For another example of anti-Christian discrimination I’ve observed, we can look at funding for homeless shelters. Lewiston has a very well-established shelter that’s been operating for over 40 years as a quasi-independent part of the Portland Catholic Diocese.
https://princeofpeace.me/outreachservice
They have the best track record in the area on a per resident basis, and it isn’t even close.
$2.5 million dollars was recently awarded to combat homelessness in Lewiston. St. Martins received $0.00 of that. Stipulations on the funding, passed by Maine Democrats, required that the funds could only be spent on “low barrier” homeless shelters.
St. Martins does not practice the low barrier model, as they believe it is a poor use of their limited resources and has incompatibilities with Catholicism.
“Low barrier” means full incorporation of all so-called “harm reduction” principles of the Democratic Socialist religion. It means de-facto legalizing public drug use, which has been a complete disaster for Lewiston’s public spaces.
Every single person who starts destroying themselves on the streets of Lewiston is a potential revenue stream for a constellation of nonprofits, often funded entirely through tax dollars.
Our low-barrier homeless shelter found a convenient home on the site of our former pool hall that was subjected to a mass shooting in October of 2023.
The owner of that business received $0.00 from the Maine Community Foundation’s “Broad Recovery Fund” that they collected from people eager to help those affected.
$2 million was awarded to completely and totally unrelated immigrant and prisoner nonprofits. Principles of “equity” as explained on their website required this to be.
I share the belief that the government has become unnecessarily hostile towards Christians in ways like the two local examples I just described. As long as no religious purity tests become imposed on Americans, I’m good with this kind of scrutiny.