I once drop kicked a mf’er about halfway across the internet.
My skill are tremendous.
I’m not sure this is correct. “Crime of passion” can reduce murder to manslaughter.
What type of bullshit is that? Why are the laws coddling the rapist?
The fact it has crime in the name should tell us something.
You might want to look the facts of the case he’s talking about first before making this assumption. I’ve not heard of it.
Because NC is backwards in every other way possible, why not with rapists too.
And please fact check it. For the love of anything remotely sane, I hope it has changed. But as of March of this year, thems was the rules.
Which case was this? Can you post a link please?
Alright gents, there I am, parachuting across state lines, as one is wont to do.
Suddenly, I am besieged by a rapscallion ALSO parachuting across state lines. He draws upon me his flintlock pistol and fires. Due to the smoothbore nature of the weapon, he completely misses.
NOW, I observe that he is reloading, which signals to me intent to do harm again. I quickly draw my blade and SEVER his parachute from his body.
I have sent him into free-fall, HOWEVER, I have also AIDED him in his escape from me, as I was now the one armed with a blade while he was in the midst of reloading.
Which one is the REAL criminal?
The pavement.
I just made an Arnold reference in reply to a Point Break reference? LOL.
I don’t remember much of Point Break. Watched it like 20 years ago.
This isn’t a specific case, but the literature in NC apparently.
The only reason I know is through our CC class. The woman who taught the class went through dozens of scenarios on when it’s considered excessive force, escalating violence, or otherwise inappropriate times to use a firearm. She was quite bothered by the law, but it’s her job to teach it, not debate it. Basically I know the general breakdown is:
-
Someone’s life has to be in clear and present danger, without dispute. Ie. Someone already has a weapon, with clear intent to use it. Or otherwise has evidence against them that they are trying to kill you. Not harm. But kill. If they’re threatening to fight you, no gun. If they’re raping someone, no gun. There has to be reason to believe they were trying to kill.
-
You cannot escalate a situation. The example being, some guy smacking your girlfriends ass, you threatening to beat the shit out of him, he Pulls a knife, you shoot him, you’re at fault. You can make a valid attempt to DE escalate the situation, and if they refuse, then you’re within your rights yet again.
I’m not sure how these actually hold up in court, I have a hard time believing a judge would throw someone in jail for stopping a rape, lethally or not, but those are apparently the circumstances.
Can I ask you, how do you juggle empathy for victims of assaults that are incapable of defending themselves, and the idea that women, who are physically inferior and at the mercy of most able-bodied men, have too much power and are overtaking men in the workplace and in society as a whole?
You for making that post.
I think you should speak to an actual attorney.
And I don’t get that second example. Did the man who just committed assault on your gf simply display the knife or did he attempt to stab you before you shot him? It seems like the other guy was the one who escalated things.
Gravity. But you are an accomplice. As is the other guy who was drawn by gravity violently into the ground.
But I simply helped him escape.
Forever.
Then you wouldn’t have anything to worry about.
What is “CC class”? I apologize, I’m not from the US.
Concealed Carry. In some states, you take a course to learn the laws regarding carrying a concealed firearm before you are granted a permit.