I’m sure he wouldn’t have let the Shaprio situation go down the way it did, but I’m not sold he wouldn’t have loved Trump too. He certainly would have LOVED Milo. Bannon was on the board when he died… So it isn’t like Andrew didn’t know who he was (and obviously approved.)
DOn’t forget you’re talking about the man who willingly helped set up HuffingtonPost.
Andrew was a provocateur in search of proof, and was always willing to give the left all the rope in the world to hang themselves with.
I don’t think everyone from the New York Times to Wiki calling it a “neo-Nazi hate site” would be anything but joy to Andrew, because he’d simply ask these people to prove their claims and show all the “racist” articles.
It also doesn’t add up that Brietbart is very pro Israel, owned and run by Jewish people, Andrew was Jewish, Pollak is I believe, Shaprio is so on and so forth, and is supposedly the “alt-right” website, which are supposedly “neo-nazis”.
If someone can clear that last part up for me, it would be great.
EDIT: I haven’t purposely gone to theie site since 2012, when I realized with Romney, I needed to step out of my bubble. This is all commentary from reading what OTHERS are saying about it. Not what Ive read there.
Food for thought though… I’ve recently been turned off by the use of “pussy” in that manner, and here is why:
I’ve seen child birth… A “pussy” is arguably the toughest thing I’ve ever seen in my life. Sort of doesn’t make sense to use it in that way. Know what I’m saying?
That doesn’t mean anything - I hate to invoke Godwin’s law but at the start of the 20th century Vienna was, after London, the most diverse city in Europe in terms of ethnicity with one of the largest Jewish communities anywhere. That Viennese diversity didn’t stop a certain Austrian art school dropout to develop his toxic ideology while loitering in Vienna proper.
The crux of my point is - US was built on inclusion, immigration and the concept that, unlike in Europe, someone’s ancestors do not determine whether that person is suitable for a certain job or a position.
If you immigrated the US, you should have known what you were signing up for and you should stop fantasizing about the ways to reverse the dilution of Northern European culture in the US, whatever that means to you, and I have a rough idea what it means.
Racism is at its core a belief that races are not equal.[/quote]
I believe all races are equal but that doesn’t mean they’re all 100% the same. If I point out that there are racial differences in blood pressure, is that a racist statement?
I’ve gone through this pre-election really going to keep this discussion short.
We know through decades of data mass immigration is moving the country left based on the preferences of immigrant voting patterns.
If you have a preference and a vision for America to become a socialist state that by all means continue the status quo. However if you are true to your small government principles, major immigration reform must occur.
That doesn’t mean anything - I hate to invoke Godwin’s law but at the start of the 20th century Vienna was, after London, the most diverse city in Europe in terms of ethnicity with one of the largest Jewish communities anywhere. That Viennese diversity didn’t stop a certain Austrian art school dropout to develop his toxic ideology while loitering in Vienna proper.[/quote]
Hitler!!!
Setting aside that I have no idea where you got the “suitable for a job stuff” I want to point out something.
Mass Immigration at the end of the day is a government program. Government programs can be assessed on how well they’re doing, failing or succeeding. If they are failing they can be eliminated or reformed
How do you think this legal immigration is affected by 3 additional factors?
1 An additional 8 figure number of illegal aliens
2 The offspring of all of these immigrants are citizens, but raised in parents’ cultural view
3 A willingness to move here, but an unwillingness to assimilate in the melting pot.
More than 41 million immigrants lived in the U.S. as of 2013, more than four times as many as was the case in 1960 and 1970. By comparison, the U.S.-born population is only about 1.6 times the size it was in 1960. Immigrant population growth alone has accounted for 29% of U.S. population growth since 2000. (Pew, but different the article below)
**Also read from another article ** “We are talking about the kids that we historically have served least well,” said Kent McGuire, the president of the Southern Education Foundation, an Atlanta-based advocacy organization for better public schooling in that region, especially for children of color and low-income students.
“Over the decades, we have not managed to reduce the variation in performance between kids of color and white kids, and we haven’t closed the gap between advantaged kids and disadvantaged kids,” he said, “so now we have to figure out how to do something we’ve never done before, for the majority.” Dept. of Ed. projects public schools will be 'majority-minority' this fall | Pew Research Center
MY examples are showing white students decline which I am not deliberately trying to argue. My question why thinking a society’s culture will not change if the majority components (regardless of racial status quo) are supplanted by different cultures. That has no logic.