US Presidential Election Predictions

[dt79]

You seem to be the only one in the world who assumes this and even if I reeeaaally try to use your context:

@ntrojnky

These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!

The part in bold nullifies it.

It’s a very simple thing to understand. The military(I doubt they were even there) will control the crowd through non-violent means, BUT, if looting starts, an exchange of shots will occur.

How much mental gymnastics does one need to be able to interpret this any different? Obviously he was just making an empty threat and I didn’t take him seriously but to jump through hoops to reinterpret something like this is just patently absurd.

@ntrojnky

So you can believe the guy who wrote the words as to the intent, or you can believe the media who lies about the intent of his words on a daily basis to further the orange man bad narrative.

I believe he realized he said something too stupid and decided to backtrack by offering a rationale that made no sense at all.

@ntrojnky

I get that liberals want to read into it differently, but they also still think he hasn’t denounced white supremacy, and the link I provided above clearly shows that he has, numerous times. And even with that proof out there, they still claim it.

Oh come on: I’ve been defending even the dumbest things he’s ever said during his Presidency:

“Gibberish that wasn’t really gibberish”:

@dt79

Man, I’ve even broken down one of the dumbest things he’s said throughout his term and it was nothing like the media was trying to make it out to be:

“Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible.”

He’s saying:

1. Nuclear powerful. Trump smart.
2. He’s the smartest man on the planet but he has to prove his smartestness all the time because the fake news media is calling him dumb because he’s not a democrat.
3. When Iran make nuclear during Iran-Irag War very powerful(1980, 1981 start make big nuclear), Uncle Trump from MIT foresaw the political power they would have today and he was also very smart because of smart Trump genes, very good ones. (2016 -35yrs = 1981) Trump smart.
4. The other 3 countries, now 4 are being held “hostage”, i.e, prisoners by the Iran deal because of shitty terms he doesn’t specify but he’s from Wharton so he’s smart.
5. Women smarter than men but Iranians and Persians, both separate peoples, find out only 150 years later but Trump still smartestest.
6. The previous administration lacked negotiation powers they think Hilary woman less smart because woman so they got shitty terms from Iran and the Persians are also in it somewhere in the fine print since they’re separate countries and Trump really smart.

I think I should have a little, tiny bit of credibility just from doing this when I say Trump didn’t literally mean “stand by”.

“Stand back and stand by”:

@dt79

You all know Trump says dumb shit and mangles the English language. Go listen to the entire exchange and everything he said and think about context. In terms of probability, I don’t even think he even knows the meaning of “stand by”.

Logically, how can one come to the conclusion that Trump can say “I’ll condemn anything you want” and then tell the people he’s condemning to “stand by”? Seriously? Does it even make sense?

“Good people on both sides”

@dt79

Just look at the blatant dishonesty here:

Reporter : “I do love Thomas Jefferson.”

Trump : "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?

"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists – because they should be condemned totally . But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.

“Now, in the other group also , you had some fine people . But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets, and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group.”

Reporter : “Sir, I just didn’t understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I just don’t understand what you were saying.”

Seriously, what is this nonsense? How can you even be gainfully employed if you can’t even understand something as basic as this?

EVEN HIS INFAMOUS SPEECH ABOUT MEXICANS:

@dt79

Let me start off by saying I would never vote for Trump unless he was running against Jimmy Fallon. And only because he’s way funnier.

Now, Trump was clearly referring to Mexicans who were crossing the border illegally , which already, by definition, makes them criminals .

And he said:

“When Mexico sends its people , they’re not sending their best”.

You can easily see here that he’s referencing the events that happened before involving the Cuban government, which were depicted in the movie Scarface , which was brought up earlier, by implying that it’s the Mexican government throwing over their criminals, because normal Mexican crossing the border legally clearly aren’t doing so at the behest of the government.

“ They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists…”

Of course, this is bullshit and clearly meant to rile up the crowd regarding illegal immigration and trying to convince them that he will get back at the Mexican government by making them “pay for the wall”, which he’s obviously never going to do.

And he even goes as far as to say:

“And some, I assume, are good people.”

@dt79

It reflects the ICE stats IIRC(excluding children, of course). Everyone had committed an illegal act by crossing the border illegally. They had some drug dealers, some rape reports (which means unsubstantiated) and around 10% were granted political asylum amongst those detained.

It should be quite telling when I’m simply unable to defend his tweet other than he was just telling people how big his dick is.