Granting nature a capacity for agency it does not possess is no different than flat earth theory.
How many abortions are the result of pressure from the man? It’s a sign of inherent misogyny to think that it’s only women who want abortions to happen.
Okay, I don’t disagree with much here at all, so I will do the world a favor and not split hairs. We will see soon enough how it all turns out. There will be action and reaction, that the way these things go.
It should be plenty bloody enough, that much I am certain.
Here are the facts:
https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Timeline_human_development
“This page is organised to show a week by week human timeline of development…”
It’s pointless to argue settled science.
And at which stage does it say that organism is a person? Human can be an adjective, as it is in your post, or a noun. Where does science fall on the question of personhood?
What is wrong with you? I never said nature cares. I made the point that through a natural course of events that same life is endowed with the capacity for personhood. Not as some rare unexpected happening from time, but is instead the expected outcome of its life.
And there is no new personhood organism switched in place of a placeholder.
I got an idea, rather than asking people to spoon feed you information, why don’t you go look it up? I provided a link to get started.
If your truly interested in finding out, the information is out there. It’s certainly better use of everyone’s time, rather than looking for hair to split for the sheer purpose of arguing.
By whom?
The questions of personhood and human being are not hairs but the entire crux of the argument.
By whom?
No they aren’t.
The question of whether or not a fetus is a person and/or human being is not the crux of the abortion argument?
The crux of the argument is that abortion kills an innocent individual human life. Killing you in the womb kills you.
Oh let me guess. That was a placeholder organism. The stork would still have dropped you off.
That’s your argument, not the general abortion argument. Although it is part of your argument since you want human life to have the same rights as a human being. Which brings up the question of whether or not human life is a human being. You can’t escape the question.
It wouldn’t have been the stork’s egg doing it.
No, you can’t escape that the same life sitting here was the same life in the womb. The same individual organism.
The why can’t I go back?
Extra trollish today?
You said a zygote is an organism. And a person is an organism. Then you said a zygote is not the same thing as a person and a person is not a zygote. Tell me again how they are the same when you said they are not the same.