Yes, so can killing thousands of terrorists. One can say that about any action taken by the US. Therefore, it has not merit.
Honor is not lost when we detain the families of terrorists in order to gain information. If you don’t know that much I’m dumfounded.
Maybe, more lives are saved. Your argument has no merit as one can say that about any action taken by the US against Muslim extremists.
More pure bullshit flowing from your screen. I quoted him verbatim. I connected the dots as he has been light attacking Clinton. You called me dishonest and now you can’t back it up.
Why am I not surprised?
Ya, except the families of terrorists didn’t actually do anything to us. Lets just throw them in Gitmo! That’s teach them about freedom, Murica!
There’s no honor lost in detaining people for no other reason than they’re related to a terrorist? Interesting…
So if you kill someone and the police “detain” your whole family to get information about you that’s just peachy with you?
Ya, maybe. That’s different than, “if we do then we save lives,” isn’t it?
Complete non-sense.
Clown show, per usual.
TB: [quote=“thunderbolt23, post:575, topic:217419”]
Hillary getting elected might just make things better medium and long term as you note, it’d make sense to pull the lever for Hillary as a contrarian but strategic vote to put things in motion for a better 2018 and beyond.
[/quote]
What is he referring to:
Zeb:
Because, wait for it, it would be better for right leaning individuals/Republicans/conservatives in the medium to long term. Try and use your brain for 5 fucking seconds.
This is the best part, though.
TB: I won’t vote for her.
zeb1: You’re a liar.
What a piece of shit you are.
For the Republican party. You complete misrepresent what TB wrote. Good lord, get the fuck out of here. This type of bullshit might work on the Pitts of the world, but everyone can see through your blatant non-sense.
Now run along lying Zeb.
1 Like
Being surprised requires brain cells.
1 Like
LOL…blatant nonsense that happens to be fact that you cannot disprove so we go back and forth. Each time you name call and each time I politely ask you to point out where I was dishonest. Yet…you can’t seem to do it.
You have not pointed out in the least your claim of me being dishonest.
But you have named called which is usually where you take a debate that you have no other answer for.
One more time:
-
I claimed he did not attack Hillary even close to as much as Trump. And you did not refute it and it cannot be refuted as it is a fact.
-
He claimed that Hillary would be good in the “medium and long term”. You cannot refute once again it is a fact, a direct quote verbatim.
So where is the dishonesty?
Answer: There is none.
Your response more name calling- ha
More ad Hominem attacks. But, no answer as to your false accusations.
And again…no substance
Use your brain.
4 years of Hillary gives us…in your own language “wait for it”
-
2 or more left wing Supreme Court Judges
-
Higher taxes
-
More debt
-
Threatens the 2nd amendment
THINK don’t just follow blindly…as you have been trained to do.
The man gives us strategic reasons to vote for Hillary. He attacks Trump regularly. I then as anyone might believe that he would support Hillary.
And you jump in muster up all of your intellectual capacity and …name call!
Hahahahaah
You have nothing Kid–Read it N O T H I N G
Try again?
Are you fucking retarded? That’s rhetorical.
I claimed you twisted the post, derp…
Then I claimed you were being dishonest after you claimed you hadn’t wronged him.
Then I post why quoting everyone from beans to TB to me to you. I connected the dots for you.
Answered above…
No what TB was addressing. This is another example of your dishonesty.
Ya, medium and long term reasons that end in Republican’s controlling two branches…
He’s garbage.
So you’re calling him a liar. That makes you a piece of shit, imo.
Fucking clown show.
1 Like
Are you?
I am arguing facts and you continue to name call. Not exactly a good retort unless you’re in High School.
More name calling and yet…no response.
You “CLAIMED” I twisted the post. When challenged as to how this happened and given a real set of facts you huffed and you puffed and you…CALLED ME MORE NAMES.
Glad you posted it again for all to read.
Now point out where I misquoted him.
And when you can’t please resort to name calling.
He was not addressing? NO SHIT!
I was addressing it as that is what happens when we have 4 years of Hillary.
He was claiming it might be good for the party in four years. Maybe…maybe not. But as I already schooled you 4 years of Hillary gives us a nightmare. See my four points there are more.
WOW…that is not AT ALL the point. Try to stay focused.
Here this may help:
-
We all know he attacks Trump regularly
-
I challenged him on why he does not attack Hillary in a similar fashion
-
Suddenly the post that we have both now quoted pops up. In it is a well thought out explanation as to why it might be a good idea to elect Hillary this time around.
Are you with me yet?
Yeah…Trump is garbage LOL …but do try to keep up
Oh look at you being dishonest, yet again. Trying reading that whole post. I know it’s a long, you can do it.
More insults and still no answers as to why I am dishonest.
So once again you just don’t have any answers and you are growing frustrated and angry hence the name calling.
Classic Internet behavior.
Bar room talk from USMCCDS423
“you calling me a liar?”
LOL…
Okay back to our game:
He put forth a well reasoned argument for electing Hillary for four years. On top of that he has attacked Trump repeatedly and left Hillary pretty much alone.
One can draw any conclusion that they like. I have drawn mine.
I love that line though say it again will you?
“YOU’RE CALLIN HIM A LIAR”
Grrrrr…
LOL