It somewhat surprises me that as a public servant you have not been fired yet for how partisan you are. I thought career public servants were supposed to be neutral people. Tax payers sure are not getting a good return on their investment here.
So what is an example of a highly populated republican city with a low murder or crime rate?
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
As far as who was in charge when the economy was going south? Democrats held control of both the House and Senate from 2007 into Obammy’s first term. Bush was president but the democrats held all the cards as they were the majority and also had control of Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac housing loans.
Rewrite it anyway you want we are divided, just like our enemies want.
Once again the current definition of a racist…somebody winning an argument with a liberal.
[/quote]
Of course they were. Some Democrats voted for Iraq so we can blame that on them as well. And remember Clinton’s surpluses? We can give ALL that credit to the Republican Congress. And Reagan would have WIPED OUT the debt, but those pesky Democrats and their damn budgets! Either way, he deserves ALL the credit for the economy despite the Democratic control of the legislature. Right? I’m starting to get good at this! It’s ALL the Democrats fault if something goes bad and ALL the Republicans fault when something goes good!
Surely we wouldn’t want to say anything weird like Democrats tend to grow government when in power and Republicans do the same in perhaps a different manner. Nah, let’s stay away from that. Let’s “stay divided” as you say, by painting the other side as always evil. I love having a team. FWIW as someone who says our enemies want us divided I’m surprised you come off so partisan. This is probably what our enemies want, but it’s DEFINITELY what the two parties want. They can cycle control of power in this scenario.
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
As far as who was in charge when the economy was going south? Democrats held control of both the House and Senate from 2007 into Obammy’s first term. Bush was president but the democrats held all the cards as they were the majority and also had control of Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac housing loans.
Rewrite it anyway you want we are divided, just like our enemies want.
Once again the current definition of a racist…somebody winning an argument with a liberal.
[/quote]
Of course they were. Some Democrats voted for Iraq so we can blame that on them as well. And remember Clinton’s surpluses? We can give ALL that credit to the Republican Congress. And Reagan would have WIPED OUT the debt, but those pesky Democrats and their damn budgets! Either way, he deserves ALL the credit for the economy despite the Democratic control of the legislature. Right? I’m starting to get good at this! It’s ALL the Democrats fault if something goes bad and ALL the Republicans fault when something goes good!
Surely we wouldn’t want to say anything weird like Democrats tend to grow government when in power and Republicans do the same in perhaps a different manner. Nah, let’s stay away from that. Let’s “stay divided” as you say, by painting the other side as always evil. I love having a team. FWIW as someone who says our enemies want us divided I’m surprised you come off so partisan. This is probably what our enemies want, but it’s DEFINITELY what the two parties want. They can cycle control of power in this scenario. [/quote]
Have you never heard of a communist? Is there or is there not a communist party here in the United States? Were there not stories on the “major news” networks saying that China and Russia were pleased that Obama won the election? What else can I say? Welcome comrade the change is about to become evident.
What is so good about Democrat policies and why do there cities go bankrupt before Republican run cities?
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/03/us-usa-tax-irs-idUSBRE8B21HA20121203
[quote]nickj_777 wrote:
It somewhat surprises me that as a public servant you have not been fired yet for how partisan you are. I thought career public servants were supposed to be neutral people. Tax payers sure are not getting a good return on their investment here.[/quote]
Maybe you have never heard of the first amendment friend. Maybe your idea of thought being a crime hasn’t caught on in my community.
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
So what is an example of a highly populated republican city with a low murder or crime rate?[/quote]
Feeling like someone is not doing what you want them to? Do the homework and bring a few more sentences into the fray instead of lazy ass questions that put the onus on someone else.
Who’s in charge of Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington DC etc… ect… lazy ass smart alec. If you don’t like what I write read posts you agree with and don’t take up space here. Be informed not opinionated.
Opinions are like assholes everyone has one. Be original and perhaps you will become diverse. 98% of a city voting for Obama such as the city of Washington D.C. is not an example of diversity it’s the opposite.
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
[quote]nickj_777 wrote:
It somewhat surprises me that as a public servant you have not been fired yet for how partisan you are. I thought career public servants were supposed to be neutral people. Tax payers sure are not getting a good return on their investment here.[/quote]
Maybe you have never heard of the first amendment friend. Maybe your idea of thought being a crime hasn’t caught on in my community.
[/quote]
Yeah, a tin hat wearing crackpot like yourself supposedly works for an elite government agency… “Your community” also values OPSEC and discretion, something you seem to be having major issues with.
