UK Should Have a Muslim PM

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
41

Here is an article which shows why the people of Britain have no other choice than the BNP if they want to see the issue of immigration addressed. On the EU and immigration all the other parties have abandoned leadership on the issue. All they will do is give hollow promises that they will promptly ignore once they are returned to power. ie Labour promised a refferendum on the EU constitution in their last general election manifesto, then shortly after he became PM Gordon Brown sneaked over to Lisbon and signed Britain on to EU constitution without the promised refferendum.

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/05/migrationwatchuk-condemns-all-other-parties-for-silence-on-immigration/

MigrationwatchUK Condemns All Other Parties for Silence on Immigration

well-respected MigrationwatchUK think tank, which claims to have a working relationship with elements of both the Labour and Conservative parties, has condemned all other political parties except the BNP for not discussing immigration.

â??The three main parties are once again ignoring widespread public concern about the number of immigrants allowed into the UK in their manifestos for next weekâ??s European elections,â?? MigrationwatchUKâ??s Sir Andrew Green has said in a press release.

â??An analysis of the partiesâ?? manifestos on this highly sensitive issue â?? consistently rated among the top three concerns of the public for a number of years â?? finds no hint of any desire for an open and frank discussion, let alone any meaningful commitment to bring down the highest immigration levels in our history,â?? Sir Green said.

â??Only last week a YouGov poll showed that more than 7 out of 10 adults want immigration cut by over 80 percent.

â??Yet once again the main parties prefer to duck the issue and offer only platitudes. Either they simply do not understand the level of public concern out there â?? or they are displaying a wilful disregard of the public mood,â?? Sir Green said.

The Migrationwatch assessment on the Labour Party manifesto is that while there is undoubtedly a major reform of the visa system, â??there is no sign of any significant reduction in numbers.

â??The description of it as â??Australian styleâ?? is misleading,â?? said Sir Green.

â??The Australians start from a limit and select within it. The new British system has no limits and is not intended to have any. Indeed it might well weaken immigration control rather than strengthen it,â?? Sir Green said.

â??There is no reference to the UKâ??s population. Ministers have said that they will prevent the population of the UK reaching 70 million from the present 61 million. That will require a reduction of 75 percent in net immigration. Their own estimate is that measures announced so far will reduce it by about 5 percent.â??

The assessment of the LibDem proposals is that they are â??fine words with a predictable pro-European slant but in need of a reality check. What is their â??coherent approachâ?? to legal immigration from outside the EU when demography and circumstances differ enormously? And how does this square with national control of immigration? Their manifesto contains no sign of any serious policy for immigration,â?? he continued.

â??The Conservative manifesto is cursory, indeed condescending, on this key issue â?? a single paragraph in a document of 28 pages stating that their MEPs will oppose harmonisation of policy on asylum, visas and immigration while supporting EU co-operation where it adds value. They say these sensitive matters are best dealt with as policies for national governmentsâ?? competence and control.â??

The British National Party is the only party to address the immigration issue squarely and honestly, and in line with the issues about which the public are concerned.

Voters have a choice between the other parties, which offer in MigrationwatchUKâ??s words, â??meaningless platitudesâ??, or for the BNP, which offers a reasonable, sensible and correct approach to the immigration issue.

To read about the BNPâ??s immigration policy, click here.

42

It’s hardly surprising an anti-immigration organisation would support the anti-immigration policies of the BNP.

Have you ever seen a BNP rally in real life?

43

And this is what Migrationwatch UK thinks of the BNP:

It is not for nothing that the BNP received 800,000 votes in the recent elections and the UK Independence Party â?? which also has a strong policy on immigration â?? did remarkably well. Unless the major parties get a grip on this problem and do so soon, the extremists of the BNP will make hay and the tranquillity of our society will be placed at serious risk. The time for decisive action has arrived.

44

[quote]Yolked Up wrote:
After centuries of attrocities commited aganst blacks by the hands of white imperialsits Obama has become the first black president.

