As such, I can’t possibly imagine what a hand-covered cooch has to do with anything other than a way to flaunt… hard work in the gym.
[/quote]
Sorry Ano, you can’t complain about a hand covered cooch in SAMA if you don’t simultaneously complain about the Figure Athlete of the Day. Sorry LFMatt (you know I love you, man), that goes for you too when you cited “porn” as being a negative way back yonder near the beginning of this thread.[/quote]
Honestly, I come straight to the forums nowadays. Haven’t checked the main site in some time, I think.
That being said, unless the figure athlete images flirt with other posters, send provocative images via PM and have been involved in at least one public embarrassment to the site in recent memory, then I’m not so sure it’s an apples to apples comparison. My GUESS as to what makes the Vixens so appealing to many is that you can actually communicate with them. The flirtatious interactions with the person behind the slutty image and the sense of hopeful possibilities that entails is, I’d think, what makes all of that so appealing. THAT’S what’s been causing all the problems for the Admin, methinks. People getting in to deep with that fantasy and then bugging the mods for help covering their tracks.
And, I’m not even against hand covered cooches are these parts to begin with… just as long as the person to whom both the hand and the cooch are attached is willing to admit that the pic is what it is.
As such, I can’t possibly imagine what a hand-covered cooch has to do with anything other than a way to flaunt… hard work in the gym.
[/quote]
Sorry Ano, you can’t complain about a hand covered cooch in SAMA if you don’t simultaneously complain about the Figure Athlete of the Day. Sorry LFMatt (you know I love you, man), that goes for you too when you cited “porn” as being a negative way back yonder near the beginning of this thread.
[/quote]
Come on, Push.
Fuck this bullshit that it was women who ruined SAMA. How about the men who posted with wash cloths, hands or just a BLACK RECTANGLE over their dangly bits?
[/quote]
Wouldn’t that depend on the size of the black box?
I mean, if you cover your penis, you aren’t officially naked anymore if you’re a guy.
You may be repulsive, but not officially naked.[/quote]
And last I recall T-Vix didn’t have explicit nudity. THAT is my point.
ALSO…my post has been edited by mods. No argument implied with Push. In full agreement with his statement and subsequently removed reference pic.
Fuck this bullshit that it was women who ruined SAMA. How about the men who posted with wash cloths, hands or just a BLACK RECTANGLE over their dangly bits?
Edit: fuck. Removed Push’s pic and my reference to it. i agree with you Push and was pointing out that the chick was far from a “figure athlete”.[/quote]
Ah, yes, the men are just as guilty as well, though I don’t really have any problems with them posting their shit just as I never really had any problem with the women here doing the same.
Taking a look at the “figure athletes”… yes, many of them have nice figures, but not all of them are what I would call “athletes”.
“Eye Candy” would be a more appropriate name for that collection.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
It just seemed many were demanding answers when the truth is, the fact that they needed to do something like that at all makes a huge statement.[/quote]
Agreed. There are some people demanding answers so they “don’t make the same mistakes”, but my guess is that it’s a safe bet to assume that most of them know exactly what it was they had done wrong. Or at least have a clue.
When the Admin chime in to explicitly state that they are not going to detail the exact reasons behind their decision making, it begs the question of whether or not those people are actually telling the whole story when they claim ignorance.[/quote]
Wut?[/quote]
Yeah, the first part was phrased awkwardly.
I very much doubt that most of the people who have revoked posting privileges are absolutely clueless as to what it was they had done wrong to deserve their ban, despite what they may claim. I mean, it’s either that or assume that TN arbitrarily banned a large portion of the vocal female population for absolutely no reason.
People who want additional details by claiming to be worried about making the same mistakes should just keep on doing whatever it is they have been, because obviously doing that allowed them to survive a squash from the banhammer.
Matt was absolutely correct when he said you could read into the limited responses from TN and piece some things together for yourself.
[quote]anonym wrote:
People who want additional details by claiming to be worried about making the same mistakes should just keep on doing whatever it is they have been, because obviously doing that allowed them to survive a squash from the banhammer.
Matt was absolutely correct when he said you could read into the limited responses from TN and piece some things together for yourself.[/quote]
Yes, yes, yes. While it would be fun to know the details for gossips sake, if you’re still allowed to post, you’re not the problem.
When the Admin chime in to explicitly state that they are not going to detail the exact reasons behind their decision making, it begs the question of whether or not those people are actually telling the whole story when they claim ignorance.[/quote]
LowfatMatt, Can you tell us, do people get a warning before they are cut off or do they just wake up one morning unable to post?
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Will topics such as Dumb Bitch Stories be tolerated on GAL, assuming no raunchy pics or explicit sexual discussion?[/quote]
Bump
…My GUESS as to what makes the Vixens so appealing to many is that you can actually communicate with them.
[/quote]
Absolutely. NTTAWWT.
Yes, and I know from personal experience it doesn’t always end at just a fantasy. I’ve met several women from here and had a lot of fun. NTTAWWT (Am not doing it now FWIW)
There IS obviously something wrong with drama and scandal that tears committed relationships apart, I agree.
I don’t think the person is obligated to admit to anything other than that the pic is of them. Big deal.
[/quote]
x2 + infinity.
[quote]anonym wrote:
People who want additional details by claiming to be worried about making the same mistakes should just keep on doing whatever it is they have been, because obviously doing that allowed them to survive a squash from the banhammer.
Matt was absolutely correct when he said you could read into the limited responses from TN and piece some things together for yourself.[/quote]
Yes, yes, yes. While it would be fun to know the details for gossips sake, if you’re still allowed to post, you’re not the problem.[/quote]
Maybe. But who knows if they are done with the deletes.