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
So what is an example of a highly populated republican city with a low murder or crime rate?[/quote]
Feeling like someone is not doing what you want them to? Do the homework and bring a few more sentences into the fray instead of lazy ass questions that put the onus on someone else.
Who’s in charge of Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington DC etc… ect… lazy ass smart alec. If you don’t like what I write read posts you agree with and don’t take up space here. Be informed not opinionated.
Opinions are like assholes everyone has one. Be original and perhaps you will become diverse. 98% of a city voting for Obama such as the city of Washington D.C. is not an example of diversity it’s the opposite.
[/quote]
i can’t even process the irony here
holy shit
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
So what is an example of a highly populated republican city with a low murder or crime rate?[/quote]
Feeling like someone is not doing what you want them to? Do the homework and bring a few more sentences into the fray instead of lazy ass questions that put the onus on someone else.
Who’s in charge of Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington DC etc… ect… lazy ass smart alec. If you don’t like what I write read posts you agree with and don’t take up space here. Be informed not opinionated.
Opinions are like assholes everyone has one. Be original and perhaps you will become diverse. 98% of a city voting for Obama such as the city of Washington D.C. is not an example of diversity it’s the opposite.
[/quote]
You could have just said “there are none”. When you talk about how great republicans are you need to give examples of what they have done good when all else is equal, governing a small town is not a victory against decreasing crime in large cities.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
So what is an example of a highly populated republican city with a low murder or crime rate?[/quote]
Feeling like someone is not doing what you want them to? Do the homework and bring a few more sentences into the fray instead of lazy ass questions that put the onus on someone else.
Who’s in charge of Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington DC etc… ect… lazy ass smart alec. If you don’t like what I write read posts you agree with and don’t take up space here. Be informed not opinionated.
Opinions are like assholes everyone has one. Be original and perhaps you will become diverse. 98% of a city voting for Obama such as the city of Washington D.C. is not an example of diversity it’s the opposite.
[/quote]
i can’t even process the irony here
holy shit[/quote]
If you don’t mind my asking, are you in Northen Queensland mak?
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
So what is an example of a highly populated republican city with a low murder or crime rate?[/quote]
Feeling like someone is not doing what you want them to? Do the homework and bring a few more sentences into the fray instead of lazy ass questions that put the onus on someone else.
Who’s in charge of Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington DC etc… ect… lazy ass smart alec. If you don’t like what I write read posts you agree with and don’t take up space here. Be informed not opinionated.
Opinions are like assholes everyone has one. Be original and perhaps you will become diverse. 98% of a city voting for Obama such as the city of Washington D.C. is not an example of diversity it’s the opposite.
[/quote]
i can’t even process the irony here
holy shit[/quote]
If you don’t mind my asking, are you in Northen Queensland mak?
[/quote]
nein
south eastern usually unless work calls me out to darwin/adelaide/perth
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
So what is an example of a highly populated republican city with a low murder or crime rate?[/quote]
Feeling like someone is not doing what you want them to? Do the homework and bring a few more sentences into the fray instead of lazy ass questions that put the onus on someone else.
Who’s in charge of Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington DC etc… ect… lazy ass smart alec. If you don’t like what I write read posts you agree with and don’t take up space here. Be informed not opinionated.
Opinions are like assholes everyone has one. Be original and perhaps you will become diverse. 98% of a city voting for Obama such as the city of Washington D.C. is not an example of diversity it’s the opposite.
[/quote]
i can’t even process the irony here
holy shit[/quote]
That word opinion…it doesn’t mean what he thinks it means.
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
You certainly aren’t bitching about the broken record OP are you? [/quote]
No, and I’m not commenting on them either outside of small snippets here and there.
Depends on the content of your posts. I don’t comment on every point in every post.
Doesn’t annoy me, it is more or less your only pony at this point. Sucks because I though you had more to offer in the way of conversation than constant finger pointing and attacking posters…
Guess I was wrong.
I don’t agree with everything OP says, but I’m not going to argue with him about the stuff we don’t agree on, why? Because I’ve tried to, and it was pointless, so I let it go and comment abotu the points I see with merit, like I do in most threads.[/quote]
You haven’t been following my posts very well if all you think I do is finger point and attack…though it is weird that you complain about that from me in a thread where you come in finger pointing and attacking me. My complaint with this thread was legitimate. It doesn’t attempt to generate discussion and is like so many other Obama sucks threads I posted earlier. When one starts a thread the goal shouldn’t be this is how I feel. That’s what blogs are for. It should try to generate discussion about a topic. At least that’s my opinion. Feel free to finger point and attack me for it of course, you already started.
