[quote]ZEB wrote:
I wonder who really cares? She has no chance of beating Obama and only a tad better chance of actually getting the nomination. Did you take a look at her negative poll numbers? The press has done such a number on her (and granted she’s not helped herself on occasion) that she really has no chance.[/quote]
I don’t disagree, Zeb…
But it seems to me that there has to be three basic reasons why her name keeps coming up:
SOMEBODY; either in the GOP; the Tea Party Wing of the GOP; or “Grass Roots” conservatives are “pushing” her to run.
She has a ego bigger than Donald Trump OR
All of the above.
Something is keeping her from making a clear announcement as to whether she will run or not.
She has gone on the record as saying that she will run if “America Needs her”.
Try and pull up American Republic, I do understand your point , but in America we call our selves a Democracy.
If absolutely necessary I will read your article and section , but I believe we are back to being a democracy and if the Majority of Americans would want a Government Run Health care system are you telling me the Constitution would forbid this [/quote]
You’re going to come to PWI have never read the Constitution? That’s the problem. Idiots like you don’t understand the difference between a democracy and a republic, so you think we can just vote in whatever policy the majority approves of. The law be damned.[/quote]
I read the constitution , just recently as a matter of fact. But I must admit I did not memorize it.
I found the constitution placed limitations on what Government could do , I did not see that it could thwart the will of the people , I asked if the people wanted public health care , where does the constitution forbid it ?
[/quote]
Tenth Amendment.[/quote]
The way I read it , is that it is all about state rights , how far are you going back to right all the wrongs , while you are correct in a technical sense you are incorrect de facto[/quote]
What is this buffonery, the federal government has enumerated powers.
Either show me the public health care clause or at least post tits.
[/quote]
I would not think I would have to explain de facto to you, The Federal Gov. has been over stepping
it’s powers all my life , but for some reason now it can no longer.
Please explain this buffonery to me :)[/quote]
So you’ve been screwing your sister for the last ten years, should you now stop or just keep on banging? Ater all, that’s the way it’s been for the last decade…[/quote]
If you feel like a conversation let me know , I am not wasting energy on posts like this
And I don’t have a sister and I was banging your mother :)[/quote]
LOL. Good one. Except you don’t see the analogy. The gov’t been doing something illegal and morally reprehensible for decades. Why stop now? Except that it’s the legal and moral thing to do. [/quote]
That’s better, old habits die hard, it is called presidence
I agree that it would be good to go back to the original intent, but I believe the 10th amendment is being used selectively,
[quote]ZEB wrote:
I wonder who really cares? She has no chance of beating Obama and only a tad better chance of actually getting the nomination. Did you take a look at her negative poll numbers? The press has done such a number on her (and granted she’s not helped herself on occasion) that she really has no chance.[/quote]
I don’t disagree, Zeb…
But it seems to me that there has to be three basic reasons why her name keeps coming up:
SOMEBODY; either in the GOP; the Tea Party Wing of the GOP; or “Grass Roots” conservatives are “pushing” her to run.
She has a ego bigger than Donald Trump OR
All of the above.
Something is keeping her from making a clear announcement as to whether she will run or not.
She has gone on the record as saying that she will run if “America Needs her”.
Mufasa[/quote]
She will be our modern day ‘Cincinnatus’, much in the vein as how President Washington thought of himself as Cincinnatus – leaving the plow and saving the Republic. While I like Bachman slightly more, I think Palin, with her strong Christian values and selfless dedication to this great nation, will come in after the Great Collapse and save the nation.
The era of the lawyer scum, like the whacko criminal hippies pictured above and Obama, will end.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
ZEB wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pushharder wrote:
There are some liberals in here who are absolutely fuckin brilliant.
Fortunately most of them seem to be from other country’s so I still have hope.
countries[/quote]
Thank you for the correction. Rest assured I will do the same for you in the near future.
