Where's Batman?

[UtahLama]

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Agree with all of this. Totally.

But if we are to demand change from C-Dog…which we should.

Opposite trolls like BlackNinja should also be held to the same exact standard…but they rarely are.
[/quote]

I don’t even know who that is. We have a liberal troll? This is a very right-center board traditionally and that’s why I don’t always know why C-Dog chooses here to race rant. I would COMPLETELY expect the same standard if someone was opposite of him. [/quote]

She/He trolls the other boards on here, but many rally to her/his cause when it screams it’s all “whiteys” fault.

It’s easier(more politically correct) to be racist towards whites than others in this day and age.[/quote]

Just read one of the Tryvon Martin threads. [/quote]

Perfect example.

H Factor read a few pages of that thread, it will make C-Dog look like Mother Teresa.[/quote]

Yuck. Honestly I’d rather not. I don’t like it when the shoe is on either foot. It isn’t all whiteys fault anymore than black people. Stupid debates probably. I really don’t post much except for on PWI and I don’t read any of the other forums except for the training related ones.

I know and have encountered people like that though and they are just as annoying as C-Dog. [/quote]

Yep, its disgusting either way.

[H_factor]

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Agree with all of this. Totally.

But if we are to demand change from C-Dog…which we should.

Opposite trolls like BlackNinja should also be held to the same exact standard…but they rarely are.
[/quote]

I don’t even know who that is. We have a liberal troll? This is a very right-center board traditionally and that’s why I don’t always know why C-Dog chooses here to race rant. I would COMPLETELY expect the same standard if someone was opposite of him. [/quote]

She/He trolls the other boards on here, but many rally to her/his cause when it screams it’s all “whiteys” fault.

It’s easier(more politically correct) to be racist towards whites than others in this day and age.[/quote]

Just read one of the Tryvon Martin threads. [/quote]

Perfect example.

H Factor read a few pages of that thread, it will make C-Dog look like Mother Teresa.[/quote]

Yuck. Honestly I’d rather not. I don’t like it when the shoe is on either foot. It isn’t all whiteys fault anymore than black people. Stupid debates probably. I really don’t post much except for on PWI and I don’t read any of the other forums except for the training related ones.

I know and have encountered people like that though and they are just as annoying as C-Dog. [/quote]

Yep, its disgusting either way.
[/quote]

You will also see those people NEVER search for solutions. Even if they can acknowledge a problem they are so busy screaming about it to do anything to help it. If C-Dog could stop saying liberals and liberal media and would donate some of his time or money to helping at risk kids maybe the things he says are so horrible would happen less.

I’m going to take a wild guess he hasn’t spent much time with black kindergartners without a father and tried to be a positive role model for them. Too busy worrying about the liberal media to make the world any better. I respect people who search for solutions and do things about problems. I wish I did it more. It’s certainly a 2014 goal of mine.

[zecarlo]

Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t.

[UtahLama]

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. [/quote]

I’m curious why you think this Z…you reference it often, but I must be missing something?

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof.

[conservativedog]

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof. [/quote]

yeah i’m on board with that too. let’s see your proof zecarlo.

[conservativedog]

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Hate crime statistics are not accurate, because black on white crime is almost never classified as a “hate” crime.
[/quote]

utah gets it. and so do the silent majority who don’t want to get pissed on in a shitstorm of trolling and slander.

whites are charged with 56 percent of the hate crimes yet african americans disproportionately commit violent crimes not only against white people but against each other as well.

95% or more of carjackings, knockout games, flash mobs looting stores, and 100 plus person black mob fights are committed by african americans.

EXAMPLE - local police refused to classify beatings and harassment of white attendees by blacks at the Iowa State Fair a few years back as “hate crimes” even though the actions were a part of what allegedly had been called “Beat Whitey”"night by those involved.