I have no desire to fight on the internet, that gets you nowhere. I do have a tendency to highlight the inconsistencies of people, and that tends to anger them. Sometimes I respond in anger as well which is a flaw of mine, but it isn’t my goal. [/quote]
Totally missed my point. But that is okay, continue on with the broken record.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
You certainly aren’t bitching about the broken record OP are you? [/quote]
No, and I’m not commenting on them either outside of small snippets here and there.
Depends on the content of your posts. I don’t comment on every point in every post.
Doesn’t annoy me, it is more or less your only pony at this point. Sucks because I though you had more to offer in the way of conversation than constant finger pointing and attacking posters…
Guess I was wrong.
I don’t agree with everything OP says, but I’m not going to argue with him about the stuff we don’t agree on, why? Because I’ve tried to, and it was pointless, so I let it go and comment abotu the points I see with merit, like I do in most threads.[/quote]
You haven’t been following my posts very well if all you think I do is finger point and attack…though it is weird that you complain about that from me in a thread where you come in finger pointing and attacking me. My complaint with this thread was legitimate. It doesn’t attempt to generate discussion and is like so many other Obama sucks threads I posted earlier. When one starts a thread the goal shouldn’t be this is how I feel. That’s what blogs are for. It should try to generate discussion about a topic. At least that’s my opinion. Feel free to finger point and attack me for it of course, you already started.
I have no desire to fight on the internet, that gets you nowhere. I do have a tendency to highlight the inconsistencies of people, and that tends to anger them. Sometimes I respond in anger as well which is a flaw of mine, but it isn’t my goal. [/quote]
Totally missed my point. But that is okay, continue on with the broken record.[/quote]
Right. Just to recap in a thread where the OP makes YET ANOTHER anti-Obama thread with no substance which we have had so many of recently, you decide to attack the guy who says can’t we put an end to the BROKEN RECORD (to steal your words) of anti-Obama threads that don’t setup discussion?
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
You certainly aren’t bitching about the broken record OP are you? [/quote]
No, and I’m not commenting on them either outside of small snippets here and there.
Depends on the content of your posts. I don’t comment on every point in every post.
Doesn’t annoy me, it is more or less your only pony at this point. Sucks because I though you had more to offer in the way of conversation than constant finger pointing and attacking posters…
Guess I was wrong.
I don’t agree with everything OP says, but I’m not going to argue with him about the stuff we don’t agree on, why? Because I’ve tried to, and it was pointless, so I let it go and comment abotu the points I see with merit, like I do in most threads.[/quote]
You haven’t been following my posts very well if all you think I do is finger point and attack…though it is weird that you complain about that from me in a thread where you come in finger pointing and attacking me. My complaint with this thread was legitimate. It doesn’t attempt to generate discussion and is like so many other Obama sucks threads I posted earlier. When one starts a thread the goal shouldn’t be this is how I feel. That’s what blogs are for. It should try to generate discussion about a topic. At least that’s my opinion. Feel free to finger point and attack me for it of course, you already started.
I have no desire to fight on the internet, that gets you nowhere. I do have a tendency to highlight the inconsistencies of people, and that tends to anger them. Sometimes I respond in anger as well which is a flaw of mine, but it isn’t my goal. [/quote]
Totally missed my point. But that is okay, continue on with the broken record.[/quote]
Right. Just to recap in a thread where the OP makes YET ANOTHER anti-Obama thread with no substance which we have had so many of recently, you decide to attack the guy who says can’t we put an end to the BROKEN RECORD (to steal your words) of anti-Obama threads that don’t setup discussion?
[/quote]
I tell you what, I’ll start calling out troll threads when you post something other than the same 2-3 comments you drop in every thread, how’s that?
LOL @ complaining about substance when I can predict every one of your posts just seeing it was you who commented.
Good lord. For someone who loves to point out other’s flaws & repeating of post topics, you sure don’t look in the mirror often.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
You certainly aren’t bitching about the broken record OP are you? [/quote]
No, and I’m not commenting on them either outside of small snippets here and there.
Depends on the content of your posts. I don’t comment on every point in every post.
Doesn’t annoy me, it is more or less your only pony at this point. Sucks because I though you had more to offer in the way of conversation than constant finger pointing and attacking posters…
Guess I was wrong.
