What if Your True Love Died 400 Yrs Ago

Off Topic
221

This is hilarious

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Edevus wrote:
Guess who wrote this in the past :


We are all single at some point, right? I was married for 6 years, have a daughter. just seeing how women are today, how they act. how quickly they break up with a boyfriend. I want something that seems to no longer exist. a woman with a bit of class. not some skanky whore. a woman who will be loyal and devoted. and put me above all. and i will also do the same. put her above all. like i said many times, i was born in the wrong century.

Mystery solved.

[/quote]

Allow me to translate. This thing is heavy with projection.

“I’m single now, lonely and hating women. My marriage didn’t last long and I do not have custody of my daughter. My ex-wife left me. I don’t think my ex-wife had any class. She cheated on me, left me for another, or has someone now and I think she’s a “skanky” whore. She refused to put up with my extended-into-mid-life adolescences, love or vampires, love of 400 year old serial killers, my AAS abuse, my insecurity, and narcissim. She was not loyal and devoted (because I was devoted to myself and to things that teenage boys obsess over). When I find another adult that is into vampires, 400 year old women, AAS abuse and adolescent middle age men, I will hold her and love her and squeeze her and never let her go. Since I cannot find an adult who is “loyal and devoted”, I continue to look for emotionally damaged 20-somethings, so that I can continue role playing vampire and “monster” for as long as possible. I was born in the wrong century, because 100’s of years ago, I could make arrangements to marry a 12 year old, and she’d have to do what I tell her to do and she wouldn’t be permitted to divorce me and she’d be into things like vampires (because I told her to) and I’d condition her to worship my narcissism.”

Dude, my mom said I was born in the wrong century too - because of the “man” things I do and our society certainly is less tolerant of that - not because I’m in love with 400 year old women and liken myself to a vampire.

You’re one interesting dude. I will say this - you can’t make this shit up. And although I don’t quite talk about “TNation” characters in real life, I want to tell someone about you, but I’m just not sure where to start or how the story would be perceived. They’d probably think I was off my rocker for participating in a forum with someone like you.

“Dude, there’s this guy on the internet and we’re in a discussion about his love for a 400 year old woman and…”

“Huh? What is an internet forum? Is that like Facebook?”

“No dude, it’s a bodybuilding, health, weightlifting site - I go for the articles, great articles and information.”

“<raised eyebrow, skeptical look>, so why the fuck are you talking about 400 year old dead women?”

“dude, there’s this guy right, and he claims to be really big, and his name is “rogue vampire” and…”

“<interrupts me, look of disbelief> vampire? <looks at me like “who the fuck are you”>”

“never mind”[/quote]

222

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Stern wrote:
Well, technically, she’s probably about as close to a real vampire as it gets I would say :stuck_out_tongue:

Saying who she is though might make a HUGE difference. Maybe you’re not alone, have you ever considered that?

ed- if it turned out someone else fancied her as well would you get mad?[/quote]

actually, yes, its the countess. but let me just say this. she was no more a vampire than anyone else. just about everything written about her is complete garbage. most of these myths came about long after she died. made up by people. she didn’t bath in blood. she didnt kill 600 girls. but thats a long long story. yes, i realize many people fancy her.

when i was younger, i was into bruce lee like nobody else. read everything about im, countless books. pics all over my walls. yet, i could never write a book about him. nor could i tell you how he felt about things, as a child. growing up. he was my idol for years and years to. [/quote]

Let me get this straight: You’re a grown man with a child. Your profile name is ‘roguevampire’. You’re in love with a prolific serial killer who died 400 years ago and you think there should be a ‘holocaust memorial’ for all the animals killed by people?[/quote]

yes to all. only to, she wasn’t a serial killer. i do not have time to go into why that is so. it would take far to long. and I do not have the desire to educate someone who doesn’t want to be educated. 5 years or 400 years, makes no difference. if you had an ounce of brains youd realize time means nothing. [/quote]

A Habsburg conspiracy eh? Funny that they were able to produce over 300 witnesses from the peasantry to the nobility, servants at her household and priests.

Time means nothing? What about never having met the person with whom you’re supposed to be in love? Does that mean anything?