EXAMPLE - blacks also commit the largest share of hate crime HOAXES. Duke Lacrosse Team Raping a black stripper and beating her was a HOAX. Tawana Brawley/Al Sharpton Rape Accusation = HOAX

most people understand that hate crime legislation creates “thought crime,” which has no place in American law. hate crime status gives some crime victim cases more priority than others.

hate crime status violates the concept of equal protection under the law. brings hate crime politics into the schools.

also the fbi statistics don’t appear to separately categorize latinos, it’s likely that the “white” statistics includes latinos. this is an ongoing problem with the fbi sometimes classifying latinos by victim category, but not by perp category.

whites are so wound up emotionally and are distracted with political correctness. it’s like a veil over their eyes that prevents them from understanding what is coming in the near future.

[smh_23]

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Hate crime statistics are not accurate, because black on white crime is almost never classified as a “hate” crime.
[/quote]

utah gets it.

[/quote]

Then: Where can accurate data be found? Do you have them? Do they prove that more blacks commit racially-motivated crime than whites? By how much?

I assume that you have hard numbers here, since you seem to use the issue as the very foundation of your political self. Where is the hard, accurate data? Where is the proof that what you’re so concerned about is worth being so concerned about? Youtube videos and anecdotes will be summarily ignored: They are useless, and it would do you much good to become aware of that. Show me the proof that says that FBI stats are inaccurate. Show me incidences of black hate crime that went unreported–and I mean hundreds, thousands of them. Show me something real: How many black-on-white hate crimes were there in in the most recent year for which data are available? How many white-on-black? You must know the answers to these questions. You spend all of your time thinking about this shit. You MUST know the answers. So, give them to me, or more on to another topic, one about which you know the basic facts.

[zecarlo]

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. [/quote]

I’m curious why you think this Z…you reference it often, but I must be missing something?

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof.[/quote]
Because he would post the kind of porn that wasn’t kiddie porn but was supposed to sort of look like it. I assume the “women” were over 18 but they looked like minors. They had the bodies of young boys: no curves, no ass, no chest. I did not find it appealing and now, after having read how he stalks his neighbor’s daughter, I really wonder about what sort of weirdo he is. It doesn’t help that he makes constant genital and masturbation references or that he posts about jelqing. That photo he just posted above doesn’t help either. Keep in mind that he had to actually take the time to go out and look for it.

All of what he does and posts here is just like what he did as the Overfiend on another board. I have shown his posts to people who posted there and without any prompting they immediately thought Overfiend. What’s even funnier is that the reactions he gets here are exactly the same as what he got there. The accusations of avoiding questions. Spamming. In fact, the reason he left the other forum was that a moderator, after suggesting he stop creating new threads and keep similarly themed posts all on one thread (hmmmmm, didn’t someone here suggest that recently?) simply deleted all of his threads but one that were all about the same thing.

[zecarlo]

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Hate crime statistics are not accurate, because black on white crime is almost never classified as a “hate” crime.
[/quote]

utah gets it. and so do the silent majority who don’t want to get pissed on in a shitstorm of trolling and slander.

whites are charged with 56 percent of the hate crimes yet african americans disproportionately commit violent crimes not only against white people but against each other as well.
[/quote]
What? If black on white crime is almost never classified as a hate crime then what race is the 44% that gets accused of hate crimes? If most of that 44% is black it suggests that blacks are disproportionately accused of hate crimes. So what exactly are you trying to say?

BTW, you also need to factor in that not all hate crimes are race based so that 56% who are white committed some of those crimes against others whites, you know, gays, Jews, Muslims, etc.

[H_factor]

Not to mention z he has posted stuff like that consistently. On another board I used to post on this one guy was vehemently against homosexuals. He did like c-dog does, every post of his was about one topic. He had all sorts of creepy images as well. I told him that for someone who is against gay sex he sure does think about it all the time. The images he posted were of men on men, etc.

The people who are the most scared are also the people who think about and obsess about the shit over and over again. It’s like smh says about kneedragger…for someone against gay sex he sure does spend a whole lot of time thinking and posting about gay guys. He thinks about gay guys far more often than any straight guy I know.