I don’t agree with everything OP says, but I’m not going to argue with him about the stuff we don’t agree on, why? Because I’ve tried to, and it was pointless, so I let it go and comment abotu the points I see with merit, like I do in most threads.[/quote]
You haven’t been following my posts very well if all you think I do is finger point and attack…though it is weird that you complain about that from me in a thread where you come in finger pointing and attacking me. My complaint with this thread was legitimate. It doesn’t attempt to generate discussion and is like so many other Obama sucks threads I posted earlier. When one starts a thread the goal shouldn’t be this is how I feel. That’s what blogs are for. It should try to generate discussion about a topic. At least that’s my opinion. Feel free to finger point and attack me for it of course, you already started.
I have no desire to fight on the internet, that gets you nowhere. I do have a tendency to highlight the inconsistencies of people, and that tends to anger them. Sometimes I respond in anger as well which is a flaw of mine, but it isn’t my goal. [/quote]
Totally missed my point. But that is okay, continue on with the broken record.[/quote]
Right. Just to recap in a thread where the OP makes YET ANOTHER anti-Obama thread with no substance which we have had so many of recently, you decide to attack the guy who says can’t we put an end to the BROKEN RECORD (to steal your words) of anti-Obama threads that don’t setup discussion?
[/quote]
I tell you what, I’ll start calling out troll threads when you post something other than the same 2-3 comments you drop in every thread, how’s that?
LOL @ complaining about substance when I can predict every one of your posts just seeing it was you who commented.
Good lord. For someone who loves to point out other’s flaws & repeating of post topics, you sure don’t look in the mirror often.[/quote]
Again, you aren’t very familiar with my posts, yet you’re commenting on them like you have read every single one of them. In the past few days I have wondered why Bob Costas wants to take away my guns, been excited to read about the why is your religion better thread, commented on the Lincoln movie and Daniel Day Lewis performance, lamented the fact that Obamacare is a disaster in a Maximus thread, and tried to figure out what Tirib believes in regards to young earth creationism.
You should quit while you’re behind. Or just keep attacking me over and over while complaining about attacks.
[quote]H factor wrote:
You should quit while you’re behind. Or just keep attacking me over and over while complaining about attacks. [/quote]
Yawn…
OFA at its worst.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
You should quit while you’re behind. Or just keep attacking me over and over while complaining about attacks. [/quote]
Yawn…
OFA at its worst.[/quote]
Yeah, figured you wouldn’t try to make an argument against what I posted.
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
You should quit while you’re behind. Or just keep attacking me over and over while complaining about attacks. [/quote]
Yawn…
OFA at its worst.[/quote]
Yeah, figured you wouldn’t try to make an argument against what I posted. [/quote]
LOL, you are defending your post content. After, I might add, I tried twice to talk about good ol’ Timmy, and you just continued on and on about me “attacking you” like this is some epic post battle, and complaining about troll threads. At this point I’m just waiting for you to bring up Ronny and how awful the “right” is.
So, while I’d love to sit here an talk about your current posts and how wonderful they are, there is no point. And you not seeing that is part of the humor here.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]H factor wrote:
You should quit while you’re behind. Or just keep attacking me over and over while complaining about attacks. [/quote]
Yawn…
OFA at its worst.[/quote]
Yeah, figured you wouldn’t try to make an argument against what I posted. [/quote]
LOL, you are defending your post content. After, I might add, I tried twice to talk about good ol’ Timmy, and you just continued on and on about me “attacking you” like this is some epic post battle, and complaining about troll threads. At this point I’m just waiting for you to bring up Ronny and how awful the “right” is.
So, while I’d love to sit here an talk about your current posts and how wonderful they are, there is no point. And you not seeing that is part of the humor here.
[/quote]
-
When my post content is attacked I defended it to show you you were wrong.
-
The attacks on me started with you, and you haven’t ended them.
-
Of course the right is awful, they are just like the left. I don’t have a problem pointing out the flaws in the lefts hero Obama or the rights hero Reagan. Since lefts don’t really post here, most of it is aimed at the hypocritical righties. As a righty this bothers you which is why you attack me and not yet another content less Obama sucks thread. That doesn’t bother you. You could read about Obama being shitty all day long. But someone calls that out and bam, you gotta go after THEM!
-
Oh I’ve already pointed out the humor in you attacking me and not the OP troll thread, nothing else you’ve posted is funny. Annoying perhaps, but not comedic.