223

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Silfen wrote:

[quote]Gkhan wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

in every sci fi show on time travel, they always say, you can’t travel to the future, cause the future hasn’t happened yet. [/quote]

Not true, Marty and Doc traveled into the future.[/quote]
Actually, travel to the future is the only kind of time travel that is scientifically substantiated. All it takes is a really fast spaceship. It’s called special relativity.

Travel to the past requires much more difficult and/or poorly understood theoretical physics.

OP strikes me as incredibly irrational, to such an extent that it would probably be a waste of energy to try to talk him out of his version of reality.[/quote]

actually, in every single show i’ve seen on time travel, its going to the future, that is impossible, simply because it hasn’t happened yet. theres nothing to go to. but going to past, that has already occured. and its extremely possible to go back in time. can we do it right now, unless the government is hiding something(and we know they never ever hide anything, wink) its not possible at the moment. but in 100 years, maybe sooner, it probably will be possible. you must have missed the newest shows on time travel. about worm holes and such. [/quote]

No, that’s incorrect. Einstein-Rosen bridges, aka wormholes, are a theoretical construct that fell out of the mathematics of general relativity. There is currently no proof of concept - theoreticians have come up with a number of proposed mechanisms for creating stable, traversable wormholes, but there are no methods of producing them that are known to work.

Additionally, wormholes (as traditionally defined) are a “bridge” between any two points in spacetime, so they would allow for forward travel through time just as easily as backward travel.

Traveling forward through time happens from an effect known as time dilation. As an object’s speed approaches the speed of light, its perceived time approaches zero asymptotically. So the thing moving fast experiences very little passage of time, while the rest of the universe proceeds as normal. This has been confirmed experimentally (many times) and is a direct consequence of special relativity.

224

.

225

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
if you had an ounce of brains youd realize time means nothing. [/quote]

You mean, other than the fact that you can’t see her in real life because she’s already dead?

226

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Silfen wrote:

[quote]Gkhan wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

in every sci fi show on time travel, they always say, you can’t travel to the future, cause the future hasn’t happened yet. [/quote]

Not true, Marty and Doc traveled into the future.[/quote]
Actually, travel to the future is the only kind of time travel that is scientifically substantiated. All it takes is a really fast spaceship. It’s called special relativity.

Travel to the past requires much more difficult and/or poorly understood theoretical physics.

OP strikes me as incredibly irrational, to such an extent that it would probably be a waste of energy to try to talk him out of his version of reality.[/quote]

actually, in every single show i’ve seen on time travel, its going to the future, that is impossible, simply because it hasn’t happened yet. theres nothing to go to. but going to past, that has already occured. and its extremely possible to go back in time. can we do it right now, unless the government is hiding something(and we know they never ever hide anything, wink) its not possible at the moment. but in 100 years, maybe sooner, it probably will be possible. you must have missed the newest shows on time travel. about worm holes and such. [/quote]

Stephen Hawking would like to have a word with you, and very few reputable theoretical physicists disagree with this man.

227

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
I will just say, for someone who has never written anything in his life, to be able to sit down and write about someone, from long ago. to know how she thinks, speaks and almost everything about her, that goes far beyond normal comprehension.[/quote]

Hahahaha!

Well if you write like you post (and I don’t just mean with the numerous spelling errors), then no publisher will ever look past the first page of your “manuscript”. You haven’t even written a book before, and you have the audacity to label yourself an author?

LOL.[/quote]

i never said i was an author, if i did, my mistake. I am writing a book, and hope to have it published. and no, when i write, as in writing the book, everything is checked, grammar, propper usage of words. on here, i just tend to type and submit. not really trying to make it sound perfect.

228

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Stern wrote:
Well, technically, she’s probably about as close to a real vampire as it gets I would say :stuck_out_tongue:

Saying who she is though might make a HUGE difference. Maybe you’re not alone, have you ever considered that?

ed- if it turned out someone else fancied her as well would you get mad?[/quote]

actually, yes, its the countess. but let me just say this. she was no more a vampire than anyone else. just about everything written about her is complete garbage. most of these myths came about long after she died. made up by people. she didn’t bath in blood. she didnt kill 600 girls. but thats a long long story. yes, i realize many people fancy her.

when i was younger, i was into bruce lee like nobody else. read everything about im, countless books. pics all over my walls. yet, i could never write a book about him. nor could i tell you how he felt about things, as a child. growing up. he was my idol for years and years to. [/quote]