Even if C-dog was capable of making good points (he isn’t really, lack of intelligence and logic is obvious in his history) he would still be annoying because he only is capable of posting one type of thread. Black person does something bad to white person. I can’t imagine how horrific it is to have something DOMINATE your thoughts at all times. I basically think about sports, lifting, hot chicks most often. He thinks about black people over and over and over and over. It’s almost like he has a condition where when he clicks on PWI to view the forum his brain just starts saying:

Black crime, black crime, black crime, black crime, black crime. His only break in here from thinking about black crime is to search or create cartoons and in some of those pictures he is searching for men on men. This is why I stopped posting about me in real life, anything I’ve said about me personally he remembers and posts about it. From where I live to my education the sports teams I root for, etc.

C-dog is NOT the type of person who needs to know any more personal details about me because he is not mentally stable. I didn’t really put this together until he started demanding pictures of my degrees. I’m not 100% sure if C-Dog knew where I lived or my phone number that he wouldn’t try to visit me. The dude is not ok.

[UtahLama]

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. [/quote]

I’m curious why you think this Z…you reference it often, but I must be missing something?

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof.[/quote]
Because he would post the kind of porn that wasn’t kiddie porn but was supposed to sort of look like it. I assume the “women” were over 18 but they looked like minors. They had the bodies of young boys: no curves, no ass, no chest. I did not find it appealing and now, after having read how he stalks his neighbor’s daughter, I really wonder about what sort of weirdo he is.
[/quote]

Sounds a little gross…is it on another board that you found him, or was it on T-Nation?

[H_factor]

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. [/quote]

I’m curious why you think this Z…you reference it often, but I must be missing something?

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof.[/quote]
Because he would post the kind of porn that wasn’t kiddie porn but was supposed to sort of look like it. I assume the “women” were over 18 but they looked like minors. They had the bodies of young boys: no curves, no ass, no chest. I did not find it appealing and now, after having read how he stalks his neighbor’s daughter, I really wonder about what sort of weirdo he is.
[/quote]

Sounds a little gross…is it on another board that you found him, or was it on T-Nation?
[/quote]

Different board he used to frequent z has said in the past.

Honestly I don’t really care if he is that guy or is not that guy. I post here and I care about this forum and not some other one. If he wants to go post his race diatribes someplace else that is fine with me.

It’s weird though on a center-right board (which is how I view this one) that he picks to discuss the things he discusses. It isn’t like this forum is filled with people who are in love with the media or obsessed with blaming white people for everything, etc. Those places DO exist this place just isn’t one of them. It doesn’t make much logical sense, but I don’t think we’re dealing with logic here.

[zecarlo]

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. [/quote]

I’m curious why you think this Z…you reference it often, but I must be missing something?

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof.[/quote]
Because he would post the kind of porn that wasn’t kiddie porn but was supposed to sort of look like it. I assume the “women” were over 18 but they looked like minors. They had the bodies of young boys: no curves, no ass, no chest. I did not find it appealing and now, after having read how he stalks his neighbor’s daughter, I really wonder about what sort of weirdo he is.
[/quote]

Sounds a little gross…is it on another board that you found him, or was it on T-Nation?
[/quote]

Different board he used to frequent z has said in the past.

Honestly I don’t really care if he is that guy or is not that guy. I post here and I care about this forum and not some other one. If he wants to go post his race diatribes someplace else that is fine with me.

It’s weird though on a center-right board (which is how I view this one) that he picks to discuss the things he discusses. It isn’t like this forum is filled with people who are in love with the media or obsessed with blaming white people for everything, etc. Those places DO exist this place just isn’t one of them. It doesn’t make much logical sense, but I don’t think we’re dealing with logic here. [/quote]
You think it doesn’t make sense but go look at Stormfront. I doubt any blacks or liberals post there but that is all they talk about.

[zecarlo]

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. [/quote]

I’m curious why you think this Z…you reference it often, but I must be missing something?

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof.[/quote]
Because he would post the kind of porn that wasn’t kiddie porn but was supposed to sort of look like it. I assume the “women” were over 18 but they looked like minors. They had the bodies of young boys: no curves, no ass, no chest. I did not find it appealing and now, after having read how he stalks his neighbor’s daughter, I really wonder about what sort of weirdo he is.
[/quote]

Sounds a little gross…is it on another board that you found him, or was it on T-Nation?
[/quote]
It was a different board, an mma themed one. Interestingly, his join date here sort of coincides with when he left there.

