Why is it that the reason Conservatives hate Obama because he is Black? Why can’t the argument be we hate him because he is White?[/quote]
I thought it was because he was a Muslim? [/quote]
Lets also add that he was born in Kenya…
[/quote]
Donald Trump thinks so. We’ve done the birther movement before, but…
I know, I know (left wing, liberal lies, socialism, etc) [/quote]
I think Zecarlo got my humor. I guess it went over your head H.
[/quote]
I assumed the … we’re in addition to being Muslim. My bad [/quote]
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I saw a huge advantage on taxes to be that Corp . It was the write offs . [/quote]
You got to take advantage of the same deductions when you filed sch c verse an 1120S.
Absolutely there are tax advantages to forming an S-Corp rather than remain a sole proprietorship, however those advantages don’t lie in additional deductions. It is the transfer of capital that makes the rubber meet the road. [/quote]
I personally think the best way to do way with any disparity or VIA you perceived disparity would be a tax code any one could understand .
I know that would not be good for a person that has spent years and thousands if not hundreds of thousands to learn about that mess they call a tax code
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I saw a huge advantage on taxes to be that Corp . It was the write offs . [/quote]
You got to take advantage of the same deductions when you filed sch c verse an 1120S.
Absolutely there are tax advantages to forming an S-Corp rather than remain a sole proprietorship, however those advantages don’t lie in additional deductions. It is the transfer of capital that makes the rubber meet the road. [/quote]
I personally think the best way to do way with any disparity or VIA you perceived disparity would be a tax code any one could understand .
I know that would not be good for a person that has spent years and thousands if not hundreds of thousands to learn about that mess they call a tax code
[/quote]
Anyone can understand it. It, however takes time and effort to understand it. Shit, the entire code is available on the internet.
We live in this thing called society. And we are human, we can’t all know everything all the time. I hire plumbers because I didn’t take the time to learn how to run pipe. The plumber hires me, because he didn’t take the time to learn to fill out a 1040…
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I know that would not be good for a person that has spent years and thousands if not hundreds of thousands to learn about that mess they call a tax code [/quote]
Oh and, most of us earn back what we paid in tuition in between 4 years to a decade’s time, so…
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Anyone can understand it. It, however takes time and effort to understand it. Shit, the entire code is available on the internet.
We live in this thing called society. And we are human, we can’t all know everything all the time. I hire plumbers because I didn’t take the time to learn how to run pipe. The plumber hires me, because he didn’t take the time to learn to fill out a 1040…[/quote]
My point is it should be simple enough so there is no disparity hidden in it’s massive text
Criticizing him for the job he has done is one thing but I think when you start getting into the whole birther matter is when you see racism rear its head.
You realize of course that Hillary and Bill started the birther movement during the primary. Don’t blame that on republican “racism”. There is far more racism on the Democrat plantation.
No “great differences or inconsistencies” hidden in the fabric of the tax code continuum?
Maybe they are concealed near the event horizon of a loop hole, so our sensors can’t pick them up. [/quote]
No, because the idea that person 1 has an advantage due to the tax code, that person 2 doesn’t have is bunk.
Both people play by the same rule book, the IRC. If person 1 is in a position to do action A which falls under code section X, that doesn’t mean person 2 can’t do the same. The option is available to them. Look at it like this, we all have the opportunity to play for the Yankees, but we don’t all have the ability to keep up with Derek Jeter. Now it is unfortunate, but that doesn’t mean the rules should be changed so that I’m playing short stop in Yankee stadium does it? No, it means my situation is different than his, and I have to adjust my approach.
The IRC isn’t all that complex, just takes time and experience. Is it perfectly fair? No, not at all, but there isn’t one single thing in the world that is… There can’t be. People who have zero understanding about what they are talking about, read shitty article written by people that don’t have a clue either, read facebook pictures and think they have an “AH HA” moment, when in reality their perception is so off, they look like cannon fodder to those of us that do.
There is a reason I don’t run my mouth about foreign policy… No one feels the need to sit back and listen when it comes to the tax code however. Arm chair experts all over.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
My point is it should be simple enough so there is no disparity hidden in it’s massive text
[/quote]
There isn’t. Not only is there no “disparity”, it isn’t hidden anywhere. [/quote]
I feel so much better now , I think we should allow the IRS to rule the world
Or you do not know the definition of disparity
I am betting on the second [/quote]
Yeah, that’s it. Funny.
Coming from someone who doesn’t even have an infantile grasp of the vocabulary that goes along with the topic they are trying to make assertions on, snide comments about my understanding of word’s denotation are cute.
No “great differences or inconsistencies” hidden in the fabric of the tax code continuum?
Maybe they are concealed near the event horizon of a loop hole, so our sensors can’t pick them up. [/quote]
Secondly, if one were to make the argument that there were a disparity, one would be hard pressed not to say that higher earners are the ones at the significant disadvantage when it comes to taxation compared to lower earners.
This makes people’s head explode because “dat millionaries and billionaries” bullshit you read in the paper and hear form politicians when ever there is a recession or depression.
I was attempting to make fun of Pitt’s use of the word “disparities”, while implying that the tax code was as vast and ungrokkable as the space-time continuum. “Event horizon of a loop hole”? Come on.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
You accountants are far too literal.
I was attempting to make fun of Pitt’s use of the word “disparities”, while implying that the tax code was as vast and ungrokkable as the space-time continuum. “Event horizon of a loop hole”? Come on. [/quote]
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
You accountants are far too literal.
I was attempting to make fun of Pitt’s use of the word “disparities”, while implying that the tax code was as vast and ungrokkable as the space-time continuum. “Event horizon of a loop hole”? Come on. [/quote]
Tax is a fun free zone![/quote]
Next you’ll tell me that I can’t joke about death, either.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
You accountants are far too literal.
I was attempting to make fun of Pitt’s use of the word “disparities”, while implying that the tax code was as vast and ungrokkable as the space-time continuum. “Event horizon of a loop hole”? Come on. [/quote]
Tax is a fun free zone![/quote]
Next you’ll tell me that I can’t joke about death, either. [/quote]
Ah, if you can’t joke about death what can you joke about?
[/quote]