
[quote]on edge wrote:
Never mind me, I’m just seeing if I can still post.[/quote]
x2
And, just to make sure that I can still post lolcats… Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them.

[quote]on edge wrote:
Never mind me, I’m just seeing if I can still post.[/quote]
x2
And, just to make sure that I can still post lolcats… Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them.
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Any body else feel bad for those who lost their job, spouse or got humiliated? Not sure who experienced what but that has got to suck. I can understand how Biotest would prefer not to be so involved.[/quote]
Depends who he was.
If you poke another woman more or less out in the open I find it so terribly, terribly hard to muster some sort of sympathy.
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
I do understand your logic though, just disagree especially when Biotest themselves say an SN and password make a member, not an order amount vs. store purchases although no, I can’t prove to you what I’ve bought without scanning Vitamin Shoppe receipts for your review which isn’t happening.[/quote]
I don’t disagree that there are those who choose to buy locally (even though the free shipping and store markups make online ordering typically the best option).
I also don’t disagree that there are some out there with phantom accounts who choose to, for some hazy, awkwardly justified reason, buy from a second account.
But, the argument was that – on the whole – Level 0’s who loiter about the site are just as entitled to answers from the Boss Men because they have unverifiable purchasing histories across the board such that their whining should be taken into consideration just as much as those who clearly DO put their money where their mouths are.
It then spun into the purely Off-Topic posters recruiting a slew of customers who prove to be just as loyal and generous with their purchasing as those who place an equal or greater emphasis in the On-Topic forums… when a quick gander at nearly ALL of the Off-Topic sites will show that this is NOT the case.
Of course, it was more a trolling comment than anything else, but I’m happy to argue 'til I’m blue in the fingers. Because what happens on this site is serious business.[/quote]
Serious business is certainly better than gaycats.
You have a point on competitive pricing when buying direct, however, convenience is important. My supp and grocery stores share a parking lot and it makes hitting both easy. As I go through both food and supps, I add to my shopping list and the system is pretty streamlined, easily facilitated and worth the extra cost. Usually stores match web prices anyways.
According to the owners of this site members are members regardless of level and member opinions count. As far as I’m concerned, that is that.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
Never mind me, I’m just seeing if I can still post.[/quote]
x2
And, just to make sure that I can still post lolcats… Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them. [/quote]
I beat you too, dude.
Was there anyone recently banned that participates in the core forums of the site?
As far as I can tell only SAMA sex workers were banned.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
I like how this thread has turned out. Yesterday we were all up and arms. Today we’re swinging!! yayyy!!!
Typical thread derailment.
Lol[/quote]
[/quote]
On its way. Have you managed to get the bartender’s phone number?
[/quote]
already banged her in the menz room - you think I’m brand new at this shit?[/quote]
Ha well … you should have waited till we got married. You would have made a cool 10k
[quote]imhungry wrote:
Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them. [/quote]
As with most things in life, “no” actually means “yes”.
So says my attorney, anyway.
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
According to the owners of this site members are members regardless of level and member opinions count. As far as I’m concerned, that is that.[/quote]
True.
I would not wish to anger the hovering banhammers by suggesting otherwise any more than I already have.
Or maybe, just maybe, bitches in panties having nothing to do with “hardcore” lifting were hampering the site and biotests growth as explained by Biotest and removing the anchor allows the company to return to its roots while spreading its message (and products) more effectively.
Hmmmm? Maybe?
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
Never mind me, I’m just seeing if I can still post.[/quote]
x2
And, just to make sure that I can still post lolcats… Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them. [/quote]
I beat you too, dude.[/quote]
That would explain my sore dick.
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
Never mind me, I’m just seeing if I can still post.[/quote]
x2
And, just to make sure that I can still post lolcats… Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them. [/quote]
I beat you too, dude.[/quote]
At… what?
I didn’t realize we were fighting.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Was there anyone recently banned that participates in the core forums of the site?
As far as I can tell only SAMA sex workers were banned.[/quote]
The girls that had been banned had logs in the Powerful Women Board. Most of them frequented the PW more than SAMA and only a couple hardly posted there.
It wasn’t only about Sama, you know? Some of us do some serious shit around here.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
Never mind me, I’m just seeing if I can still post.[/quote]
x2
And, just to make sure that I can still post lolcats… Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them. [/quote]
I beat you too, dude.[/quote]
That would explain my sore dick.[/quote]
Nope.
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Or maybe, just maybe, bitches in panties having nothing to do with “hardcore” lifting were hampering the site and biotests growth as explained by Biotest and removing the anchor allows the company to return to its roots while spreading its message (and products) more effectively.
Hmmmm? Maybe?[/quote]
Stop overanalyzing
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Was there anyone recently banned that participates in the core forums of the site?
As far as I can tell only SAMA sex workers were banned.[/quote]
Ouch…I mean…OUCH!
[quote]anonym wrote:
I think the leveling system is fairly useless and I don’t think anything has really come of it other than to encourage people to buy more in the hopes that a higher level increases their reputation on the site. I’d rather they did away with it, but when it comes down to determining WHO to listen to, the people who clearly contribute the bucks to the business should be the ones the owners feel most accountable to.
THAT was my original point. The silly attempts at proving such a basic concept wrong is what kept it all going.[/quote]
I think the idea of some sort of rating system just isn’t needed here. You can tell who knows their shit and who doesn’t in these forums. I find the “bodybuilding forum clique” bullshit to be way worse than the buyer rating system.
I also do wonder why so many seem to have more than one account here. If you are posting things that damaging, maybe you should stop.
If that is all you were griping, I can agree with that.
It just seemed many were demanding answers when the truth is, the fact that they needed to do something like that at all makes a huge statement.
I’ve been here since 2000 regardless of what my join date and this never happened before.
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Or maybe, just maybe, bitches in panties having nothing to do with “hardcore” lifting were hampering the site and biotests growth as explained by Biotest and removing the anchor allows the company to return to its roots while spreading its message (and products) more effectively.
Hmmmm? Maybe?[/quote]
I believe it was already established that those are known as “progress pics”.
As such, I can’t possibly imagine what a hand-covered cooch has to do with anything other than a way to flaunt… hard work in the gym.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
Never mind me, I’m just seeing if I can still post.[/quote]
x2
And, just to make sure that I can still post lolcats… Obviously, there’s a lot of people requesting them. [/quote]
I beat you too, dude.[/quote]
At… what?
I didn’t realize we were fighting.[/quote]
At in b4 gaycats, see edgys butthurt a page or two back.
And you’re in western PA? Like Altoona kinda?
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Was there anyone recently banned that participates in the core forums of the site?
As far as I can tell only SAMA sex workers were banned.[/quote]
No. Some of the ladies from PW who never posted anywhere else were banned.
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
I like how this thread has turned out. Yesterday we were all up and arms. Today we’re swinging!! yayyy!!!
Typical thread derailment.
Lol[/quote]
[/quote]
On its way. Have you managed to get the bartender’s phone number?
[/quote]
already banged her in the menz room - you think I’m brand new at this shit?[/quote]
Ha well … you should have waited till we got married. You would have made a cool 10k
[/quote]
just being with you is worth way more than any amount of money~