[H_factor]

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Cdog should not be allowed around kids. I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t. [/quote]

I’m curious why you think this Z…you reference it often, but I must be missing something?

I am on board with your feelings if I see some proof.[/quote]
Because he would post the kind of porn that wasn’t kiddie porn but was supposed to sort of look like it. I assume the “women” were over 18 but they looked like minors. They had the bodies of young boys: no curves, no ass, no chest. I did not find it appealing and now, after having read how he stalks his neighbor’s daughter, I really wonder about what sort of weirdo he is.
[/quote]

Sounds a little gross…is it on another board that you found him, or was it on T-Nation?
[/quote]

Different board he used to frequent z has said in the past.

Honestly I don’t really care if he is that guy or is not that guy. I post here and I care about this forum and not some other one. If he wants to go post his race diatribes someplace else that is fine with me.

It’s weird though on a center-right board (which is how I view this one) that he picks to discuss the things he discusses. It isn’t like this forum is filled with people who are in love with the media or obsessed with blaming white people for everything, etc. Those places DO exist this place just isn’t one of them. It doesn’t make much logical sense, but I don’t think we’re dealing with logic here. [/quote]
You think it doesn’t make sense but go look at Stormfront. I doubt any blacks or liberals post there but that is all they talk about. [/quote]

Yeah, but if I was on some KKK board I would expect to talk about how bad black people are ya know? Even if no black people ever posted there. It’s like “this is a place where we can hang out and hate black people and talk about how horrible they are.” Not a place I’d go, but I get the discussion taking place there. Still horrible, but it’s like Stormfront was DESIGNED for that. Hey racists, here’s a spot we can all hang out on. Sorta like a pedophile message board.

PWI is simply a politics and world issue forum where for the most part no one really talks about race a whole bunch minus one person. It’s just odd I guess. We would discuss race at times if C-dog didn’t post here (Trayvon Martin, first black President, etc, etc, etc,) but we discuss it much more because he constantly fills up the forum with it.

And he argues “against” the liberal media all day and all night in here like everyone who posts here worships Rachel Maddow or something. Like I said, it’s just…weird. I’ve asked him before who in threads he is talking about when he says liberals and liberal media but it’s basically anyone who disagrees with him. If Utah or push or me or smh or anyone else disagrees it’s because they are brainwashed by liberals. Nick who is an anarcho capitalistic guy and about the furthest possible thing from a liberal would be a liberal to C if he tried to point out inconsistencies in his post.

[conservativedog]

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Hate crime statistics are not accurate, because black on white crime is almost never classified as a “hate” crime.
[/quote]

utah gets it.

[/quote]

Then: Where can accurate data be found? Do you have them? Do they prove that more blacks commit racially-motivated crime than whites? By how much?

Where is the hard, accurate data? Where is the proof that what you’re so concerned about is worth being so concerned about? Youtube videos and anecdotes will be summarily ignored: They are useless, and it would do you much good to become aware of that. [/b][/quote]

what black liberal expert authoritative figure is telling you what to think now?

youtube videos from nightly newscasts are useless. i see. KNOCKOUT GAME selfie videos are useless. i see. youtube videos from store cameras with 100’s of blacks looting stores are useless. i see.

you can’t take a dump without an expert telling you when. education used to be about HOW TO THINK not what to think. over 75% of today’s university professors are liberal, look it up.

how can you go through several years of education without the slow gradual process of information and ideas influencing you? well sadly most can’t. you have been duped by your government.

P.S

by the way since about a week ago your educational and “government study” enlightenment anecdotes have been summarily ignored. but thanks for playing along.

