[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
You religious people scare the shit out of me. How you think you can draw so many conclusions as fact from the scrawlings of some tripped out dudes on mushrooms over 2000 years ago is beyond me. What the fuck happened to logic and reason?[/quote]
The Gospels are some of the best historical documents the world holds, hell we hold what is written about Alexander the Great as fact, even though it wasn’t written until 400 years after his death. Same goes for Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, &c.
[quote]
I heard that santa claus was actually the second messiah. You know how I know that? I found a book that was written by these dudes who said they actually met the second messiah. He even had a beard and a red suit. They wrote it down in a book so I know its true.[/quote]
Actually, Santa Claus is based off of Saint Nickolaus who was a Bishop that happened to bunch Arius in the mouth, as well as, put gold coins in the shoes of children on the night before Jesus birthday.
See the difference is that Catholics know their history.[/quote]
- We hold what we know about Alexander as fact because Arrian had access to both the official Macedonian records and the diaries of Ptolemy. We also have numerous other sources, eg Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, Diodorus Siculus, Justinus etc.
Virtually the entire inhabited world also experienced and recorded his invasions. Unfortuntately Thebes and Tyre(which is no longer an island due to Alexander’s mole) weren’t able to record his visits.[/quote]
400 years after he died. And the first copy of that we have is about a hundred years after if I remember correctly.
[quote]
2. Socrates never wrote anything.
- Plato and Aristotle were philosophers not historians.[/quote]
Never said Socrates wrote anything or that Plato and Aristotle were historians, I said we accept far less stringent academic standards when it comes to accepting facts about these men than what people attempt to put on the Gospels and Jesus. Four accounts of one man written between 4-50 years after his death. Pretty damn good evidence, I’d say. If you think it’s loose standards, then you need to go back to school and study some more history.[/quote]
Correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t these accounts contradictory and written by the most ardent followers of his personality cult? Also, didn’t Arrian describe PLAUSIBLE events like battles/campaigns that actually took place as opposed to magic water/wine tricks, levitation and rising from the dead? In addition, isn’t the fact that Alexander conquered virtually the entire inhabited world before he was 30 corroborating evidence of some sort perhaps?
I’m all for believing in crap if it makes for a more cohesive society and a shared set of values/morals/standards of behaviour etc, but must we compare serious scholarship with religion?