What I’ve read about the meeting has been generally positive. It’s not peace yet, but we’re closer to it than ever. Some want to see this fail because the don’t like EU/Trump/Z (pick your favorite). That’s a terrible choice of priorities. I think any sensible person would want this to end?
I’ve always criticised countries who does this, and will continue to do so. If someone beats people to death do you think you are allowed to do so.
There’s also difference to having big stick diplomacy and launching full scale war. I’m not thinking USA has been doing the right thing always, but it has not done Ukraine level massacre either (after 2ww).
Very bad apologism.
This is something I encourter every time when I speak with old school communists who think everything in this world is US fault.
When I tell them that Assad gassing civilians to death in Syria was a crime, they rant that western leaders kill civilians too.
In what moral stance somebody’s wrongdoing gives you permission to do so to? (Or worse?)
On which sources do you rely thr claim that Russia has not suffered many losses in this war? Pravda?
If you look the numbers different sources gives, they aren’t small. Ukraine’s and Russia’s propagandas are night and day here, but even Russians don’t claim this has been a cake walk.
The newest US based estimate was 900 000 Russian casualties and 400 000 from Ukraine. Even if you would half the numbers, it’s a lot.
Modern peer conflict. Hahah. There’s not much modern or peer in that war. You made that comparison to US and middle east.
There’s a difference between losing and lost. I’m not sure is Ukraine even losing rapidly now. Situation is dire, but critical?
If you look the war maps the progress has been close to zero flr the past 2 years of more. Village from there or another from here. Some km’s of land and thousands more dead. It’s not 2ww pace, more like 1ww.
Germany. Yes, it basically could not have winned the war after 1942, but lost 1945.
Nazis are bad analogy anyway. In 1939 Soviets assaulted Finland, because it was a ”fascist security risk for Leningrad” (afterwards prople learned Stalin had agreed to split the whole Eastern Europe half with Hitler beforehand).
It was going to be short war and Finland was lost. After a bloodbath Soviets got only eastern parts from the country. Does this sound familiar?