law. She, too, obsesses over Palin and is quite a bit less attractive and fertile (and also can’t seem to pin down a man):
Here, the effort revolves around Dowd demonstrating that she is more intelligent - and thus, more desirable - than Palin. No bio I’ve read of her mentions a husband and or children, which probably explains her man-hating tome, “Are Men Necessary?” http://www.biography.com/articles/Maureen-Dowd-278915
Palin’s not an idiot, but she’s not somebody who should be running America. I’m sure she is a great Mom, good businesswoman, fun person to hang around with, interesting person to talk to. But she’s not qualified to lead the nation IMO. Likeability as a person doesn’t trump her weak background on national and international issues.
Like it mattered for Obama? First term senator with no foreign policy experience? Come on, if she was a liberal she would be intelligent and vivacious. Hell, she would be intelligent and vivacious if she was an identical twin of Bella Abzug.
And yes that beast was called beautiful by what I term the liberal media. She had a face that looked like 80 miles of rough trail. Andrew Wilkow did a bit about this on Sirius radio. If you’re liberal and say and do this you’re…, but if you’re conservative…
I think he calls it his dictionary of liberal thinking or something similar.
Well, of course the liberals dogged on Palin, I agree. She’s beautiful, and if you’ve looked at the difference between the Fox side of the media and the CNN side of the media. Republican chicks win hands down! Republicans are hot enough they are not jealous, have their own stuff to worry about. Democrats on the other hand need everyone to agree with them and believe that they are beautiful, even when they are not. At least the Republicans can chose their dirty dirty whore newscasters (that I fantasize about) better than the democrats.
[quote]K2000 wrote:
Palin’s not an idiot, but she’s not somebody who should be running America. I’m sure she is a great Mom, good businesswoman, fun person to hang around with, interesting person to talk to. But she’s not qualified to lead the nation IMO. Likeability as a person doesn’t trump her weak background on national and international issues.
[/quote]
Yeah, all those Harvard and Yale lawyers, way smarter than Sarah, have done such a magnificent job! Let’s continue letting them run things!
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Sarah Palin is an idiot because Sarah Palin is hot, and most female journalism revolves around making the female journalist appear hotter. There are not many female journalists more attractive than Sarah Palin, female journalists know it, and so Sarah Palin is an “idiot.” The other issue is Sarah Palin has a loving husband and is fertile. Liberal female journalists tend to have 0-1.5 children as they approach the age of 40 after a divorce or two. Have you noticed that almost all of Tina Fey’s “comedy” revolves around her barrenness and her inability to pin down a man whilst keeping her career going? Isn’t this her story in real life (oh, sorry, she has her child now)? Wasn’t Fey one of Palin’s biggest mockers during the campaign?
In reality, Palin commits far fewer verbal gaffes than our Vice President, who (hopefully) is being kept on a short leash by David Axelrod and the President.
Male journalists go along with what the female journalists say in hopes that it will endear them to the female journalists and get them laid. [/quote]
LOL! This is perfect. PR at his finest.
Irish, this is the shit I’m talking about here. Where the hell else could I go to “learn” about this stuff?
Sarah Palin could look like Madeline Albright and the liberal media and her detractors would think and say EXACTLY the same things about her. There is NOTHING, ZERO, NADA, ZILCH to suggest otherwise.
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Sarah Palin is an idiot because Sarah Palin is hot, and most female journalism revolves around making the female journalist appear hotter. There are not many female journalists more attractive than Sarah Palin, female journalists know it, and so Sarah Palin is an “idiot.” The other issue is Sarah Palin has a loving husband and is fertile. Liberal female journalists tend to have 0-1.5 children as they approach the age of 40 after a divorce or two. Have you noticed that almost all of Tina Fey’s “comedy” revolves around her barrenness and her inability to pin down a man whilst keeping her career going? Isn’t this her story in real life (oh, sorry, she has her child now)? Wasn’t Fey one of Palin’s biggest mockers during the campaign?
In reality, Palin commits far fewer verbal gaffes than our Vice President, who (hopefully) is being kept on a short leash by David Axelrod and the President.
Male journalists go along with what the female journalists say in hopes that it will endear them to the female journalists and get them laid.
LOL! This is perfect. PR at his finest.
Irish, this is the shit I’m talking about here. Where the hell else could I go to “learn” about this stuff?
PR, don’t EVER stop posting again.[/quote]
hahahhah. I see your point now. That shit takes EFFORT to come up with.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Well, of course the liberals dogged on Palin, I agree. She’s beautiful, and if you’ve looked at the difference between the Fox side of the media and the CNN side of the media. Republican chicks win hands down! Republicans are hot enough they are not jealous, have their own stuff to worry about. Democrats on the other hand need everyone to agree with them and believe that they are beautiful, even when they are not. At least the Republicans can chose their dirty dirty whore newscasters (that I fantasize about) better than the democrats.
the Manchurian got pumped into office with little more than a HUGE anti-Bush movement, which, county by county still looks like a McCain victory.
The irony of these over book educated and under street smarts self promoters…isn’t their campaign of ‘time for change’ as nearly as ironic as my mother calling me a son of a bitch?
[quote]tom63 wrote:
Like it mattered for Obama? [/quote]
Obama can speak intelligently on national and international issues. Sarah Palin - not so much. She couldn’t even come off as smart when speaking about herself (the Katie Couric interview). Oh yes, that vicious vicious Katie Couric LOL. If you can’t handle Katie Couric, how well will you perform when you need to meet with Putin? Anybody who thinks Katie Couric is tough is a pussy.
Obama went through 10 or 12 televised Democratic debates, where he had to speak off the cuff on the issues, plenty of time to evaluate his intelligence and depth. Palin had one debate, and half her answers were “you betcha” or general attacks on liberals, or winks. She didn’t display a command on the issues, IMO.
But I like Sarah Palin because I don’t think she can win a national election, so I hope she stays around forever. Don’t let me persuade you that she’s not totally awesome.
The last one about the guy in the wheel chair had to be embarrassing; the one about Indians at seven eleven and Dunkin Donuts was politically incorrect, but amusing. All the rest were sound bites a few seconds of a conversation that could have been just people joking around. I think the best one of these I saw was about bush. I will see if I can find it
[quote]K2000 wrote:
tom63 wrote:
Like it mattered for Obama?
Obama can speak intelligently on national and international issues. Sarah Palin - not so much. She couldn’t even come off as smart when speaking about herself (the Katie Couric interview). Oh yes, that vicious vicious Katie Couric LOL. If you can’t handle Katie Couric, how well will you perform when you need to meet with Putin? Anybody who thinks Katie Couric is tough is a pussy.
Obama went through 10 or 12 televised Democratic debates, where he had to speak off the cuff on the issues, plenty of time to evaluate his intelligence and depth. Palin had one debate, and half her answers were “you betcha” or general attacks on liberals, or winks. She didn’t display a command on the issues, IMO.
But I like Sarah Palin because I don’t think she can win a national election, so I hope she stays around forever. Don’t let me persuade you that she’s not totally awesome.
[/quote]
