I would again encourage you to look up “Domestic Terrorism.” The writer of the article is fairly inconsequential. The information provided was of the “101” variety and could have been written by any graduate student with a little writing experience and the ability to research.
In short, don’t feel as though you have to listen to her. Look it up for yourself.
[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
I thought some of you would appreciate this out-freaking-rageous bit of stupid drivel[/quote]
You’re right, this thread is idiotic. Take an interview completely out of context, and then try to draw conclusions from it.
Bravo… at least you recognize stupid drivel.
[quote]K2000 wrote:
[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
I thought some of you would appreciate this out-freaking-rageous bit of stupid drivel[/quote]
You’re right, this thread is idiotic. Take an interview completely out of context, and then try to draw conclusions from it.
Bravo… at least you recognize stupid drivel.[/quote]
Nice bit of information you provided there. Oh wait, I see. Nevermind. I thought you might have some actual facts. But you were just vaguely…contributing…nothing.
Mr. Southers withdraws - http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/20/obamas-tsa-nominee-withdraws-amid-political-agenda/
Where do they find these people?
[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
Mr. Southers withdraws - http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/20/obamas-tsa-nominee-withdraws-amid-political-agenda/
Where do they find these people?[/quote]
ummmm… at the FBI and the U.S. homeland security Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE) perhaps?
Sad part is Obama and staff knew about his problems and nominated him anyway. Completely out of touch with reality, but then again they don’t fly commercial do they?
[quote]hedo wrote:
Sad part is Obama and staff knew about his problems and nominated him anyway. Completely out of touch with reality, but then again they don’t fly commercial do they?[/quote]
Nah, they take the train, right?