[/quote]
Are you removing the quote tags on purpose?[/quote]
You’ve given up trying to face me on the issues and are now resorting to this nonsense? Look, I never had a high regard for your political acumen, but this stuff just makes you look petty.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
I wonder who really cares? She has no chance of beating Obama and only a tad better chance of actually getting the nomination. Did you take a look at her negative poll numbers? The press has done such a number on her (and granted she’s not helped herself on occasion) that she really has no chance.[/quote]
I don’t disagree, Zeb…
But it seems to me that there has to be three basic reasons why her name keeps coming up:
SOMEBODY; either in the GOP; the Tea Party Wing of the GOP; or “Grass Roots” conservatives are “pushing” her to run.
She has a ego bigger than Donald Trump OR
All of the above.
Something is keeping her from making a clear announcement as to whether she will run or not.
She has gone on the record as saying that she will run if “America Needs her”.
Mufasa[/quote]
I think she’s a great conservative crowd pleaser and in that role can be an asset to the republican party. But she should stop nursing this fantasy that one day she will become President it’s not going to happen.
Oh, and no one has an ego larger than Donald Trump, not even Obama and he’s got a pretty large one.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
ZEB wrote:
ZEB wrote:
pushharder wrote:
There are some liberals in here who are absolutely fuckin brilliant.
Fortunately most of them seem to be from other country’s so I still have hope.
countries[/quote]
Thank you for the correction. Rest assured I will do the same for you in the near future.
[/quote]
Are you removing the quote tags on purpose?[/quote]
You’ve given up trying to face me on the issues and are now resorting to this nonsense? Look, I never had a high regard for your political acumen, but this stuff just makes you look petty.
[/quote]
Speaking of lawyer scum HH, Michelle Bachman was a lawyer…
Though it is off topic, the healthcare bill to ME is unconstitutional,
however I would say a great deal of what is considered unconstitutional is a result of Hamiltonian interpretations of the Necessary and Proper clause, as well as the Interstate Commerce clause. Though perhaps someone more enlightened than myself can digress upon those two parts of the constitution. Supreme court rulings have tended to favor this.
[quote]666Rich wrote:
Speaking of lawyer scum HH, Michelle Bachman was a lawyer…
Though it is off topic, the healthcare bill to ME is unconstitutional,
however I would say a great deal of what is considered unconstitutional is a result of Hamiltonian interpretations of the Necessary and Proper clause, as well as the Interstate Commerce clause. Though perhaps someone more enlightened than myself can digress upon those two parts of the constitution. Supreme court rulings have tended to favor this.
[/quote]
The SC interpreted the Necessary and Proper clause rather narrowly until US vs. Butler in 1936. Then when Roosevelt proposed his Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, the Supreme Court gave up it’s inpependance. We’ve been going down the crapper ever since.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
I wonder who really cares? She has no chance of beating Obama and only a tad better chance of actually getting the nomination. Did you take a look at her negative poll numbers? The press has done such a number on her (and granted she’s not helped herself on occasion) that she really has no chance.[/quote]
I don’t disagree, Zeb…
But it seems to me that there has to be three basic reasons why her name keeps coming up:
SOMEBODY; either in the GOP; the Tea Party Wing of the GOP; or “Grass Roots” conservatives are “pushing” her to run.
She has a ego bigger than Donald Trump OR
All of the above.
Something is keeping her from making a clear announcement as to whether she will run or not.
She has gone on the record as saying that she will run if “America Needs her”.
Mufasa[/quote]
She will be our modern day ‘Cincinnatus’, much in the vein as how President Washington thought of himself as Cincinnatus – leaving the plow and saving the Republic. While I like Bachman slightly more, I think Palin, with her strong Christian values and selfless dedication to this great nation, will come in after the Great Collapse and save the nation.
The era of the lawyer scum, like the whacko criminal hippies pictured above and Obama, will end.
[/quote]
[quote]666Rich wrote:
Speaking of lawyer scum HH, Michelle Bachman was a lawyer…
Though it is off topic, the healthcare bill to ME is unconstitutional,
however I would say a great deal of what is considered unconstitutional is a result of Hamiltonian interpretations of the Necessary and Proper clause, as well as the Interstate Commerce clause. Though perhaps someone more enlightened than myself can digress upon those two parts of the constitution. Supreme court rulings have tended to favor this.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
With Rick Perry seemingly about to jump in I was wondering if any Texans could tell me why I should or shouldn’t consider him.[/quote]
Just moved from Texas.
Policy wise he’s good. He’s just squirrelly and too slick.