[conservativedog]

[quote]H factor wrote:

Yeah, but if I was on some KKK board I would expect to talk about how bad black people are ya know? Even if no black people ever posted there. It’s like “this is a place where we can hang out and hate black people and talk about how horrible they are.” [/quote]

that place is called prison. where blacks, latinos, skinhead nazis segregate themselves and fight each other. that’s maybe what you’re dreaming about.

i’m 51, i wasn’t burning crosses in front yards back in the 40’& 50’s you fuckin shit4brains.

i was a teenager in the 70’s, you know with Aerosmith, Bob Seger, KISS, ZZ Topp, Peter Frampton and oh yeah David Gates and Bread. those are the concerts i went to and music i played over and over. Lynard Skynard also

check their lyrics out it wasn’t hate shit like cop killing and fuckin bitches and hoes or tellin their boyfriends to mind their own business before they wind up in the trunk of “my bentley”

seriously when was the last time KKK affected anything in your little world?

KKK my ass what a retard.

[quote]H factor wrote:
PWI is simply a politics and world issue forum where for the most part no one really talks about race a whole bunch minus one person. It’s just odd I guess. We would discuss race at times if C-dog didn’t post here (Trayvon Martin, first black President, etc, etc, etc,) but we discuss it much more because he constantly fills up the forum with it. [/quote]

i didn’t know you were a mod.

please forgive my accept my apology for being in line with your entire ideology. i want friends like you so i know what to talk about and so i can be popular, like you H-factless. that’s the important thing…not to rock the boat and upset four or five of the cool guys at PWI.

[quote]H factor wrote:
And he argues “against” the liberal media all day and all night in here like everyone who posts here worships Rachel Maddow or something. Like I said, it’s just…weird. I’ve asked him before who in threads he is talking about when he says liberals and liberal media but it’s basically anyone who disagrees with him. [/quote]

Satan’s greatest trick was convincing the world he didn’t exist. What do you guess the socialists greatest trick is?

no one ever wonders why the majority of all magazines, newspapers, and most tv media leans way left?

is there no one that asks how is it that political correctness always rules the day? i mean really i can’t enjoy an old movie on turner classic movies because they always talking about feeling gay. didn’t they know what it really meant?

damn no one better mention race either it’s not politically correct. but let’s all laugh at fat people, short people and even funnier and perfectly safe to make fun of, those short people with short you know whats!

haha it’s great fun to know what we can talk about and then attack those that don’t know what they can talk about, because they are all KKK NAZI RACISTS.

[H_factor]

Hey smh I’m going to post and ask you questions then at the end tell you I’m ignoring you. C-dog likes to talk to himself. He has no time for anyone else to talk and think

[conservativedog]

[quote]H factor wrote:
Hey smh I’m going to post and ask you questions then at the end tell you I’m ignoring you. C-dog likes to talk to himself. He has no time for anyone else to talk and think[/quote]

i was responding to something smh asked me. your response doesn’t make sense because it’s out of context.

if you ever read the posts once or twice you could connect the dots and see the references are not always to or about you. there are many other readers, not just you. your writing is no different then a fuckin dog gulping down every meal as if it were his last.

you are trying to be cute with your smart ass “kodak moments” and completely miss what i was in the paragraph. about 90% of your responses to me are just as i described.

master’s degree, fiance …i think you tell a lot of tall tales. next you will be telling us you’re moving out of your mothers basement. lol.

to defend myself from you and zecarlos slanderous kkk, skinhead nazi & kiddie porn accusations is an interesting endeavor. both of you lie like little snot nosed punks. you mention these horrible sites i’ve never been to or heard of but both of you are evidently pretty knowledgeable about.

[conservativedog]

[quote]H factor wrote:
The thing is NO ONE argues counter to what you say. We just don’t know why you keep saying it. Where has someone said blacks don’t commit crimes. They do. Disproportionately. It’s an AWFUL thing. It’s sad. It’s a HUGE problem. NO ONE IS ARGUING IT ISN’T.

We just wonder WHY that’s all you care about.
[/quote]

yes it’s a huge problem. it is not all i care about but because my line of work is smack in the middle of it.

the solution? i said months ago if they can find money to keep building new stadiums and arenas then find money to build more prisons. or send them out to sheriff joe’s tent city.