Let me get this straight: You’re a grown man with a child. Your profile name is ‘roguevampire’. You’re in love with a prolific serial killer who died 400 years ago and you think there should be a ‘holocaust memorial’ for all the animals killed by people?[/quote]

yes to all. only to, she wasn’t a serial killer. i do not have time to go into why that is so. it would take far to long. and I do not have the desire to educate someone who doesn’t want to be educated. 5 years or 400 years, makes no difference. if you had an ounce of brains youd realize time means nothing. [/quote]

A Habsburg conspiracy eh? Funny that they were able to produce over 300 witnesses from the peasantry to the nobility, servants at her household and priests.

Time means nothing? What about never having met the person with whom you’re supposed to be in love? Does that mean anything?[/quote]

the evidence against the countess would be laughed out of any court in the world today, are you kidding. let me educate you on the facts. hundreds of witnesses were questions, very true. but after questioning them, they had absolutely no evidence, so the requestioned the same witnesses over and over. the only witnesses that said she did anything wrong, were the 4 servants, who were caught red handed, in the act of torturing girls. The countess, where was she?? she was at her manor, in town.

Don’t you find it rather interesting they would question all these witnesses, yet, the one person they were after all along, they wouldn’t allow to testify. hmmmm. why is that. those 4 servants admitted to killing the girls. then under extreme torture said the countess “also” killed girls and told them to do it. that my friends is called “heresay” there was never any proof at all, direct proof the countess ever did anything wrong. what we do know is, many very rich people owed her tons of money and didn’t want to repay her. with her put away, they no longer had to. its a very complex story. but those 4 servants are the ones who should be called serial killers, not the countess.

229

I’ve written Charles Manson letters before.

230

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
I will just say, for someone who has never written anything in his life, to be able to sit down and write about someone, from long ago. to know how she thinks, speaks and almost everything about her, that goes far beyond normal comprehension.[/quote]

Hahahaha!

Well if you write like you post (and I don’t just mean with the numerous spelling errors), then no publisher will ever look past the first page of your “manuscript”. You haven’t even written a book before, and you have the audacity to label yourself an author?

LOL.[/quote]

i never said i was an author, if i did, my mistake. I am writing a book, and hope to have it published. and no, when i write, as in writing the book, everything is checked, grammar, propper usage of words. on here, i just tend to type and submit. not really trying to make it sound perfect. [/quote]

Here’s a tip: If you can’t type a coherent sentence without putting in an effort, you’re not going to get published. A proper writer is able to create a sentence that forms a clear statement of their ideas. It flows naturally for them. Already I can safely say I have a better chance of getting a book published than you, and I’m a fucking terrible writer. I’m not saying I expect “proper” English from a Bodybuilding website, I’m saying I expect it from an aspiring author.

Even Stephenie Meyer could write circles around you.

231

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I’ve written Charles Manson letters before.[/quote]

everyone calls charles manson a murderer. but do they realize, this guy wasn’t convicted of murder, cause he never actually killed anyone. he was convicted of conspiracy to committ murder. basically, his followers took a plee deal to testify against him. so they then testified that charlie planned it and told them to kill those people. these weren’t kids, these were adults capable of making thier own decisions. so they put all the blame on charlie.

232

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
I will just say, for someone who has never written anything in his life, to be able to sit down and write about someone, from long ago. to know how she thinks, speaks and almost everything about her, that goes far beyond normal comprehension.[/quote]

Hahahaha!

Well if you write like you post (and I don’t just mean with the numerous spelling errors), then no publisher will ever look past the first page of your “manuscript”. You haven’t even written a book before, and you have the audacity to label yourself an author?

LOL.[/quote]

i never said i was an author, if i did, my mistake. I am writing a book, and hope to have it published. and no, when i write, as in writing the book, everything is checked, grammar, propper usage of words. on here, i just tend to type and submit. not really trying to make it sound perfect. [/quote]

Here’s a tip: If you can’t type a coherent sentence without putting in an effort, you’re not going to get published. A proper writer is able to create a sentence that forms a clear statement of their ideas. It flows naturally for them. Already I can safely say I have a better chance of getting a book published than you, and I’m a fucking terrible writer. I’m not saying I expect “proper” English from a Bodybuilding website, I’m saying I expect it from an aspiring author.

