[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
While we’re on the UK’s justice system:
But, clearly, the case of the bigamous speeder is more important.
Shall we start discussing Muslim rape jihad against infidel women in the UK? I heard there’s one in Sweden too.
[/quote]
Wait. This guy raped a woman?
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
While we’re on the UK’s justice system:
But, clearly, the case of the bigamous speeder is more important.
Shall we start discussing Muslim rape jihad against infidel women in the UK? I heard there’s one in Sweden too.
Wait. This guy raped a woman?[/quote]
No. This guy did:
Ah…I’m all confused now.
[quote]lixy wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
While we’re on the UK’s justice system:
But, clearly, the case of the bigamous speeder is more important.
Shall we start discussing Muslim rape jihad against infidel women in the UK? I heard there’s one in Sweden too.
Wait. This guy raped a woman?
No. This guy did:
Ah…I’m all confused now.[/quote]
Did he have a harem too?
[quote]lixy wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
While we’re on the UK’s justice system:
But, clearly, the case of the bigamous speeder is more important.
Shall we start discussing Muslim rape jihad against infidel women in the UK? I heard there’s one in Sweden too.
Wait. This guy raped a woman?
No. This guy did:
Ah…I’m all confused now.[/quote]
Your confusion is unsurprising, given your religion. After all, Mohammed pretty much blessed the practice of rape when he divided up the widows of Khaibar amongst his men after slaughtering 6-700 of their husbands. Still, we musn’t let a spurious rape charge or two distract us from the epidemic in Sweden:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=08C88AE6-74B3-4627-B42C-63E068365F58
Where do you think the Swedish couple got the idea for accusing the cab driver of rape?
I don’t see what’s hard to understand here guys. Obviously all “muzzies” who do bad things are one in the same! (we’ll ignore anything that doesn’t fit into our worldview).
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
I don’t see what’s hard to understand here guys. Obviously all “muzzies” who do bad things are one in the same! (we’ll ignore anything that doesn’t fit into our worldview). [/quote]
Does shooting laser beams out of your eyes qualify as a “bad thing”?
[quote]Chushin wrote:
lixy wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
I don’t see what’s hard to understand here guys. Obviously all “muzzies” who do bad things are one in the same! (we’ll ignore anything that doesn’t fit into our worldview).
Does shooting laser beams out of your eyes qualify as a “bad thing”?
Please explain why you broke your word and are posting again. [/quote]
RJ gave me a break by allowing me to make it a double or nothing deal at $30/barrel. Quite magnanimous of him really.
Why do you ask?
I wonder how likely it is that the judge would have let him retain his license if he said he had to see his kids, or a work obligation, or, hell, even just went in to beg the judge not to take his license away…
sounds to me like something that happens all the fucking time (hell, almost any traffic ticket can get knocked down to a 0 point offense if you plea bargain)… but let’s make a big deal out of this case because it shows “polygamous sympathy” and indicates that our society is going to change overnight.
Oddly, this comes from the same poster who described prop 8 as “a silver lining”… funny, no?
[quote]lixy wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
I don’t see what’s hard to understand here guys. Obviously all “muzzies” who do bad things are one in the same! (we’ll ignore anything that doesn’t fit into our worldview).
Does shooting laser beams out of your eyes qualify as a “bad thing”?[/quote]
This is an excellent question that merits further discussion.
What really bugs me is whether or not those who already have eye-beams are or are not secret Muslims. Also, why won’t the liberal media cover Obama’s laser-beam eye power?
[quote]pookie wrote:
lixy wrote:
And Pookie: Bite Me!
Sorry, my religion precludes me from biting people who eat their own underwear.
As for the topic at hand, I think polygamy is one of the root cause of the high incidence of radical fanatics among muslims.
Human births are very close to 50/50 among boys and girls. Any societal arrangement that gives more than one woman exclusively to each man will mean that a lot of men will find themselves without mates.
If all the successful males have four wives, then you have the bottom 75% of men who are alone and can’t reproduce. That gives you a very large pool of “losers” who will be angry, and most likely very easy to entice into doing violence to others. Especially if you promise them 72 virgins in exchange for giving their lives doing so.
Want to reduce muslim terrorism? Give each man a wife and a chance at a family and quit that stupid “virgins for martyrs” crap and they’ll mellow out within a generation.
[/quote]
We should give them sluts right now. Who wants a virgin any damn way? That’s the most boring lay you can get is a virgin. I’d prefer a woman who can move and knows how to work it. Virgins don’t know shit.
On the other hand, what nobody told the muslims is that those 72 virgins are men and they only pitch, they don’t catch.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
lixy wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
I don’t see what’s hard to understand here guys. Obviously all “muzzies” who do bad things are one in the same! (we’ll ignore anything that doesn’t fit into our worldview).
Does shooting laser beams out of your eyes qualify as a “bad thing”?
Please explain why you broke your word and are posting again. [/quote]
The rip cord on the suicide bomb broke?
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
While we’re on the UK’s justice system:
But, clearly, the case of the bigamous speeder is more important.
Shall we start discussing Muslim rape jihad against infidel women in the UK? I heard there’s one in Sweden too.
Wait. This guy raped a woman?
No. This guy did:
Ah…I’m all confused now.
Your confusion is unsurprising, given your religion. After all, Mohammed pretty much blessed the practice of rape when he divided up the widows of Khaibar amongst his men after slaughtering 6-700 of their husbands. Still, we musn’t let a spurious rape charge or two distract us from the epidemic in Sweden:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=08C88AE6-74B3-4627-B42C-63E068365F58
Where do you think the Swedish couple got the idea for accusing the cab driver of rape?
[/quote]
Well it’s the women’s fault you know. They must have been showing some ankle.
[quote]pat wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
lixy wrote:
While we’re on the UK’s justice system:
But, clearly, the case of the bigamous speeder is more important.
Shall we start discussing Muslim rape jihad against infidel women in the UK? I heard there’s one in Sweden too.
Wait. This guy raped a woman?
No. This guy did:
Ah…I’m all confused now.
Your confusion is unsurprising, given your religion. After all, Mohammed pretty much blessed the practice of rape when he divided up the widows of Khaibar amongst his men after slaughtering 6-700 of their husbands. Still, we musn’t let a spurious rape charge or two distract us from the epidemic in Sweden:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=08C88AE6-74B3-4627-B42C-63E068365F58
Where do you think the Swedish couple got the idea for accusing the cab driver of rape?
Well it’s the women’s fault you know. They must have been showing some ankle.[/quote]
I like how he goes right back into victim mode after someone posts something inconvenient to his “religion of peace” crap. Islam: blaming the victim since Mohammed.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
…
Hell yes, polygamy is a far superior method for providing for the needs of a family than a traditional family homes. A harem is precisely what every man needs. I cannot help that you cannot escape the feminist western way of thinking about it.[/quote]
2x