Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.[/quote]
Their interest in rape porn certainly has a lot to do with how they view women, I would imagine.
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.[/quote]
Their interest in rape porn certainly has a lot to do with how they view women, I would imagine.[/quote]
This honestly doesn’t surprise me even a tiny bit.
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.[/quote]
Their interest in rape porn certainly has a lot to do with how they view women, I would imagine.[/quote]
So what does Japanese Bukkake have to do with?
Or Lolicon?
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.[/quote]
It’s a spiritually powerless pagan false religion with one of the sickest most perverse views of male/female relationships imaginable. Viewed in that light why would it be surprising that a country where 95% of the people claim to hold those views is saturated in deviant porn?
[quote]Otep wrote:
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.[/quote]
Their interest in rape porn certainly has a lot to do with how they view women, I would imagine.[/quote]
So what does Japanese Bukkake have to do with?
Or Lolicon?[/quote]
Do you really want to discuss the relationship between one of the most dehumanizing ways to treat a woman and the likely societal repercussions that would result if such an act was widely sought out for sexual gratification? Particularly when the religions/social laws that protect these women are sorely lacking?
No, I don’t think it is too far off the mark to assume that people who get sexual gratification from the fantasy of forcing themselves upon women treat them as inferiors in other areas of life, as well. That might not be very PC of me, but oh well.
I do not consider anyone who has a sexual fixation on rape to be particularly “normal” when it comes to human interaction. I would say the same about people who masturbate to erotic cartoon images of children, as well.
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]Otep wrote:
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.[/quote]
Their interest in rape porn certainly has a lot to do with how they view women, I would imagine.[/quote]
So what does Japanese Bukkake have to do with?
Or Lolicon?[/quote]
Do you really want to discuss the relationship between one of the most dehumanizing ways to treat a woman and the likely societal repercussions that would result if such an act was widely sought out for sexual gratification? Particularly when the religions/social laws that protect these women are sorely lacking?
No, I don’t think it is too far off the mark to assume that people who get sexual gratification from the fantasy of forcing themselves upon women treat them as inferiors in other areas of life, as well. That might not be very PC of me, but oh well.
I do not consider anyone who has a sexual fixation on rape to be particularly “normal” when it comes to human interaction. I would say the same about people who masturbate to erotic cartoon images of children, as well.[/quote]
Just wanted to see if your opinion was consistent.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Otep wrote:
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Maybe the problem is too much camel porn?[/quote]
Wadda shock
[/quote]
I personally am pretty shocked. It was not just camel porn, but rape, animals, and child, that just really discusts me.[/quote]
Their interest in rape porn certainly has a lot to do with how they view women, I would imagine.[/quote]
So what does Japanese Bukkake have to do with?
[/quote]
Bukkake was first represented in pornographic films in the mid to late 1980s in Japan.[5][7] According to one commentator, a significant factor in the development of bukkake as a pornographic form was the mandatory censorship in Japan where genitals must be pixelated by a “mosaic”.[10] One consequence of this is that Japanese pornography tends to focus more on the face and body of actresses rather than on their genitals.[10] Since film producers could not show penetration, they sought other ways to depict sex acts without violating Japanese law and since semen did not need to be censored, a loophole existed for harder sex scenes…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukkake[/quote]
I’m fairly certain the Japanese censorship on genitals has been relaxed.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Nope.
It’s now legal to show pubic hair; that’s the change.
The “pixels” remain.[/quote]
Okay. I’m guessing you’re in-country, so I defer to your knowledge. I can only assume they publish work for export without said editing.
/hi-jack