For centuries the Romans were the best damn Bocce players in Teh World. Now, sadly, they suck. Why is that? Is there something about Romans that make them inferior Bocce players?
You’d think the Sicilians would be the best Bocce players, but noooooooooooo…the damn Nepalese have held the world title for the past 15 years.
What gives!!?!?
Where have heard such nonsense?
They’re too busy conquering the world to succeed at your silly little lawn game.
I played that shit for a year. I’m not kidding.
Let’s just say - it’s boring as fuck, average years of age are >40 and you have to practice it constantly.
But the grub was first class (after every match). Beer included.
[quote]matko5 wrote:
I played that shit for a year. I’m not kidding.
Let’s just say - it’s boring as fuck, average years of age are >40 and you have to practice it constantly.
But the grub was first class (after every match). Beer included.[/quote]
You are not playing it correctly. The game is not meant to be fun, until the drinking starts. Let’s see how good you roll the ball when you have thrown a few back. We have one rule, don’t spill the liqueur, it will kill the grass. When I play, we have cops come by and grub down with us, it’s a cool experience.
They’re getting too tall. Several generations of better nutrition and not finishin a da concrete ora butterin da bricks has taken them out of contention for championship bocce.
Aborigine would rule that sport if they wanted to.