Pakistanis still experience discrimination by white jews and indians within britain. There is no tolerance. It’s disgusting

So In the same way I think the UK should have a pakistani PM, this way it is a sure sign that Britain too is heading in the right direction. It will be a great sign that Britain has become a true multicultural society, rather than the pseudosecular hellhole it is currently. [/quote]

Great thread, OP!

My only question is, after Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Rowan Williams, and Prince Charles, how much more Islamic can your government get? I mean, isn’t it time to declare victory and go home?

Some of we whites are aware of all of the Muslim slavery of blacks AND Europeans, and how it easily dwarfed the trafficking of black slaves by Europeans, and about how it continues even to this day in most (if not all) Muslim countries. Others will continue to beat their breasts and fall victim to this white guilt crap that you ingrate Muslims continue to spew even as you flee the Islamic hell-holes of your birth. Lixy is another like you on this forum - a pathetic Arab (though you are a wanna-be Arab) whiner living in the West and projecting all of Islamdom’s shortcoming onto us.

45

[quote]Yolked Up wrote:
… They have fascist leanings, outrageous policies and appeal only to some of the uneducated LAZY dole scroungers who know nothing about real politics or economics and are just looking to point the finger and blame others for their own lack of success in life which is entirely their own fault.
[/quote]

Tu quoque.

Some consider running around a fallen rock in Mecca and banging their heads towards it several times a day in an attempt to be just like the Arabs to be “serious business.” For my part, I don’t see what Allah has ever done for me or anyone else, so count me out.

46

[quote]eigieinhamr wrote:
It’s hardly surprising an anti-immigration organisation would support the anti-immigration policies of the BNP.

Have you ever seen a BNP rally in real life?[/quote]

I don’t attend political rally’s. I stay away from crowds. Especially a group that would be a target of government perpetrated or sanctioned violence.

47

[quote]eigieinhamr wrote:
And this is what Migrationwatch UK thinks of the BNP:

It is not for nothing that the BNP received 800,000 votes in the recent elections and the UK Independence Party â?? which also has a strong policy on immigration â?? did remarkably well. Unless the major parties get a grip on this problem and do so soon, the extremists of the BNP will make hay and the tranquillity of our society will be placed at serious risk. The time for decisive action has arrived.[/quote]

Isn’t democracy a bitch. All of the blame for the rise of the BNP lies squarely upon the establishment parties with Labour being the worst of the worst but closely followed by the traitorous Tories. It is hypocritical to blame the BNP for making hay out of the state of affairs that the mainstream parties have created.

The powers that be (ie Rupert Murdoch who owns the Sun newspaper and FOX news) are really scared of the BNP because they don’t own them. They are the only party that isn’t owned by corporate masters. UKIP keeps getting pushed as an alternative to the BNP but the reality is UKIP is a front organisation intended to divert support from any party that will do something about the EU and immigration.

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/05/the-“free-press”-is-not-free-but-a-biased-propaganda-channel/

The Times (and The Sun) is owned by News International Ltd, which in turn is owned by Rupert Murdochâ??s News Corporation. Mr Murdoch is an Australian-born American citizen whose close dealings with Labour and Tory politicians, including Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and David Cameron are a matter of public record.

Mr Murdochâ??s The Sun newspaper once famously claimed that it had â??won the electionâ?? for John Major in 1992 for the Tories, but in the elections since then, The Sun has supported Tony Blair and the Labour Party. In return for the Labour government changing the law on media ownership and market share, The Sun has, under the orders of Rupert Murdoch, propagandised New Labour in every election since 1995. In 1995, while Leader of the Opposition, Mr Blair disclosed in Commons Register of Interests that he has been a personal guest of Mr Murdoch, having been flown to meet in Hayman Island.

In the period between September 2002 and April 2005, Mr Blair and Mr Murdoch spoke no less than six times. Three of these conversations took place in the nine days leading up to the Iraq war, including on the evening of the invasion.

