Liar.
If we’re going to keep flirting can I at least buy you a drink?
It’s official that the dems have taken all the wrong lessons from Trump’s rise to power. They think cussing, questioning Trump’s health, and being inauthentic by copying his posting his outlandish techniques and mannerisms is how they will win in 2028. I hope no one tells the dems that Trump won in spite of all of that because of his policies.
When Texas eventually turns blue, it will be because this is the kind of shit our Republican legislators do.
University of Texas system students sue, say new law could ban prayers, reporting, music on campus | KXAN Austin https://share.google/S53qaXUoc8OmC3HrY
Don’t want the publicity I suppose… I am of the opinion it’s hard to embellish if you have 500 people all pointing the finger at the same person
They’re so bereft of real actionable ideas (and ideals) that they’re copying the guy that is “Literally Hitler!!!”.
They should ask their constituents what they can do for them. Crazy, I know, but so crazy that it just might work!
Sure but if done anonymously how do we know it’s 500 people?
It’s unfortunate we just went through a decade of “anonymous” sources serving as key witnesses in media moderated kangaroo courts. Makes it hard to trust.
One valid reason for it is the protection of the victims.
It could negatively affect their lives in various ways. Also, there’s always someone who thinks it’s their fault and would be aggressive towards them.
Ps. I also did read a bit about Clinton body count -theory there was talk earlier. It does not seem to pass as a valid thing.
It can’t be proven, but all those mysterious deaths within the Clinton circle sure do raise suspicions, sort of like the 7 AfD politicians who conveniently died in the last couple of weeks.
What is well established is Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to conduct business as Secretary of State, which is exactly what someone with a lot to hide would do.
At any rate, the Democratic Party is on the ropes here in the USA, even though it remains entrenched in Maine. The First Amendment is truly a remarkable innovation in government, and Musk’s purchase of X is allowing free speech to flourish. We don’t get fined or thrown in jail for pointing out the absurdity of globalist elites like people in the UK do. We can also insult our corrupt and ineffective politicians, unlike in Germany.
The same international blob of interests still tries to control the narrative in the USA and Maine, but their tools are limited compared to other parts of the world. My friend here in Lewiston was recently issued a cease and desist letter from the Soros-owned nonprofit Maine Trust for Local News for posting newspaper articles for public discussion purposes involving no monetary gain. She could probably fight it in court and win on Fair Use grounds, but that’s a very expensive fight for a private citizen to pick.
Luckily we have X, where we can learn things our “local” news rarely covers when they are busy propagandizing for Democrats. Here’s a good example of something we’re told doesn’t happen in Maine happening right in broad daylight.
Sure. But with my current info I would classify this theory not probably true, at least for the most part.
If I would prob. scale it to 4/10 in my completely made up probability scale. Earth is round being 10/10, and Reptilians being 1/10. Trump is Russian spy could be 2/10 and Epstein files have dirt from people being 8/10. Over 6-7 making things ”probably true”. Hahah.
The AfD case is interesting. I’m following it currently. The party (or some members in it) has been at least partly tied to Russia, wonder if that has something to do with it. Might be that not all these deaths are connected though.
Holy shit, did Sen Creighton ask Anyone for a second opinion before he brought this law forward?
I can understand trying to prevent unrest at colleges, but surely Anyone could see the potential problems with this law.
I mean, I want to assume the other morons who voted for it actually read it first, but maybe it’s better if they didn’t.
The TX law reads more like a noise ordinance aimed at preserving student and faculty peace to me, but maybe I’m missing something.
On the subject of individual rights, in Canada, it turns out that the best defense against home invaders is to be extremely polite to your new guests.
I’ll go ahead and take the second amendment option, but thanks for the advice, kind neighbor to the north.
In local news, Lewiston’s unusual multiple week lull in shootings was broken last night. We’re told that if only the gunman had more access to government funded activities and programs, he wouldn’t have resorted to shooting someone seven times. Hopefully he gets the restorative justice needed from the decarceration folks in town.
A simple noise ordinance would have been effective, without the controversy. And would be harder to challenge.
Banning but not defining Expressive Activities is just asking for sone kind of show down.
The law defines it. Maybe not the way everyone wants, but it seems clear to me.
Is it that important to individual rights to shout “Free Palestine” through a bullhorn outside a dorm at 10:30 at night?
One thing I really like about my region that I don’t want to see change is that the home invasions that we hear about on the news are solved by the home owner. And the police don’t file charges.
It seems to really keep them to a minimum.
And you think that requires government intervention, karen?
I think there needs to be a lot more “I disagree with with what you say, but will defend your right to say it” from Republicans trying to score cheap cultural war points.
By definition, yes. Public universities are government run entities and the law pertains to public property.
I couldn’t pull up the fine print on my phone.
I dont think I want anybody yelling on a bullhorn at night.
Either way, we’ll see what the courts in Texas gave to say.