Even Stephenie Meyer could write circles around you.[/quote]

trust me when i tell you, its much different typing here than writing a book. writing a book, you can sit and think about exactly how you want to describe certain things. here, i just type. you think writing a book is easy?? try it sometime. try making up a story. you can be great at putting sentences together, but that doesn’t mean you can write a book.

233

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I’ve written Charles Manson letters before.[/quote]

everyone calls charles manson a murderer. but do they realize, this guy wasn’t convicted of murder, cause he never actually killed anyone. he was convicted of conspiracy to committ murder. basically, his followers took a plee deal to testify against him. so they then testified that charlie planned it and told them to kill those people. these weren’t kids, these were adults capable of making thier own decisions. so they put all the blame on charlie. [/quote]

I know,. But you have to put a lot of guilt on his shoulders too. He rounded up drug addicts and crainwashed them into doing what he wanted. His followers acted as an extension ,much like a soilder that commits. Genocode.

I still think Charles Manson is a brilliant man who. Could have been something special…if a few things had went right for him in his early years.

He’s a murderer in history now but could have been an influential politician or artist.

234

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I’ve written Charles Manson letters before.[/quote]

everyone calls charles manson a murderer. but do they realize, this guy wasn’t convicted of murder, cause he never actually killed anyone. he was convicted of conspiracy to committ murder. basically, his followers took a plee deal to testify against him. so they then testified that charlie planned it and told them to kill those people. these weren’t kids, these were adults capable of making thier own decisions. so they put all the blame on charlie. [/quote]

I know,. But you have to put a lot of guilt on his shoulders too. He rounded up drug addicts and crainwashed them into doing what he wanted. His followers acted as an extension ,much like a soilder that commits. Genocode.

I still think Charles Manson is a brilliant man who. Could have been something special…if a few things had went right for him in his early years.

He’s a murderer in history now but could have been an influential politician or artist. [/quote]

ya, he did brainwash them, but, adults have to take responsibility for themselves. and while they were young, they were adults. he just puts on a big act now. he acts like hes crazy, when hes anything but crazy. he just likes to be what we made him out to be.

235

And I wouldn’t put it out of chance that Manson has killed people with his own hand. He’s a “bottomed out” kind of guy. So, killing a few hookers or giving an overdose…lacing drugs or something similar is within reason to me at least.

236

ANIMA

Google it. Read, and understand yourself.

237

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:

He’s a murderer in history now but could have been an influential politician or artist. [/quote]

Hitler managed all three.

238

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I’ve written Charles Manson letters before.[/quote]

everyone calls charles manson a murderer. but do they realize, this guy wasn’t convicted of murder, cause he never actually killed anyone. he was convicted of conspiracy to committ murder. basically, his followers took a plee deal to testify against him. so they then testified that charlie planned it and told them to kill those people. these weren’t kids, these were adults capable of making thier own decisions. so they put all the blame on charlie. [/quote]

I know,. But you have to put a lot of guilt on his shoulders too. He rounded up drug addicts and crainwashed them into doing what he wanted. His followers acted as an extension ,much like a soilder that commits. Genocode.

I still think Charles Manson is a brilliant man who. Could have been something special…if a few things had went right for him in his early years.

He’s a murderer in history now but could have been an influential politician or artist. [/quote]

ya, he did brainwash them, but, adults have to take responsibility for themselves. and while they were young, they were adults. he just puts on a big act now. he acts like hes crazy, when hes anything but crazy. he just likes to be what we made him out to be. [/quote]

They were adults and hold responsibility,yes. But, they were drug addicts in the middle of nowhere. Manson knew what he was doing.

And I believe he has autism and a few other afflictions. The dudes mom was a hooker which means he was a trick baby. His forming years were complete toture.

Like I said earlier. He was turned out before he or anyone else had a chance to develop him for the good.

239

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:

He’s a murderer in history now but could have been an influential politician or artist. [/quote]

Hitler managed all three.[/quote]

I always wonder about how the world would be if Hitler had a successful career as an artist.

240

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:

He’s a murderer in history now but could have been an influential politician or artist. [/quote]

Hitler managed all three.[/quote]

I always wonder about how the world would be if Hitler had a successful career as an artist.[/quote]

No you don’t.