[quote]Lorisco wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
jp_dubya wrote:
Seeing the tears in the eyes of a very good friend of mine, a man of color, when he said “you don’t understand what this means to me” I could only respond, “No, I can’t completely understand, but I can see it”
Now that the glass ceiling is broken, the road is paved and waiting to dry, I hope that we can sincerely get past the concentration of melanin is someone’s skin. This man Obama broke the ceiling. Without question. I disagree with his politics. There is a person of color out there that shares my point of view that will earn my vote when he is the candidate.
.
This is a great point. It is very disingenuous to say that it wasn’t about race when you see many blacks with tears in their eyes saying things like - finally a black man is president.
So without a doubt, for many, it was all about race.
Since blacks are a very small percentage of the population they could not elect anyone without other non-blacks voting as well. So without a doubt a large percentage of Whites and Latino’s also voted for Obama. And what this means is that institutional racism, for the most part, is dead. Blacks can no longer blame society for their own lack of motivation.
Now with a shinning example on capitol of what can be achieved as a person of color, there ARE no more fucking excuses! Obama has reset the achievement bar for blacks as high as the bar goes for anyone in the USA.
So while most all blacks now think this is a great day, and I believe that it is, I doubt if they understand how this event has also placed the responsibility for their own success or failure squarely back on their own shoulders.
LOL.
Anyone who thinks Clarence Thomas would get this sort of voter turn out needs to find a brain…quickly.
That’s true.
So what you are saying is that blacks are blinded by the party mantra the same as everyone else?
Thomas being demonized because he is (gasp!) a conservative black man would certainly cause some concerns for the faithful liberal minions. But on a level playing field, with candidates who are not so polarizing like Thomas, the issue of race would and is more of a factor. But, to be honest, I don’t have a problem with that at this point in time. Based on what has historically happened to blacks I think that is a very reasonable response to vote for the first black president just because he is black. However, in the future that mentality should decrease, but continuing to vote for someone just because of their race would then become an issue.
[/quote]
What I am saying is simply that if race was the only reason black people voted in this election, ANY black person running would get this amount of voter turnout.
Jesse Jackson would NOT get this amount of voter turn out.
Clarence Thomas would NOT get this amount of voter turn out.
All of those crying racism sound like spoiled brats who lost their place at the arts and crafts table.
This was a monumental occurrence in presidential history in this country, and while people may be happy that a black man finally won a presidential election, anyone thinking black people voted with race as the main issue on a mass scale is missing a few screws.
I would imagine more people voted against Obama simply because he was black than the there were black people who voted for him just because of skin color.