The timing of these conversations indicates strongly that Mr Murdoch was informed of the plans to launch the Iraq war before even the British Parliament, the British people and those British soldiers sent to fight it.

In August 2008, Tory leader David Cameron accepted free flights to hold private talks and attend private parties with Mr Murdoch on his yacht, the Rosehearty. The Conservative leader has declared in the Commons register of interests he accepted a private plane provided by Murdochâ??s son-in-law, public relations guru, Matthew Freud. The gift of travel in the Gulfstream IV private jet was valued at around £30,000. Others guests attending the â??social eventsâ?? included Labourâ??s Lord Mandelson, the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and co-chairman of Americaâ??s NBC Universal, Ben Silverman.

To give you some idea of how bad UKIP is their party boss Nigel Farrage has claimed over two million pounds in expenses from the EU. Farrage has absolutely no intention whatsoever of seperating himself from the EU tit.

Two of UKIP’s representatives that they intend to send to represent Britain in the EU parliament aren’t British citizens one isn’t even a British resident. One is a Sri Lanken who was turned down by the pro EU Liberal Democrats the other is an Argentinian who lives in Spain.

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/05/ukip’s-“british”-euro-candidates-a-sri-lankan-and-an-argentinean-living-in-spain/

The scandal-ridden UKIP party, still reeling under the revelations that its leader Nigel Farage has swindled claimed more than £2 million in expenses, has now been exposed as a thoroughly non-British party whose candidates include an Argentinian who now resides in and is a citizen of Spain, and a Sri Lankan â?? both of whom are on record as enthusiastic supporters of the European Union.

Mr Farage has had to specially waive his own partyâ??s rules which forbid non-UK nationals from standing for his fake party.

The claim of tranquility is laughable. Edinburgh is the most dangerous city in Europe! There are areas of the country that immigrants have turned into no-go zones if you are white. The neighborhood my father grew up in is one of them. My family never goes into that area now. Labour has done more to cause racial and ethnic disharmoney than any other group. They do it because they see it as a way to garner support from immigrants. Let’s not forget the Pakistanis blowing people up on 7/7 or the attempted nightclub bombings, the Glasgow airport bombing.

If anything the BNP will restore tranquility because they bring back effective policing and remove trouble makers. Since BNP councillors were elected in Nuneaton racist incidents there are down by %50.

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/05/racial-incidents-in-nuneaton-and-bedworth-drop-by-50-since-bnp-councillors-elected/

The number of racial incidents reported in the Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough since the British National Party won its seats on that borough council has dropped by half, according to a report tabled at its latest Social Scrutiny Panel meeting.

â??The Best Value Performance Indicators (BVPI) were amongst the reports,â?? BNP councillor Martyn Findley (pictured) told BNP News. â??The Integrated Performance Report for the period April 2008 to March 2009 was brought before us for scrutiny.

â??It contained the news that racial incidents recorded for the period 2007/2008 stood at 4.14 incidents per 100,000 people. The figure recorded for April 2008 to March 2009 dropped to 1.58 incidents per 100,000 people.

â??This nicely encompasses the period of time that Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council has enjoyed the presence of BNP councillors,â?? Cllr Findley said.

â??By my reckoning the number of racial incidents has fallen by far more than half since BNP councillors were elected to the chamber. Furthermore the Annual Target for 2008/2009 was 8.3 incidents per 100,000 people. The number of racial incidents within the borough is therefore down to less than one fifth of the target.â??

Cllr Findley pointed out that it is commonly claimed on anti-BNP smear leaflets put out by a Communist party front organisation that racial incidents rise when BNP councillors are elected.

â??These recorded facts blow away this myth,â?? he said, adding that a similar trend was shown to have occurred in the Barking and Dagenham borough in London after the BNP breakthrough on that council.

â??I am personally delighted by these figures. One incident is one too many but a reduction of this magnitude shows that we can make a difference,â?? he concluded.