I said it’s clear they aren’t just going after criminals. Trump is even reversing course and saying he’s going to be carving out exemptions because… he isn’t going after just criminals but people who have been here a long time simply working their job
Trump changing course and making these exemptions is the proof they aren’t only going after hardened and dangerous criminals.
Feel free to offer your own statistics if you have them. Surely a much heralded STEM such as yourself has them, or perhaps you are amongst the ranks of us simple raving lunatics without statistics
That would take more effort than I am willing to do even if I could get access to accurate information. Nonetheless, screaming like a stuck pig without even any approximate percentages, or your personal estimates seems a complete emotional reaction with no substantial facts.
How much Type II (Beta) Error would you consider is acceptable. This is your chance to appear reasonable.
I can’t imagine any productive end to this conversation, even if I had the hard facts to show that 100% of the trump deportations were abuelitas running self funded cancer charities
So even though your offer to appear reasonable is almost too amazing and generous to pass up, I too find myself not wanting to spend the time to do so
“ICE classifies an individual as a convicted criminal if they have been convicted of any criminal violation. Violations can range from serious felonies all the way down to a purely immigration violation (such as illegal entry which is a petty offense under the U.S. Code), or a violation which results in only in a fine such as not keeping a dog on a leash, fishing without a permit, driving a vehicle with a tail light out,”
Given that, it is safe to assume the other 29,000 are not all murderers, rapists, sex traffickers, or drug dealers. The figure is most likely considerably higher than 50%.
I can agree with this statement. But what concerns me is this chart is for ICE detainees. Doesn’t it make sense that all encounters that illegal aliens have with ICE should result in being detained?
Isn’t it analogous to all encounters with those exceeding the speed limit and a highway patrol officer likely result in at least a traffic ticket?
There isn’t a wrong number. It is just an indication that you gave it some thought. Though it would be ideal if you provided a rationale to support your tolerable number.
Again… to what end? Where does this conversation go when I give you the number that tells you I’m a person reasonable enough to talk to ? And apparently now I have to give a rationale for my number? All to talk to a STEM who doesn’t want to spend his time looking for data for the conversation. Wow what an exciting opportunity
I just don’t see it going anywhere productive, and honestly I have no desire to prove myself worthy of it to someone who says they don’t want to waste time on the conversation either, so I’m going to end it here
: “We presented the American administration with evidence of Iran’s breakthrough toward a nuclear bomb. There was full and complete coordination with the Americans.”
BRET BAIER: “I just spoke to President Trump. One thing the president was aware of Israel’s action before it happened.”
“He gave me a quote. He said: ‘Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb.
We’re hoping to get back to the negotiating table.’”
“The President is looking to see if there is retaliation… the US will defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates."
Why do so many people in here have a hard time answering the questions they are asked?
Ol sky up there can’t seem to and now you won’t either unless I give my tolerances and rationales for my acceptable level of type 2 errors. You sound like a ChatGPT prompt for a fart sniffing engineer who wants to avoid a discussion
Like I said, this conversation wasn’t going anywhere, thanks for proving it
What question have I failed to answer? I asked how much Type II Error you would tolerate and you replied with a question. I even told you that I believe there is no wrong answer. Yet you reply with another question.
In fact, why didn’t you at least ask me how much Type II Error I would tolerate? Maybe there is a resulting discussion when we explain our thinking for our tolerable Error.
I don’t answer jaqoff questions. Come up with a real one one of these days and I’ll consider it.
While you’re at it, you could just face the fact that your clown party had their moment, and they wasted it on a corrupt puppet president and an idiotic dei hire. All while an auto pen ran the policy making, their cronies stole billions of tax dollars, and they allowed a massive invasion of illegals from all over the world.
And now! NOW you have the audacity to complain about how it gets cleaned up?
You’re a disingenuous fucking clown, and you can’t come within a country mile of actually challenging me, or anybody else on here in any real way.
So just pipe down with your silliness and get back on your thumbs, those appendages you’ve been sitting on for 4 years while everything you’re complaining about Trump handling now was happening.
Well that’s a question you can go really far back on. They definitely just launched an attack in Iran. Whether the war had already begun or not depends on your perspective.
As long as we don’t get dragged into it, it isn’t something I have strong feelings on at this point.
.
