facepalm the paper is just to show that even though they were taking an enormous amount of anastrozole their SHBG was not severely affected. It is also to show you that there is literature on the subject, that you were unaware of because you claimed there wasn’t any.
There is no paper describing healthy levels of E2 of men on testosterone because it hasn’t been studied, not much in the field of TRT is, they just figured out 10 years ago it doesn’t give you prostate cancer. So I am not sure why you keep touting that, YOU are the one claiming that aromatase inhibition is bad for men, so YOU are the one that needs to prove your claim, not me.
Breast cancer is not treated with testosterone alone, an aromatase inhibitor is also used.
I have went over this 100 times, it is sad that you don’t even understand this basic simple concept so you keep bringing it up, even though I have addressed it multiple times. They give men estrogen to shut down their HPTA. Large dose, short time period. It is not estrogen therapy, as you are implying.
This is not true, because most of the studies on TRT affecting prostate cancer and cardiovascular risk are done with low dosages, or creams or pellets and TT levels do not rise as much, and they do not increase Free T as much either, therefore there is not enough raw material for the aroma to create high levels of E2. So I am not sure what you are trying to extrapolate here, but it makes no sense.
What are you saying here? We have men and women on TRT, have seen exactly what happens. It doesn’t matter if your body makes E2 from exogenous testosterone, or from endogenous, it is all the same. Once the testosterone is cleaved form the ester your body cannot tell the difference. So again, you are making up stuff.
Yes I have been trying to explain to you over and over how important E2 is in protecting men and women from cardiovascular issues, bone resorption and brain function, what does this have to do with you sayin anastrozole is bad for you? This again highlights your confusion on the subject, you imply that if someone takes any amount of anastrozole their E2 will crash, and this is not the case.
You are confused again on the last point, I have posted literature agreeing with the fact that low estrogen in men is bad. This has nothing to do with, and does not strengthen your argument at all. You are arguing that aroma inhibition, regardless of E2 levels, is bad. When someone is hypogonadal they do not have E2 because they do not have enough raw material (testosterone) to make it. So they accumulate visceral fat and with it tons of aromatase enzymes. So when you introduce higher levels of T into the blood stream, those aromatase enzymes get to work and make a ton of E2. Labs before TRT tell you absolutely nothing, you start at 0 when you start injecting. So again, you are confused.